Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Court: karnataka Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 12 results (0.080 seconds)

Feb 11 1986 (HC)

Town Municipal Council Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-11-1986

Reported in : ILR1987KAR1369

..... ., : [1981]1scr746 the supreme court was concerned with the action taken under sub-section (1) of section 238 of the punjab municipal act. the new delhi municipal committee was superseded in exercise of the power under sub-section (1) of section 238 of the punjab municipal act by the government. therefore, in that case invalidity of a provision of an enactment being violative of article 14 of ..... were governed by the karnataka village panchayats and local boards act, 1959. on the corning into force of the act, the karnataka village panchayats and local boards act, 1959, stands repealed. similarly, the municipal councils in the state except municipal corporations are governed by the karnataka municipalities act, 1964. this enactment is not repealed because all the municipal councils are not to be converted into mandal panchayats under ..... the act. it is only such of the municipalities which are in exercise of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 1986 (HC)

V.B. Kori Vs. Assistant Professional Tax Officer

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-10-1986

Reported in : [1986]161ITR668(KAR); [1986]161ITR668(Karn)

..... could be levied only on the firm and not on the partners individually. 22. the supreme court held that under the provisions of the punjab municipal act, 'person' included firms and individuals. 23. section 61(1) (b) of the punjab act provided as follows 118 itr 491 : 'subject to any general or special orders which the state government may make in this behalf and the ..... no bearing on the issue that arises in the writ petition. 20. on behalf of the state, reliance is placed on the decision in munshi ram v. municipal committee : [1979]118itr488(sc) rendered under the punjab municipal act. 21. in munshi ram's case : [1979]118itr488(sc) , the levy made on each of the six partners who constituted the firm, under section 61(1 ..... the karnataka tax on professions, trades, callings and employments act. 29. on the other hand, 'person' in the karnataka act means, any person who is engaged in any profession, trade, calling or employment in the state ..... it. therefore, reliance on the scheme of the income-tax act is misplaced. 27. the decision of the supreme court in munshiram's case : [1979]118itr488(sc) is a complete answer to every one of the contentions urged by sri sarangan. 28. 'person' as interpreted by the supreme court in the punjab municipal act should be applied to the term 'person' as defined in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 09 1986 (HC)

Ferro Concrete Company of India (Steels) Limited and anr. Vs. State of ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-09-1986

Reported in : [1987]64STC352(Kar)

..... (karnataka act 14 of 1977) that came into force from 1st june, 1977, in the cities of bangalore and hubli, dharwad ..... . as on 1st november, 1956, on which day the new state of mysore now called karnataka comprising of the areas specified in section 7 of the states reorganisation act came into being, the municipal laws prevailing in the different integrating areas of the new state, provided for the imposition of a duty or tax called 'octroi' considered to be an archaic and ..... a new ground, though not urged earlier. in support of his contention sri babu has strongly relied on the ruling of the supreme court in smt. somawanti v. state of punjab : [1963]2scr774 . 19. sri srinivasan had urged that the point or ground on which the present challenge was founded had not been raised, considered and decided in the two jyothi ..... obnoxious levy by many in the country. the uniform karnataka municipalities act of 1964 (karnataka act 22 of 1964) that came into force from 1st april, 1965, and the uniform municipal corporations act of 1976 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 30 1986 (HC)

The Indian Bank, Bangalore Vs. Blaze and Central (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-30-1986

Reported in : AIR1986Kant258; ILR1986KAR743; 1986(1)KarLJ260

..... of chap. v-a of the bombay municipal corporation act and the provisions of the bombay government premises (eviction) act, are also sufficient to reject the contention of the first respondent that on the ground of likelihood of bias, the exercise of powers under ss ..... chagganlal's case, : [1975]1scr1 1 in which the constitutionality of similar provisions of chap. v-a of the bombay municipal corporation act and the bombay government premises (eviction) act were upheld, the contention that the provisions of the act are violative of art. 14 of the constitution must fail. the reason given by the supreme court for upholding the constitutional validity ..... by the central government.(iii) any university established or incorporated by any central act,(iv) any institute incorporated by the institutes of technology act, 1961,(v) any board of trustees constituted under the major port trusts act, 1963,(vi) the bhakra management board, constituted under s. 79 of the punjab reorganisation act, 1966, and that board as and, when re-named as the ..... bhakra-beas management board under sub-see. (6) of s. 80 of that act.xxx xxx xxx. according to the said definition, 'public premises' .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 1986 (HC)

Jyothi Home Industries Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-21-1986

Reported in : ILR1986KAR3831; [1987]64STC208(Kar)

..... of being modulated to meet the exigencies of the situation. in a cabinet form of government, the executive is expected to reflect the views of the legislature ...........' in state of punjab v. khan chand : [1974]2scr768 it was observed : 'considering the complex nature of problems which have to be faced by a modern state, it is but inevitable that the matter ..... an entry tax, intended to raise finances substituting the old octroi till then being levied by the various local authorities and the municipal bodies in the state. there was earlier a large batch of writ petitions challenging the principal act which ultimately went upto the supreme court. the legislative history; the nature and incidents of the impost and the constitutional validity of ..... large number of cases on the constitutional limitation on delegation of legislative powers : vasanlal maganbhai sanjanwala v. state of bombay (now maharashtra) : 1978crilj1281 , devi dass gopal krishnan v. state of punjab : [1967]3scr557 , gwalior rayon, mills manufacturing (weaving) company limited v. assistant commissioner of sales tax : [1974]94itr204(sc) , avinder singh v. state of ..... punjab : [1979]1scr845 and lohia machines limited v. union of india : [1985]152itr308(sc) . 26. the argument is in two parts. the first part pertains to the constitutionality of section 3( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 31 1986 (HC)

Rudraiah Raju Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-31-1986

Reported in : ILR1986KAR587

..... will amount to striking at the root of an orderly administration of law. the 'rule of law' as observed in bachan singh v. state of punjab, : air1982sc1325 'permeates the entire fabric of the constitution and indeed forms one of its basic features.'14. the challenge is by the two citizens of ..... in this connection i may refer to the following observations of a constitution bench of the supreme court in d. s. garewal v. the state of punjab & anr., : air1959sc512 :'........at the same time parliament took care to see that these rules were laid on the table of parliament for fourteen days before ..... is the very essence of the rule of law and its bare minimum requirement.'again in the judgment in the case of bachan singh v. state of punjab, : air1982sc1325 bhagwati j, said thus ;'10. now if we look at the various constitutional provisions including the chapters on fundamental rights and directive principles ..... has been reiterated.(a) in the case of state of haryana v. jageram, : [1983]3scr917 the supreme court, interfering with the decision of the punjab government to re-auction the sale of the right to vend liquor, said thus :-'18.. if the re-auctions cannot be upheld since due publicity was ..... upheld the locus standi of the appellant-a rate payer of udupi town municipal council, to challenge the grant of a licence for construction of a cinema theatre in violation of the scheme framed under the town planning act.13. counsel for the petitioners also pointed out that financially also the impugned .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1986 (HC)

Sir M. Visweswaraya Education Trust Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-30-1986

Reported in : ILR1986KAR3095

..... estoppel expounded by the supreme court in union of india v. indo afghan agencies, air 1968 sc 718; century spinning and manufacturing company limited v. ulhasnagar municipal council, 1973 (3) scr 854; motilal padampat sugar mills company v. the state of uttar pradesh and ors., : [1979]118itr326(sc) and union of ..... of the order drawn up and communicated to a person. on the ratio of this ruling and the ruling of the supreme court in state of punjab v. khemi ram, : [1970]2scr657 on which sri poti placed great reliance, we will assume that sri poti is right in his submission that ..... and orders made in exercise whereof are not liable to be tested for their validity before the lawfully constituted courts. rai sahib ram jawaya kapur v. state of punjab : [1955]2scr225 , jayantilal amritlal shodhan v. v.n. rana, : [1964]5scr294 ; and halsbury's law of england, 3rd edn vol. 7 article ..... on or about 30-10-1984 the petitioner made an application in the prescribed form under section 53 of the karnataka state universities act, 1976 (karnataka act 28 of 1976) ('the act') to the bangalore university ('university') for grant of affiliation to a medical college called 'mahatma gandhi medical college' to he started ..... that the order made by government though referrable to section 53 of the act was still an order made in exercise of its executive powers only.19. in rai sahib ram jawaya kapur and ors. v. the state of punjab, : [1955]2scr225 a constitution bench of the supreme court in examining whether .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 05 1986 (HC)

Managing Director, Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. Geetha and ors ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-05-1986

Reported in : II(1987)ACC1; AIR1989Kant104

..... be awarded. the pronouncements of the supreme court in narcinva kamath v. alfredo antonio doe martins, : [1985]3scr951 and in chameli wati v. delhi municipal corporation, : air1986sc1191 are decisions on the facts of the cases. they are not declaration of the law under art. 141 of the constitution, in the ..... decision in particular cases are not to be treated as the words of a statute. supreme court in, amar nath om prakash v. state of punjab, : [1985]2scr72 observed:'11....... we consider it proper to say, as we have already said in other cases that judgments of course are not ..... in personal injury and fatal accident actions. lord denning m. r., said:'............. when the courts award damages to a widow under the fatal accidents act, they award one lump sum calculated by taking the yearly pecuniary loss and multiplying it by a number of years' purchase. the courts do ..... derived from the civil law. this principle was held inappropriate in the context of a statutory right of appeal under the workmen's compensation act, 1925 of england. viscount maugham said:'........ but i think the numerous cases reported in the books will be searched in vain for any suggestion ..... (iii) : sri ramachandra rao submitted that the appellant, as employer, had, in respect of this death, deposited sums awardable under the workman's compensation act, 1923, with the commissioner. the sums so deposited, it would appear, had been withdrawn by the claimant-, during the pendency of the proceedings before the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1986 (HC)

Food Corporation of India Loading and Unloading Workers' Union Vs. Foo ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-25-1986

Reported in : (1987)ILLJ407Kant

..... that the workmen of respondent-2 are the workmen of the corporation, the decision of the supreme court in olga tellis and others v. bombay municipal corporation and others (air 1986 sc 180) will have some relevance on the nature of relief to be granted to the petitioner. in that case ..... workmen employed by its independent contractor had been judicially determined by the supreme court as early as in the year 1955 in shivanandan sharma v. the punjab national bank ltd. (1955-i-llj-688). the supreme court observed as follows at page 696 : 'the appellate tribunal held that on a ..... v. d. j. bahadur and others (1981-i-llj-1). section 30(2) also throws some light on the scheme of the act. though the act permits the principal employer to engage contract labour, it is open to the workmen to enter into a contract with the principal employer directly for ..... privity of contract of employer and workmen between the corporation and the workmen. 'workman has been defined (omitting the words not necessary) in the industrial disputes act to mean 'any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do ....' the expression 'employed has at least two known connotations but as ..... in its various godowns and railheads in bangalore district as illegal, irregular, arbitrary and discriminatory being opposed to the provisions of the industrial disputes act and article 14 of the constitution and for a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the corporation not to retrench the aforesaid workers without .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1986 (HC)

Fci Loading and Unloading Workers Union Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-25-1986

Reported in : ILR1986KAR2579

..... that the workmen of respondent-2 are the workmen of the corporation, the decision of the supreme court in olga tellis and ors. v. bombay municipal corporation and ors., : air1986sc180 will have some relevance on the nature of relief to be granted to the petitioner. in that case inspite of ..... employed by its independent contractor had been judicially determined by the supreme court as early as in the year 1955 in shivanandan sharma v. the punjab national bank ltd., : (1955)illj688sc the supreme court observed as follows:'the appellate tribunal held that on a reading as a whole of the ..... v. d. j. bahadur and ors., 1981 (1) llj 1.section 30(2) also throws some light on the scheme of the act. though the act permits the principal employer to engage contract labour, it is open to the workmen to enter into a contract with the principal employer directly for ..... of contract of employer and workmen between the corporation and the workmen. 'workman has been defined (omitting the words not necessary) in the industrial disputes act to mean 'any persons (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do ........' the expression 'employed has at least two known connotations but as ..... in its various godowns and railheads in bangalore district as illegal, irregular, arbitrary and discriminatory being opposed to the provisions of the industrial disputes act and article 14 of the constitution and for a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the corporation not to retrench the aforesaid workers without .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //