Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Court: kerala Year: 1966 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.030 seconds)

Jan 05 1966 (HC)

Srikandath Govinda Menon Vs. Union of India (Uoi), New Delhi and anr.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-05-1966

Reported in : AIR1966Ker216

..... suit for the refund of the terminal tax will not lie when the remedy provided by the act is not pursued by the claimant, but even in such ..... raised was whether a suit would lie in a civil court claiming refund of the terminal tax collected by the ludhiana municipality under the provisions of the punjab municipal act. it was held therein that a ..... excluded other than a challenge in the civil courts." the same principles were applied by the high courts in india in bhaishankar nanabhai v. municipal corporation of bombay, (1907) ilr 31 bom 604, their lordships of the bombay high court held : "where a special tribunal, out of ..... the learned judges. they were :--proposition no. 1 the commissions is a corporation sole, not the servant of the government that against a person acting in the capacity of a commissioner, the government has no jurisdiction to take disciplinary proceedings: proposition no. 2. that quasi-judicial orders and ..... not possess and for usurpation of power the remedy provided by the act cannot be held to be exclusive." 20. this question was considered by the supreme court in the decision in firm seth radha kishan v. administrator, municipal committee, ludhiana, (air 1968 sc 1547) where again the question .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //