Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Court: rajasthan Year: 1960 Page 1 of about 5 results (0.025 seconds)

Aug 17 1960 (HC)

Jaiwant Rao and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-17-1960

Reported in : AIR1961Raj250

..... and 34 urged that the petitioners had no fundamental right to base their case upon in challenging the elections of the municipal councillors of the kotah municipality and their rights, if any, emanated. from the rajasthan town municipalities act, 1951; and the said act being a comprehensive piece of legislation, the petitioners could only seek the remedy provided under that statute, namely, by way of ..... to file objections against the 'electoral rolls granted to them by rules 7(2) of the rajasthan town municipal election rules, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the election rules).he drew support on this point from the decisions in shiam sunder v. state of punjab, air 1958 punj 128, chief commissioner, ajmer v. radhey shyam, (s) air 1957 sc 304, lachhmansingh v ..... on the ground of voters' lists not having been prepared on the basis of wards and objections not having been invited thereto. the punjab legislative assembly electoral rolls were adopted for the purpose of elections to the municipality and a key chart was-issued by the deputy commissioner, ambala dividing the electoral rolls into six parts and thus constituting six wards. the ..... . state of punjab, air 1959 punj 522 and udaram v. state of rajasthan, ilr (1960) 10 raj 540.17. mr. rastogi for contesting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 24 1960 (HC)

State of Rajasthan Vs. Shamlal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-24-1960

Reported in : AIR1960Raj256

..... repealed. it follows that the appellant's rights under the dhara no. 29 of st. 2004 were still good and could have been enforced in the municipal courts until either repealed or repudiated as an act of state. these rights were carried over after the constitution when the indian republic was formed with this important difference, viz., that as the appellant then ..... their observations should be read and understood in the context of the facts and circumstances of the case in which they were made. we may refer in this connection to punjab co-operative bank ltd. v. commr. of income-tax, lahore, air 1940 pc 230 in which their lordships of the privy, council reproduced with approval, the following remarks of lord ..... , important to notice that immediately after the rajpramukh of patiala had taken over the administration of find on its merger: with the east punjab states union on (the terms of the covenant, he promulgated the patiala and east punjab states union administration ordinance (1 of st. 2005) repealing all laws in force in such covenanting state immediately before the date of the ..... administration of jind, on 20-8-1948, and immediately after assumption of office, he promulgated the patiala and east punjab states union administration ordinance no. 1 of smt. 2005. by section 3 of the said ordinance it was provided that all laws, ordinances, acts, rules, regulations, notifications etc. having force of law in patiala state on the date of the commencement of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 1960 (HC)

Manka Vs. the State and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-05-1960

Reported in : 1961CriLJ406

..... decision of this court in chauthmal v. state of rajasthan . in that case the government had superseded a municipal in exercise of powers under section 203(1) of the rajasthan town municipalities act.the pre-requisite for the exercise of such powers was the subjective satisfaction of the government that the ..... municipal board is not competent to perform, or persistently makes default in the performance of, the duties imposed on ..... high court in pukhraj champalal jain v. d.r. kohlij 61 bom lr 1230 andl by a division bench of the punjab high court in gian chand v. state of punjab, criminal revn. no. 1566 of 1958, decided on 2-3-60. a similar view-was taken in both the ..... calcutta (s) : 1983ecr1657d(sc) on the ground that it offends article 14 of the constitution. after reviewing the relevant provisions of the act it was held that successive remedies were provided to an aggrieved person from whom articles had been seized and confiscated and these afforded sufficient safeguards ..... such offence shallany prohibition or be liable to arestriction for the penalty nottime being in force exceeding threeunder or by virtue times the valueof this act with of the goods,respect thereto or not exceedingacquires possession one thousand rupees.of or is in any wayconcerned in carrying,removing, depositing,harbouring, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 1960 (HC)

Nirmal Singh and anr. Vs. Satnam and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-11-1960

Reported in : AIR1960Raj313

..... transaction was for the benefit of the estate inasmuch as the house was in a dilapidated condition and that the defendants had received a notice from the municipality to pull it down. it seems that the learned judges were treating the terms 'legal necessity' and 'benefit of the estate' as interchangeable, ..... protection of tenants from ejectment from their holdings as else for regulating the produce rent and that there was an intention to purchase land in the punjab, and, therefore, the impugned sale was protected by the principle of the benefit of estate as interpreted above and docs not deserve to be ..... the ground that certain legislation had come into force in the shape of the rajasthan (protection of tenants) ordinance and the rajasthan produce rents regulating act, and, therefore, daulatram had become apprehensive of his rights with respect to the land in question and thought that he might altogether lose it or ..... , he is bound to see to the application of the money ..... their lordships do not think that a bonafide creditor should suffer when he has acted honestly and with due caution, but is himself deceived'.8. the above case, among others, was considered by their lordships of the privy council in ..... knew that the rajasthan (protection of tenants) ordinance, 1949 (no. ix of 1949) had come into force and so also the rajasthan produce rents regulating act, 1951 (no. xv of 1951), and, he was, therefore, under an apprehension that he might lose all his rights with respect to the suit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 29 1960 (HC)

Ram Chandra Vs. Laxman Das and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-29-1960

Reported in : [1961]12STC367(Raj)

..... the end laid an emphasis upon income-tax officer, jullundur v. the state [1950] 18 i.t.r. 688 a full bench decision of the punjab high court, where emperor v. osman chotani [1942] 10 i.t.r. 429 was dissented from. weston, c.j., with whom the three other ..... to facilitate investigation. kapur, j., however, in his concurring judgment, after referring to some english decisions interpreting section 17 of the agricultural marketing act of 1931 observed that in the english case, a prohibition against production in court was implied from the fact that the disclosure was made a ..... to obtain copies and, therefore, certified copies in their hands having been unlawfully issued are inadmissible; (2) section 54 of the income-tax act makes the issue of such copies unlawful and makes the disclosure of any particulars contained in the returns an offence punishable with six months' imprisonment ..... that the legislature provided a prohibition against the courts for compelling the production of the documents and specifically rendered the provisions of the evidence act in this connection ineffective. a proper understanding of the implications of this later part thus lends a clear support to the view that ..... to produce the documents specified in the earlier part. in connection with this part, an expression, 'notwithstanding anything contained in the indian evidence act no. 1 of 1872' has been introduced. the omission of any similar expression in the earlier part is consequently very significant and material and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //