Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Court: rajasthan Year: 1988 Page 1 of about 10 results (0.026 seconds)

Mar 08 1988 (HC)

J.K. Synthetics Vs. Municipal Council, Kota

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-08-1988

Reported in : AIR1989Raj51; 1988(2)WLN487

..... constitution which tax the notified area committee was competent to levy under sub-section (2) of section 61 of the punjab municipal act, 1911 with the previous sanction of the state government shah j., speaking for the bench, observed : --'the expression ' use' is not defined in the ..... similar to the provisions contained in sections 139 and 141 of the rajasthan municipalities act, j 959. it was observed : ---even in such cases, the civil court's jurisdiction ..... court has jurisdiction to entertain the suit. the provisions of sections 84 and 86 of the punjab municipal act (3 of 1911) were more or less similar to the provisions contained in sections 139 and 141 of the rajasthan municiplaities act. 1959. his lordship subba rao, j., speaking for the court, after referring to various ..... , one is outside the act and the other is under the act, one raises the question of jurisdiction and the other raises an objection as to a matter of detail.'it has already been mentioned that the provisions of sections 84 and 86 of the punjab municipal act (3 of 1911) were more or less ..... a substantial question of law relating to the validity of the levy or what was styled as 'supervision-fee under section 124 of the karnataka municipalities act, 1964, read with rule 26 of the rules framed thereunder. the facts were that iron ore was lifted by the respondent in the trucks .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 1988 (HC)

Ganga Ram Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-06-1988

Reported in : 1988WLN(UC)469

..... rajasthan air 1985 rlr 1 also this court extended the benefit of provisions of the probation of offenders act. in puramjit singh v. the municipal corporation of delhi and anr. air 1982 sc 1005 also the offence was committed 13 years before and as such the court considered the ..... isher das v. the state of punjab : 1972crilj874 applied provisions of the probation of offenders act. how ever the court stated that it should not be given as a general rule. in munni lal v. state of ..... petitioner as aforesaid and that he is a petty hawker, i deem it proper to extend him the benefit of provisions of the probation of offenders act.5. in the result, this revision-petition is partly allowed. the conviction of the accused petitioner is maintained for offence under section 7/16 of ..... the general rule, and in that very case his lordship considering the case as an exceptional has granted benefit under the provisions of probation of offenders act. the judgment has been read by the learned appellate judge in between the lines.2. as against this, their lordships of the supreme court in ..... backward classes. it is also submitted that the courts below erred in rejecting the prayer for dealing the petitioner the under provisions of probation of offenders act, even though the amendments in section 20aa have been brought on statute on 1-4-1976. the appellate court has in this respect relied on pappu .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 1988 (HC)

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Smt. Manorma and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Nov-30-1988

Reported in : 1989WLN(UC)467

..... rate even according to some recent decisions of the supreme court (see smt. chameli wati and another v. delhi municipal corporation, delhi and ors. : air1986sc1191 and jagbir singh and ors. v. general manager, punjab roadways and ors. : [1986]3scr1095 . accordingly we direct that interest shall be paid on the amount of ..... the decision was rendered in an appeal under section 110-d of the motor vehicles act and not a special appeal thereafter under section 18 of the rajasthan high court ordinance. shri munshi placed reliance on the decisions of the ..... and another v. dewalal and ors. air 1987 raj. 121, has clearly held that in an appeal under section 110 d of the motor vehicles act the respondent can file cross-objection by invoking the provisions of order 41 rule 22 cpc. shri munshi attempted to distinguish that decision by contending that ..... can be sled in this special appeal even if a cross-objection was maintainable in the appeal under section 110 d of the motor vehicles act decided by the learned single judge. sari munshi also contended that the cross-objection is time barred. on behalf of the claimants shri mridul ..... corporation (for short, 'the rsrtc) against which the award had been made preferred an appeal under section 110-d of the motor vehicles act wherein the claimants filed cross-objection the learned single judge partly allowed the appeal filed by the rsrtc and reduced the amount of compensation payable to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 1988 (HC)

Mahadeo Vs. Sarpanch Gram Panchayat and 2 ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-17-1988

Reported in : 1988(2)WLN45

..... in the year 1949 under its resolution ex a 1. the plaintiff continued to be the secretary of the municipal board under the rajasthan town municipality act, 1951 and thereafter under the rajasthan municipalities act, 1959 but at the same time the state government did not become the disciplinary authority because the appointment of ..... it was only the state of rajasthan which could terminate his services as he had been originally appointed as secretary of napasar municipality. according to the provisions contained in the rajasthan municipalities act, 1959, it was only the state government which was his appointing and dismissing authority. the action of the defendants nos ..... the supreme court in sitaram v. m.b. kanpur (alr 1958 sc 1036 & that of the allahabad high court in darjahilal nigam v. kanpur municipal board : air1952all382 . consequently, even if it is assumed for a moment that the order of termination dated february 28, 1963 was in any way invalid ..... to know on may 28 1951 about the dismissal order. this date was taken to be the date of communication. shelat, j. in state of punjab v. khemi ram : [1970]2scr657 in paragraph 16 observed as under:it will be seen that all the decisions cited before us it was ..... of action. the plaintiff's suit was rightly held to be barred by limitation.23. it may be observed that in the case of state of punjab v. amar singh harika : (1966)iillj188sc the order of dismissal passed on june 3, 949 was actually communicated to the officer concerned on january .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 10 1988 (HC)

Ashok Foundry and Metal Works (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-10-1988

Reported in : 1988WLN(UC)219

..... government which has the liberty to specify a higher percentage than three. in maharashtra state electricity board v. kalyan municipality : [1968]3scr137 the supreme court after analysing section 49 of the 1948 act laid down that section 49 empowers the board to frame uniform tariffs and it has also indicated in sub-sections ..... in plant and mains, and labour on which he is entitled to a reasonable return.18. in amalgamated electricity co. ltd. v. the jalgaon borough municipality : [1976]1scr636 , their lordships of the supreme court, while dealing with the provisions of minimum charges in the agreement have observed as follows:9. ..... v. assistant engineer (hmt division), rseb, kota and anr. 1987 (ii) rlr 1. he has also placed reliance on saila bala v. darjeeling municipality air 1935 cal 265 and, on the basis of that authority it is submitted that a minimum charge is not really a charge which has for ..... no electricity. the same is the position in the united states of america.17. the levy of the minimum charge has been justified by the punjab high court in watkins mayor and co. v. jullundur electric supply co. , on the ground that every consumer's installation involves the licensee in ..... the minimum charges which have been provided in the new tariff are out of proportion, arbitrary and against the provisions of the electricity (supply) act, 1948 and we are required to examine whether this contention of the petitioner is well founded.13. production, supply and distribution of electricity is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 07 1988 (HC)

Vimla Agarwal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Oct-07-1988

Reported in : 1989WLN(UC)213

..... i will deal with this case at a letter stage because this has an important bearing on the law involved in the instant case.21. the case of municipal corporation of delhi v. ramkishan rohtagi and ors. : 1983crilj159 was that of quashing the trial under section 482, cr.p.c. and, therefore, has ..... and am fortified in my view with the observations made in madhavrao scindhia's case (supra) and to borrow the phraseology of their lordships of the punjab and haryana high court i hold that i see no blanket bar against quashing of the first information report in the circumstances mentioned here in below ..... 2scr52 , kurukshetra university and another v. state of haryana and another : 1977crilj1900 . mis. maheshwari oil mill v. the state of bihar 1978 cr. lj 659, state of punjab v. dharam singh and ors. (1987 supp) supreme court cases 89, and raj kapoor and ors. v. state and ors. 1980 (1) supreme court cases 43. it ..... spare copy meant for shri b.l. sharma, advocate to whom the sho shall get the order served. it is expected that shri sharma will start acting upon the order from tomorrow onwards and finish it as early as possible.put up after three weeks.5. reply was submitted by the respondent and ..... 1982 rajendra kumar agrawal and his wife vimla separated from the family and both of them started living separately. it was alleged that non-petitioners started acting in an arbitrary manner and when accounts were asked from him, he used to start picking up quarrel. then on inquiry, it was learnt that .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 26 1988 (HC)

Secretary, Zila Parishads and anr. Vs. Nathi Mali Chowkidar and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-26-1988

Reported in : 1988(2)WLN465

..... judicial surveyor 62) wherein their lordships, after considering several judgments of the supreme court, held that octroi department of the municipal board deshnok constitutes 'industry' within the meaning of section 2(j) of the act of 1947.11. he has further placed reliance on an earlier decision of this court in vinay kumar v. state and ..... been confirmed by a division bench in special appeal, on 19-3-1986.15. mr keshote has brought to our notice a judgment of the punjab and haryana high court in 1984(1) llr 571 where their lordships have held that zila parishad is an 'industry' for the purpose of section 2 ..... supervisory duties for the better management of the panchayat samitis and does not function of its own. does not find support: from sections 57 of the act of 1959. it is true that zila parishad has to supervise generally the activities of the panchayat samiti in the district, but apart from that, ..... on or entrust to it;(vi) exercise and perform such powers and functions as are conferred on and delegated or entrusted to it by or under this act;(vii) classify fairs and festivals, other than those that are or may here after to be managed by the state government, as panchayat fairs and ..... etc. and distributing and supplying water for irrigation purposes, has been held to be an 'industry' within the meaning of section 2(j) of the act of 1947.13. our attention has also been drawn to yet another decision of this court in radha krishna sharma v. rajasthan financial corporation 1986 rlr 510 .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 26 1988 (HC)

Kunti Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-26-1988

Reported in : 1988WLN(UC)331

..... the written consent does not, in our opinion follow. in the present case the analyst's report was before the chief officer of the municipality and it was after coasidering that report and the connected documents that the written consent or sanction was given. in the second place the ..... the conduct of food adulteration cases in the judicial courts by the asstt public prosecutors. they have also brought to our notise state of punjab v. devinder kumar and ors. : 1983crilj980 where in their lordships of the supreme court observed that the courts should hot quash the proceedings under ..... there is a written consent of the competent authority for instituting the case, as required by section 20(1) of the prevention of food adulteration act.23. before parting with the case, we would like to observe that is really very unfortunate that adulteration and mis-branding of food stuff ..... food inspector produced the relevant papers before the local health authority (chief medical and health officer, tonk) who accorded written sanction under section 20 of the act, for prosecution of the petitioner,(vide ex.p. 20). complaint (ex.p21) was presented by the assistant public prosecutor in the court of chief ..... that rule 3 of the prevention of food adulteration (punjab) rules, 1958 must be read subject to the provisions contained in section 20(1) of the act and cannot be construed to authorise sub-delegation of powers by the food (health) authority, punjab, to the local food inspector. it has further .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 07 1988 (HC)

State of Rajasthan Vs. Sukan Raj and 8 ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-07-1988

Reported in : 1988(1)WLN780

..... reliance on a decision of their lordships of the supreme court in kewal krishan v. state of punjab : [1979]3scr1217 , wherein it was observed:that after all the whole object of the act is the supervision and control of the transactions of purchase by the traders from the agriculturists in order ..... may declare such an intention about a specified area and may invite objections or suggestions from the persons concerned. section 4(1) of the act provides that after the expiry of the period specified in the notification issued under section 3 and after considering such objections and suggestions as ..... provisions of section 14 be used for the purchase or sale of any agricultural produce specified in the notification issued thereunder.section 3 of the act relates to the notification that may be issued by the state government disclosing its intention of exercising control over purchase and sale of agricultural produce ..... placed reliance on arunachala nadar v. state of madras : air1959sc300 and quoted with approval the following passage from the judgment of their lordships:the act is conceived and enacted to regulate the buying and selling or agriculture produce by providing suitable and regulated market by eliminating middleman and bringing face ..... in pursuance of section 4(1) of the act, the state government vide its notification no. f 10(2) agri/gr. 2/75 dated 21-4-1977 declared the market area of pali consisting of panchayat samiti, pali and rohit as also the municipal area of pali.7. mr. r.k. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 04 1988 (HC)

Ghhagan Kanwar and ors. Vs. Nainu Ram and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-04-1988

Reported in : 2(1988)ACC374

..... 'ble supreme court in narchinva v. kamat and anr. etc. v. alfredo antonio doe martins and ors. 1985 sc 1281 chameli wati v. delhi municipal corporation and ors. : air1986sc1191 and jagbir singh and ors. v. general manager, punjab roadways and ors. 1 (1987) acc 1 the interest should be 12% from the date of application till the date of realisation. para 3 ..... . : [1985]3scr951 , this court awarded interest at 12 per cent from the date of the accident upto the date of payment. subsequently in smt. chameli wati and anr. v. delhi municipal corporation of delhi and ors. : air1986sc1191 , a larger bench of this court awarded compensation at 12 per cent per annum from the date of the application for compensation. we are ..... .c. v. kistoori devi and ors. 1986 acj 960 in which the full bench of this court had held that the provisions of the motor vehicles act are over-riding over the fatal accidents act and the amount of compensation for consortium should be allowed.7. mr. gupta further pointed out that the policy of the insurance is comprehensive one and, therefore ..... guman mal lodha, acting c.j.1. on 30th of november, 1983, at about 7-30 p.m. tanker no. r.j.q. 3905, driven by respondent no. 1, dashed with the motor cycle .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //