Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Sorted by: old Court: chennai Year: 1977 Page 1 of about 5 results (0.095 seconds)

Jul 22 1977 (HC)

S. Ramaswami Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-22-1977

Reported in : AIR1978Mad141

..... , the supreme court had to consider the scope of the words 'may reasonably be expected to let from year to year' occurring in section 3(1)(b) of the east punjab municipal act, 1911, and it was pointed out- 'thus, whatever may be our views on the reasonableness of tying down assessment, for the purposes of rating, to the concept of a rent which ..... of rent based upon fraud, emergency, relationship and such other considerations may take it out of the bounds of reasonableness.'in guntur municipal council v. rate payer's assn. : [1971]2scr423 construing section 82(2) of the madras district municipalities act, the supreme court pointed out that for determining the annual value of the buildings under the said section, the test essentially is ..... . speaking for the bench had expressed the view that though the fair rent fixed under the house rent control act may and ordinarily should be taken into consideration by the municipal authorities in computing the annual value under section 82 of the district municipalities act, they are not bound to take such fair rent as necessarily the rent for which the premises may reasonably ..... calcutta v. padma debi : [1962]3scr49 it was held that on a fair reading of section 127 (a) of the calcutta municipal act, 1923, the annual rent could not be fixed higher than the standard rent fixed under the rent control act. after quoting a passage from a judgment of the judicial committee of the privy council in bengal nagpur rly. co. ltd .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 1977 (HC)

S. Ramaswamy Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-22-1977

Reported in : (1977)2MLJ457

..... , the supreme court had to consider the scope of the words 'may reasonably be expected to be let from year to year' occurring in section 3(1)(b) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 and it was pointed out:thus, whatever may be our views on the reasonableness of tying down assessment, for the purposes of rating, to the concept of a rent which ..... rate of rent based upon fraud, emergency, relationship and such other considerations may take it out of the bonds of reasonableness.in guntur municipal council v. ratepayers' association : [1971]2scr423 , construing section 82(2) of the madras district municipalities act, the supreme court pointed out that for determining the annual value of the buildings under the said section the test essentially is what ..... ., speaking for the bench had expressed the view that though the fair rent fixed under the house rent control act may and ordinarily should be taken into consideration by the municipal authorities in computing the annual value under section 82 of the district municipalities act, they are not bound to take such fair rent as necessarily the rent for which the premises may reasonably ..... v. smt. padma debt : [1962]3scr49 , it was held that on a fair reading of section 127(a) of the calcutta municipal act, 1923, the annual rent could not be fixed higher than the standard rent fixed under the rent control act. after quoting a passage from a judgment of the judicial committee of the privy council in bengal nagpur rly. co. ltd .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 1977 (HC)

V. Bapu Kalingarayar Vs. Rajam and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-09-1977

Reported in : AIR1978Mad192

..... statement of the25th june, 1906'.this decision of the lahore high court has been followed by achhru ram, j., of the east punjab high court in thakar das v. sant ram in rejecting the contention urged before him that the plaintiff having claimed exemption from the law of limitation ..... plaint ......... we agree with the interpretation put upon the law in yukub ebrahim v. bai rahimatbai : (1908)10bomlr346 and hingu miah v. heramba chandra (1911) 13 cal lj 139 and consider that the plaintiffs should not be debarred from putting forward the admission of the defendants made by them in their written ..... sue upon the promissory note; but that does not mean that a declaration of this kind will be futile. under other provisions of the trustee act, the beneficiary can sue for the execution of the trust by compelling the trustee to take the necessary steps and have a receiver appointed in the ..... on the ground of part payment of the principal cannot be permitted to claim exemption on the ground of acknowledgment under section 19 of the limitation act.4. the next decision relied upon by the learned counsel for the respondents is of a bench of the bombay high court in gunnaji bhavaji v ..... it constitutes an express promise to pay the barred debt and it is not a void agreement in view of section 25(3) of the contract act. the trial court dismissed that application and another application filed on the same date to reopen the case observing that the proposed amendment seeking to rely .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 1977 (HC)

K. Mohideen Ibrahim Vs. M. Muhammed Abdullah

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-21-1977

Reported in : AIR1978Mad97; (1978)1MLJ386

..... the police. on 23-5-1973, the plaintiff received a copy of the order, dated 21-3-1'973, passed by the commissioner of the municipality granting permission to the defendant to put up constructions. he directed the plaintiff to seek, his remedy in a civil court. according to the plaintiff, ..... settling their disputes either with the aid of mediators or through a competent court. overruling the objections raised by the plaintiff, the commissioner of virudhunagar. municipality granted permission to the defendant to put up constructions. in pursuance of that permission, the defendant started digging up the grounds to lay the foundation ..... been introduced deliberately for the purpose of putting forward a false claim to the suit wall. the defendant applied to the virudhunagar municipality for reconstruction of his building. he filed a plan showing the suit well as a common wall. the plaintiff sent a petition to the commissioner ..... of virudhunagar municipality objecting to the issue of permission to the defendant for putting up constructions in such a manner as to affect his right to the ..... because he mistakenly supposes that he is the owner of the land or asserts that his act of enjoyment is sufficient to give him the ownership by prescription.' similarly in venkata varaha dikshithar v. subbarya pillai, (1911) 2 mad wn 95 it was held that 'a false belief of ownership does not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 1977 (HC)

S. Subramanian Vs. V. Vellaikaanu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-23-1977

Reported in : (1978)1MLJ550

..... state legislature. anantanarayanan, cj., with whom ramakrishnan, j., agreed except for giving some more reasons, held that the exercise of the power conferred by section 41 of the madras district municipalities act is essentially an administrative power, in which the exercise of the power depends on the subjective satisfaction of government and that the decision is subject to the quasi-judicial process ..... he presses in his report.14. the supreme court was concerned in radeshyam v. state of madhya pradesh : [1959]1scr1440 . with section 53-a of the c.p. and berar municipalities act, 1922, according to which, if a committee is not competent to perform the duties imposed on it or undertaken by it by or under the provisions of that ..... government. a full bench of the punjab and haryana high court in state v. bhagat ram , which came up for consideration before the supreme court, in their judgment held that the order of the state government removing ..... be a recital in the order itself before it can be validly made.there is an observation to the same effect in the decision in bhagat ram v. state of punjab : [1973]1scr92 , which also was relied upon by mr. venugopal. in that case, an order removing a person from the membership of a committee had been passed by the state .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //