Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Court: rajasthan Year: 1993 Page 1 of about 6 results (0.027 seconds)

Jul 06 1993 (HC)

iswar Singh Vs. Ganga Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-06-1993

Reported in : AIR1994Raj62

..... 15. in dr. h.s. rikhy v. the new delhi municipal committee, air 1962 sc 554 while interpreting the provisions of sections 18 and 47 of the punjab municipal act, 1911, whose provisions are similar to the provisions of section 80 of the act, the apex court has held that the legal significance of the ..... expression 'shall not be binding on the committee' in section 47 is that the contract, the power to enter which is given by section 18, shall not be enforceable against the municipal ..... sale deed dated 30-7-1985 (annex. r/6) executed in favour of respondent no. 2 by the municipal board under section 80(2) of the rajasthan municipalities act, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the act), ordered for refund of the sale amount and for taking the possession of the disputed land. aggrieved by the ..... it stands firmly established that the respondent ganga singh had filed revision petition no. 7/89 under section 80(2) of the act against sag ram and the municipal board challenging the order of allotment d/-20-7-85 and the allotment letter d/-30-7-85 annex. r./6, wherein ..... allotted in favour of sag ram. it is is alleged that the said order was clearly against the provisions of the act and the rules of 1974. the then chairman, municipal board, nagaur also issued, subsequent order of allotment dated 30-7-1985 annex. r/6 in favour of respondent sag .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 1993 (HC)

Nizam and ors. Vs. Jaipur Development Authority and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-12-1993

Reported in : AIR1994Raj87; 1993(2)WLC169

..... made by the public persons, warranting immediate action towards this direction by the concerned public authorities. it should not be forgotten that the existence of public institutions like jda or municipal council/corporation, and their officers, are for public good and they have a statutory duty to develop, maintain, and lookafter properly such public places/sites which are meant for ..... : (1980 cri lj 1075); akil bharatiya soshit karamchari sangh (railway) v. union of india, air 1981 sc 298 : (1980 lab 1c 1325); azad rickshaw pullers union, amritsar v. state of punjab, air 1981 sc 14. this concept was further developed and extended in fertilizer corporation kamgar union v. union of india, air 1981 sc 344: (1980 lab ic 1367). however, the ..... or to a determinate class as group of individuals. what results in such case is public injury and it is one of the characteristics of public injury that the act or acts complained of cannotnecessarily be shown to affect the rights ofdeterminate or identifiable class or group ofpersons; public injury is an injury to anindeterminate class of persons. in these casesthe ..... the recreation and preservation of open spaces for parks and playgrounds cannot be sacrificed by leasing or selling such sites to private persons for conversion to some user. any such act would be contrary to the legislative intent and inconsistent with the statutory requirements. furthermore, it would be in direct conflict with the constitutional mandate to endure that any state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1993 (HC)

Jagrup Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Feb-18-1993

Reported in : AIR1993Raj157; 1993(2)WLC605

..... be in these annexures, is that the land in question is required for construction of sewerage plant and strips, within the municipal council, sriganganagar. in the first instance, after publication of notification under section 4 of the act, which was published on 11-9-1987, in the official gazette; the petitioner's co-licensee received a notice dated ..... declare'.29. for meanings of words 'declaration' and 'to declare', in webster's third new international dictionary (unabridged), the meaning of 'declaration' has been said to be:'the act of declaring, proclaiming, or publicly announcing: explicit assertion: formal proclamation'.the word 'declare' has been stated to mean:'to make known publicly; announce, proclaim or publish, especially by ..... by the high courts of gujarat, and panjab & haryana.14. with the aforesaid back-drop, for the first time, through land acquisition (amendment and validation) act, 1967 (hereinafter, called 'the act of 1967'), before the existing proviso to section 6(1), the proviso in the following terms was inserted :'.................................provided that no declaration in respect of any particular ..... compensation: (see section 24, seventhly). ...........two things are plain when we come to consider the construction of sections 4, 5a and 6. the first is that the act provides for acquisition of land of persons without their consent, and though compensation is paid for such acquisition; the fact however remains that land is acquired without the circumstances .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 1993 (HC)

Sangarsh Samiti Pradhan Adhyapak Madhyamik Vidhyalaya Vs. the State of ...

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-20-1993

Reported in : 1994(1)WLC756; 1993WLN(UC)468

..... . air 1975 sc 1455, lakshmi shanker, srivastava v. the state (delhi administration) : 1979crilj207 , hussainra khatoon and ors. v. home secretary, state of bihar, patna : 1979crilj1045 , the municipal corporation of delhi v. gurnam kaur : air1989sc38 the punjab land development and reclamation corporation limited, chandigarh v. the presiding officer, labour court chandigarh, and ors. 1990 (4) slr 154, state of u.p. and anr ..... maintainability of the joint petition has been raised by the office, which means that the present writ petition is maintainable. section 20 of the rajasthan court fee and suit valuation act, 1965, which deals with the manner in which the court fee is to be reckoned and provides that the fee payable under this ..... act shall be determined by computing it in accordance with the provisions of this chapter (chapter iv), chapter vi, chapter viii, schedule i, schedule ii. item ll(r) in schedule ii .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1993 (HC)

Smt. Harmindra Pal Kaur Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-20-1993

Reported in : 1993WLN(UC)344

..... territorial jurisdiction of university of ajmer has been defined so as to extent of the colleges in the entire territorial of state of rajasthan excluding the colleges situated in the municipal limits of the cities of udaipur and jodhpur, all agricultural colleges in the state, constituent colleges of the university of rajasthan, medical, engineering, ayurved, homeopathy, unani colleges in ..... , sri ganganagar as government nominee, shri ravi tikku, university nominee, shri r.s. sharma, reader hindi department, rajasthan university as an expert and shri ratan singh jaggi, reader, punjab university, patiala as an-other expert. the said university nominee, however, did not attend the meeting of the selection committee, which was held on 12.11.1988, wherein the candidates ..... institution, getting 90% aid from the state government under the grant-in-aid rules, 1983 and is governed by the provisions made for the affiliated colleges in the ajmer university act, statute and ordinance. the governor of rajasthan promulgated 'the university of ajmer ordinance, 1987 (ordinance no. 14 of 1987)' on the 23rd day of july, 1987 for ..... state government under the grant in aid rules, 1963. it is affiliated to the ajmer university and governed by the provisions made for the affiliated colleges in the ajmer university act, statute & ordinance. the managing committee, s.g.n. khalsa college, sri ganganagar (respondent no. 3) through its advertisements published in the daily tribune, chandigarh edition dated 9 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 1993 (HC)

Ramdeo Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jul-22-1993

Reported in : 1993WLN(UC)338

..... the learned single judge has not considered them. he has relied on smt. gunwant kaur and ors. v. municipal committee, bhatinda and ors. : air1970sc802 , madan mohan maharaj v. state of raj. and ors. 1978 vol. xxviii-342), sant lal bharti v. state of punjab : [1988]2scr107 and kavalappara kottarathil kochunni v. state of madras and ors. : air1959sc725 .3. on the other hand ..... court as has been held by a division bench of this court in rseb v. fateh chand 1988 rlr vol. 2-629 under section 33(2) of the i.d. act who will consider his case on the basis of evidence led by both the parties and will grant the petitioner adequate relief as regards the period he has undisputedly worked .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //