Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Court: rajasthan Page 1 of about 410 results (0.029 seconds)

Jul 12 2007 (HC)

Assistant Director, Land and Building Tax Department and ors. Vs. Bhar ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(1)Raj439

..... assessing the annual value of row of quarters in one block as a 'building' for the purpose of levying house tax under the punjab municipal act, 1911. the expression, 'building' in the punjab municipal act, 1911 is defined in clause (2) of section 3 of the act to mean 'any shop, house, hut, outhouse, shed or stable, whether used for the purpose of human habitation or otherwise and ..... whatever purpose used but does not include-(a) a tenant or other such protable structure.(b) a dwelling house erected on a holding as defined in the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955 (rajasthan act 3 of 1955) by the tenant for his own occupation or a cattleshed or a store house or any other construction for agricultural purposes erected or set up by ..... case of tata engineering & locomotive co. ltd. v. gram panchayat, pimpri waghere : [1977]1scr306 while dealing with the expression 'houses & lands' used in section 89 of the bombay village panchayat act, 1933 accorded approval to the aforesaid observations made in the cases of yorkshire fire and life insurance company and grant. in paragraph 15 of the report, the supreme court observed ..... , all lead to the irresistible conclusion that a portion of a building owned and possessed separately by different persons is a different unit for the purpose of assessment under said act.circular no. 27/74sd/-s.l. joshidirectorlands and buildings tax deptt.,rajasthan, jaipur.10. the state government itself looked into the question whether different portions of a building occupied .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 29 1956 (HC)

Kesari Mal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1957Raj284

..... of the order, unless the government chooses to remove the disqualification earlier.9. it may be pointed out in passing that the various acts with regard to municipalities in other states are not so drastic in effect. in the punjab municipal act, 1911, the provision to remove a president is provided in section 22. the removal of the president can be 'done by the provincial government ..... , and that as result of this pressure the present government, which was run by the congress party, ordered his removal under cover of section 22 (10) of the rajasthan town municipalities act, 1951 (act no. 23 of 1951). it was alleged that he was served by the secretary, local self-government, with a charge-sheet by letter dated 10th november, 1955 of which ..... president so removed is only declared not to be eligible for re-election as a president or vice-president during the remainder of the term of office of the municipality. the u. p. municipalities act, 1916, provides by section 48 that the state government may, at any time, if it is satisfied that there has been a persistent failureon behalf of the president ..... the order of the government should, therefore, be set aside. (3) the charge, ex. p. 1, was as follows :'notice under section 22 (10) of the rajasthan town municipalities act, 1951, to the chairman, municipal board, sironj.from the complaints received against you, the audit report and other enquiry reports and your reply thereto the following stand substantiated against you :(1) you ought .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 1988 (HC)

J.K. Synthetics Vs. Municipal Council, Kota

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1989Raj51; 1988(2)WLN487

..... constitution which tax the notified area committee was competent to levy under sub-section (2) of section 61 of the punjab municipal act, 1911 with the previous sanction of the state government shah j., speaking for the bench, observed : --'the expression ' use' is not defined in the ..... similar to the provisions contained in sections 139 and 141 of the rajasthan municipalities act, j 959. it was observed : ---even in such cases, the civil court's jurisdiction ..... court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit. the provisions of sections 84 and 86 of the punjab municipal act (3 of 1911) were more or less similar to the provisions contained in sections 139 and 141 of the rajasthan municiplaities act. 1959. his lordship subba rao, j., speaking for the court, after referring to various ..... , one is outside the act and the other is under the act, one raises the question of jurisdiction and the other raises an objection as to a matter of detail.'it has already been mentioned that the provisions of sections 84 and 86 of the punjab municipal act (3 of 1911) were more or less ..... a substantial question of law relating to the validity of the levy or what was styled as 'supervision-fee under section 124 of the karnataka municipalities act, 1964, read with rule 26 of the rules framed thereunder. the facts were that iron ore was lifted by the respondent in the trucks .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 1957 (HC)

Prahlad Vs. Secretary Municipal Board, Jodhpur

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1958Raj32

..... mention in passing that the provision to bar the bringing of suits against municipalities is not to be found in the municipal laws in force in other parts of india. (see for example section 326 of the u. p. municipalities act (no. 2) 1916, section 49 of the punjab municipal act, 1911 (no. 3 of 1911) ).the general position which has been accepted by the legislatures of the various ..... be sustained in the new context of things, and having regard to the principle of equality of law embodied in our constitution.7. i now revert to the rajasthan town municipalities act, 1951. the relevant section to which attention may be invited in this connection is section 179. all that this section provides is that no suit shall be instituted against any ..... former jodhpur state, no citizen of that state could bring a suit against the state without the sanction of the government. the bar contained in section 220 of the jodhpur municipal act perhaps owes its origin to the shape of things existing in that state when the said law was enacted.it may further be pointed out that although the restriction placed ..... court, cannot be barred upon considerations of policy or political expediency.'5. against this background, the question which falls for consideration before me is whether section 220 of the jodhpur municipal act can be upheld on the principle of reasonable classification. it must be remembered, however, that such classification to be constitutional must not be arbitrary and should be based on an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 15 2002 (HC)

Jai Chand Soni and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(1)Raj176; 2002(2)WLC555

..... the verandah in front of the shop owned by the appellant in the connaught circus, new delhi, as public street under section 171(4) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 and it was affirmed by the trial court by having dismissed the suit of the plaintiff, against which first appeal was also dismissed, rather second appeal and letters patent appeal ..... land/property could be transferred in favour of the plaintiffs or whether the state government was competent to sell the suit nazool property? (9) whether section 203 of the rajasthan municipalities act does apply in view of specific plea of the plaintiffs that they had not made encroachment or obstructions upon public land? (10) whether the property rights can be taken away ..... the kurup committee had already rejected objections raised for such sale of land of public street (verandah) and further municipality's orders dated 18.1.86, 28.1.86, 7.3.86 & 17.3.86 issued under sec. 203 of the rajasthan municipalities act, 1959 were upheld, inasmuch as in s.b. civil writ petition no. 1532/84 this court (sb) issued an ..... court (db) held that on a proper interpretation of the act and rajasthan land revenue act, it appears reasonably to hold that section 92(2)(e) of the municipalities act refers to property not only vesting in but also belonging to the municipal board and the property belonging to the government and not to the municipal board, cannot be covered by section 92(2)(e) of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 1986 (HC)

Rampal Agarwal Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1987Raj198; 1986(2)WLN569

..... for determination in s. l. kapoor v. jagmohan, air 1981 sc 136. in that case in exercise of the powers conferred by section 12 of the punjab municipal act, 1911 as applicable to new delhi, the lt. governor of the union territory of delhi by a notification dated september 28, 1979 appointed nine non-official members ..... and four ex-officio members to the new delhi municipal committee to hold office for a period of one year with effect from october 4, 1979. however, well before the expiry of the term for which ..... set aside being violative of natural justice. the aforesaid decision of their lordships of the supreme court was followed in jathedar jagdev singh v. state of punjab, air 1982 punj and har 16. though in the reply filed on behalf of the respondents nos. 3 and 5 it has been stated that the ..... appointed, on february 27, 1980 the lt. governor in exercise of the powers conferred by section 238(1) superseded the new delhi municipal committee with immediatue effect and appointed shri p. n. behl as the person who may exercise and perform all powers and duties of the new delhi ..... municipal committee until the said committee was reconstituted. the order contained reasons. the preamble to the order of supersession recited that the committee was incompetent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 06 1993 (HC)

iswar Singh Vs. Ganga Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1994Raj62

..... 15. in dr. h.s. rikhy v. the new delhi municipal committee, air 1962 sc 554 while interpreting the provisions of sections 18 and 47 of the punjab municipal act, 1911, whose provisions are similar to the provisions of section 80 of the act, the apex court has held that the legal significance of the ..... expression 'shall not be binding on the committee' in section 47 is that the contract, the power to enter which is given by section 18, shall not be enforceable against the municipal ..... sale deed dated 30-7-1985 (annex. r/6) executed in favour of respondent no. 2 by the municipal board under section 80(2) of the rajasthan municipalities act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the act), ordered for refund of the sale amount and for taking the possession of the disputed land. aggrieved by the ..... it stands firmly established that the respondent ganga singh had filed revision petition no. 7/89 under section 80(2) of the act against sag ram and the municipal board challenging the order of allotment d/-20-7-85 and the allotment letter d/-30-7-85 annex. r./6, wherein ..... allotted in favour of sag ram. it is is alleged that the said order was clearly against the provisions of the act and the rules of 1974. the then chairman, municipal board, nagaur also issued, subsequent order of allotment dated 30-7-1985 annex. r/6 in favour of respondent sag .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 04 2007 (HC)

Modern Educational and Cultural Society Vs. Nizam and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2007(4)Raj3214

..... ors. : (2004)5scc182 the dispute was regarding open spaces earmarked for developing the parks used by the inhabitants of the locality. the scheme was approved by the municipal corporation under the punjab municipal act, 1911. when the scheme had been approved and duly developed and the open space was being used by the inhabitants, the respondent filed a suit claiming the said land, ..... which was dismissed. appeal there against was allowed by the first appellate court. the municipal corporation went in appeal to the supreme court against that judgment. the hon ..... to be used by public in general stand dedicated to the public for common objective and must therefore remain with the state and its instrumentalities such as ida, municipal board, municipal corporation or any other public authority. such open spaces cannot be allotted to any private person or body. their use cannot be changed or converted by the jda ..... the rightful common destiny, according to a 'master plan' based on careful and comprehensive surveys and studies of present conditions and the prospects of future growth of the municipality, and embodying scientific teachings and creative experience.32. the significance of a development planning cannot therefore be denied. planned development is the crucial zone that strikes a balance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 18 1991 (HC)

Smt. Baljit Kaur and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1991(2)WLN522

..... abdication of the essential legislative function.21. in the case of ram dial (supra), the question was regarding removal of member in public interest under section 14(e) of the punjab municipalities act, 1911 which provided the removal of the incumbent in public interest. but there was no provision of hearing of the member to be removed whereas under section 16(1) the removal ..... thereof, learned counsel has invited our attention to n.k. papiah & sons v. the excise commission and anr. air 1965 sc 1007; ram dial and ors. v. the state of punjab : [1965]2scr858 ; a.n. parasuraman and ors. v. state of tamil nadu (1989) 4 scc 683 and state of maharashtra v. mrs. kamal s. durgule : [1985]2scr129 .18. as ..... , february 22, 1991g.s.rule 33.-ln exercise of the powers conferred by the sub-section (1) of section 79 of the rajasthan panchayat samitis and zila parishads act, 1959 (rajasthan act 37 of 1959) and all other powers enabling it in this behalf, the state government hereby makes the following amendment in the rajasthan panchayat samitis and zila parishads service ..... advocate general submitted that it is wrong to contend that there is abdication of the essential legislative function. learned counsel submitted that there is sufficient guidelines already contained in the act and the criteria has been laid down only for bringing uniformity in the recruitment all over rajasthan and minimising the arbitrariness. learned additional advocate general has invited our attention .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1959 (HC)

Deodutt Sharma Vs. Zahoor Ahmed Zaid and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1960Raj25

..... it be remembered in this connection that the regulation was itself enacted in 1925, and section 242 thereof is almost a verbatim copy of section 236 of the punjab municipal act (no. iii) of 1911. the language of this section is not very happy and perhaps suffers from a certain amount of obscurity.but we are disposed to think that if we were to ..... deliberately did not call a meeting of the committee to elect a chairman. there is no provision in the above regulation similar to the provision contained in the rajasthan town municipalities act authorising the collector to convene a meeting to elect a chairman. it cannot be said in the circumstances that the committee failed to elect a chairman in the manner prescribed ..... attempt to define them exhaustively. in the aforesaid case it was held that an order passed by the state government under section 53-a of the c. p. and berar municipalities act (no. ii) of 1922 appointing an executive officer for a certain period with certain powers was a merely administrative order, and that it was more a matter of policy rather ..... member pointed out that the mayor could not adjourn the meeting without the consent of the members. the mayor's attention was drawn to section 88 (m) of the hyderabad municipal corporation act (no. 2) of 1956 which, let it be noted, is exactly worded like section 55 of the regulation we have been called upon to consider in this case.nevertheless .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //