Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Court: madhya pradesh Year: 1960 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.079 seconds)

Dec 19 1960 (HC)

Mulla Haji Yusufali and anr. Vs. Pandit Laxminarayan

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-19-1960

Reported in : AIR1961MP311

..... right of preemption on the ground of vicinage is a reasonable restriction. since the impugned enactment relates only to immovable property within the limits of a municipality or a notified area, we would restrict our attention to such property. it is urged before us that the towns in the bhopal region are in ..... land in regard to the validity of the pre-emption law was pointed out, and it was observed that the decisions in air 1951 all 247, punjab state v. inder singh, air 1953 punj 20 and air 1954 punj 55, were not in point as they related to agricultural lands and the ..... abrogated by the provisions of the constitution. tare, j. observed ;'i am unable to see anything unreasonable, as customary law of pre-emption is prevalent in punjab as also in other states there is a statutory law of pre-emption in respect of agricultural holdings.'in yakub mohammad v. karim, 1959 mplj 1218 : ..... view was again taken in regard to the relevant provision of the alwar state pre-emption act, 1946, nathuram v. patram, air 1960 raj 125 (sb).so far as the punjab high court is concerned, section 16 of the punjab pre-emption act was upheld as valid in its entirety by a full bench : uttam singh v. ..... substantial question of law involving interpretation of the constitution by a larger bench. 2. the question is whether section 11 sixthly of the bhopal pre-emption act, 1934 (iii of 1934) providing for a right of pre-emption 'in the persons who own immovable property contiguous to the property sold' is void .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //