Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Sorted by: old Year: 1977 Page 1 of about 103 results (0.094 seconds)

Mar 11 1977 (SC)

Bata Shoe Co. Ltd. Vs. City of Jabalpur Corporation

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-11-1977

Reported in : AIR1977SC955; (1977)2SCC472; [1977]3SCR182

..... and higher rate in respect of salt of other kinds, imposed tax at the higher rate on 'sambhar salt' which was a variety of common salt. section 86 of the punjab municipal act, 1911, provided that the liability of any person to be taxed cannot be questioned in any manner or by any authority other than that provided in the ..... act. that provision is identical with section 84(3) of the c.p. municipalities act, 1922, with which we are concerned in the instant case. section 86(2) of the punjab act provided that no refund of any tax shall be claimed by any person otherwise than in ..... in the civil court. on the question of limitation the high court held that applying the special period of limitation provided in section 48 of the central provinces and berar municipalities act, 1922 the suit was within limitation as regards the payment made by the plaintiffs on september 22, 1948 but that it was barred by limitation as regards the payment made ..... accordance with the provisions of the act and the rules thereunder. it was held by this court that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 1977 (HC)

Bhagwanti and ors. Vs. Shiv Dei and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-15-1977

Reported in : ILR1977Delhi761

..... 2), a notification had been issued by the chief commissioner, delhi, declaring certain areas as municipality of the second class under section 4(6) of the punjab municipal act, 1911. this notification was issued to various authorities. on 5th april, 1954 the municipal committee, which was known as south delhi municipal committee vide ex. dwii/3 proposed to levy a house-tax on the owners of ..... the building and lands within the municipality as provided by section 61 of the punjab municipal act and the proposal was accepted on ..... 11th april, 1954. on 27th december, 1954 the aforesaid municipal committee took over the sanitary services of the area (vide ex. dw11/4) and the said proposal was ..... accepted on 10th january, 1955. it is true that as a matter of law, the mere fact that a municipality has been constituted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 1977 (HC)

S. Ramaswamy Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-22-1977

Reported in : (1977)2MLJ457

..... , the supreme court had to consider the scope of the words 'may reasonably be expected to be let from year to year' occurring in section 3(1)(b) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 and it was pointed out:thus, whatever may be our views on the reasonableness of tying down assessment, for the purposes of rating, to the concept of a rent which ..... rate of rent based upon fraud, emergency, relationship and such other considerations may take it out of the bonds of reasonableness.in guntur municipal council v. ratepayers' association : [1971]2scr423 , construing section 82(2) of the madras district municipalities act, the supreme court pointed out that for determining the annual value of the buildings under the said section the test essentially is what ..... ., speaking for the bench had expressed the view that though the fair rent fixed under the house rent control act may and ordinarily should be taken into consideration by the municipal authorities in computing the annual value under section 82 of the district municipalities act, they are not bound to take such fair rent as necessarily the rent for which the premises may reasonably ..... v. smt. padma debt : [1962]3scr49 , it was held that on a fair reading of section 127(a) of the calcutta municipal act, 1923, the annual rent could not be fixed higher than the standard rent fixed under the rent control act. after quoting a passage from a judgment of the judicial committee of the privy council in bengal nagpur rly. co. ltd .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 1977 (HC)

S. Ramaswami Vs. the Commissioner, Corporation of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-22-1977

Reported in : AIR1978Mad141

..... , the supreme court had to consider the scope of the words 'may reasonably be expected to let from year to year' occurring in section 3(1)(b) of the east punjab municipal act, 1911, and it was pointed out- 'thus, whatever may be our views on the reasonableness of tying down assessment, for the purposes of rating, to the concept of a rent which ..... of rent based upon fraud, emergency, relationship and such other considerations may take it out of the bounds of reasonableness.'in guntur municipal council v. rate payer's assn. : [1971]2scr423 construing section 82(2) of the madras district municipalities act, the supreme court pointed out that for determining the annual value of the buildings under the said section, the test essentially is ..... . speaking for the bench had expressed the view that though the fair rent fixed under the house rent control act may and ordinarily should be taken into consideration by the municipal authorities in computing the annual value under section 82 of the district municipalities act, they are not bound to take such fair rent as necessarily the rent for which the premises may reasonably ..... calcutta v. padma debi : [1962]3scr49 it was held that on a fair reading of section 127 (a) of the calcutta municipal act, 1923, the annual rent could not be fixed higher than the standard rent fixed under the rent control act. after quoting a passage from a judgment of the judicial committee of the privy council in bengal nagpur rly. co. ltd .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 1977 (SC)

New Delhi Municipal Committee Vs. the Life Insurance Corporation of In ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-09-1977

Reported in : AIR1977SC2134; 1994(4)SCALE390; (1977)4SCC84; [1978]1SCR279

..... in regard to the amendment made in the list of 1967-68. the other writ petition too was allowed except for the year 1966-67.5. chapter v of the punjab municipal act, 1911 deals with 'taxation'. section 61(1)(a) thereof authorises imposition of a tax payable by the owners on buildings and lands. section 62 provides that the ..... . the l.i.c. paid the tax as assessed for these years but in february 1968 it received five notices from the municipal committee stating, that in exercise of the powers conferred by section 67 of the punjab municipal act, 3 of 1911, it had decided by a resolution dated january 27, 1968 to amend the lists of assessment for the aforesaid five years by ..... earliest day of the official year current when the amendment is made. we do not think that there is any parallel between section 82(3) of the bombay act and section 87 of the punjab municipal act.21. for these reasons we allow these appeals and set aside the judgment of the high court. the writ petitions filed by the respondents will, as a ..... a particular provision of a statute the court must consider other parts of that statute and read the statute as a whole. we have discussed the entire scheme of the punjab municipal act and have pointed out how on a consideration of its various provisions it is not possible to sustain the view taken by the high court.19. in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1977 (HC)

State of Punjab and ors. Vs. Amrit Banaspati Co., Ltd. and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-25-1977

Reported in : AIR1977P& H268

..... the decision dated 15-12-1966 of the cabinet sub-committee and thirdly, because it would be opposed to the scheme and purpose of the punjab general sales tax act as well as general social and public policy. letters patent appeal no. 368 of 1975 is allowed and civil writ no. 1588 of 1972 ..... the writ petition should have been dismissed in limine. the matter was remanded to the high court with a direction to issue a rule to the municipality and the government and to dispose of the petition. in the course of the discussion, the supreme court made certain observations which must naturally be understood ..... the parry claiming the estoppel justifies it or where the general interests of the state require it.40. century spinning and manufacturing co. v. ulhas nagar municipality (air 1971 sc 1021), was a case where the high court of bombay had dismissed a writ petition in limine without assigning any reason. it was ..... were not referred to in ram kumar's case, (air 1976 sc 2237). the first case that requires to be noticed is collector of bombay v. municipal corporation of the city of bombay, 1952 scr 43: (air 1951 sc 469). the facts of the case were as follows: in 1865, the government ..... under article 226 of the constitution, (vide union of india v. indo-afghan agencies, air 1968 sc 718. century spinning and manufacturing co. v. ulhas nagar municipality, air 1971 sc 1021). nor is it correct to say that administrative orders cannot confer rights enforceable by a mandamus, (vide union of india v. k.p .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 1977 (HC)

Man Mohan Tuli and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-27-1977

Reported in : ILR1977Delhi643

..... to augment their meagre resources. it would beuseful to remember in this context that before the municipal corporation was set up in delhi the erstwhile delhi municipal committee was collecting taxes on the entry of goods in the local area in accordance with the provisions of the punjab municipal act which, by the very nature of that statute, was confined to the provincial list and ..... ground that a substantial part of the property admittedly falls in the union territory of delhi and, thereforee, within the local area of the municipal corporation of delhi. (5) section 178 of the municipal corporation act, 1957 (for short, the act) provides that 'there shall be levied on all goods carried by railway or road into the union territory of delhi from any place ..... the official gazette'. it is not disputed that pursuant to the provisions of section 179 the municipal corporation of delhi has been authorised as the terminal tax collecting agency by the central government. in exercise of powers conferred by section 183 and 479 of the act the central government also promulgated the delhi terminal tax rules, 1958 (for short, the rules) which ..... outside thereof, a terminal tax. . . .' section 179 of the act further provides that such tax shall be payable on demand and shall be collected by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1977 (HC)

Kewal Krishan Puri and anr. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-28-1977

Reported in : AIR1977P& H347

..... for carrying out the various obligations imposed on it by the calcutta municipal act. no such power has been given to the market committees bv the legislature to impose a tax to raise revenue for carrying out the objects of the act and the ratio of the decision in liberty cinema's case does ..... np. tor every one hundred rupees. later on, section 23 had been the subject-matter of several amendments. by the punjab agricultural produce markets (amendment) act, 1969 (punjab act no. 25 of 1969), copy annexure p.1, the market fee was fixed at re. 1.00 per one hundred rupees. by ..... rupees 30 lakhs have been contributed for the chief minister's flood relief fund by the board and the market committees.' 'annexure 'w-11': the punjab state agricultural marketing board has decided to set up two ginning factories and six rice shellers in the state in the near future.' 'annexure 'w- ..... to quash the enhancement in the fee. it may, however, be observed' that during the course of arguments affidavit of shri tirath singh, chairman, punjab state agricultural marketing board was placed on the file, which was not objected to by the learned counsel for the petitioners. from its perusal, i find ..... deposit all their amounts in the government treasury in the year 1974, that the agricultural board and the committee had given rupees five crores to the punjab state co-operative supply and marketing federation (known as 'markfed') without charging any interest and the loan is interest-free, because this money was .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 1977 (HC)

Salim and Co. and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-02-1977

Reported in : 1978CriLJ240

..... issued by the director after the analysis of the sample has been carried out. this view has also been taken by a division bench of the punjab & haryana high court in municipal committee, amritsar v. shadi lai (1975) 2, f. a. c. 411 : . same was the view of a single bench of the ..... and conclusive in evidence of the facts stated therein.9. the scope of sub-section (5) of section 13 o the act was also considered in a full bench case of this court. municipal corporation of delhi v. bishan sarup 1972, f. a. c. 273, in the following terms:held that once the ..... the central food laboratory and thereafter concrete and definite result would have been received. this contention is devoid of any substance as the provisions of the act do not envisage the examination of the same sample twice. the reason being that sub-section (5) of section 13 provides that 'the certificate received ..... whether, in view of the certificate of the director of central food laboratory, the first charge against the petitioners is groundless. section 11 of the act prescribes the procedure to be followed by a food inspector while taking a sample of an article of food for analysis. according to this section, the ..... food inspector. the public analyst reported that the sample was adulterated. a complaint under section 7 read with section 16 of the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954, was filed against salim and company, zehuruddin, from whom the sample was taken and also against salim ahmed, washim ahmed and mst. zubeda begum .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 09 1977 (SC)

Krishan Murari Lal Sehgal Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-09-1977

Reported in : AIR1977SC1233; 1977LabIC554; (1977)ILLJ442SC; (1977)2SCC587; [1977]2SCR956

..... are, however, unable to see how this memorandum of may 11, 1957, can be called in aid as 'previous approval' under section 115 (7) of the act when the punjab financial commissioner's office (state service class iii) rules, 1957 were already promulgated on february 28, 1957. approval under section 115 (7) is previous approval and not subsequent ratification. the ..... his highness the rajpramukh, which is the previous day of the 'appointed day' under the states reorganisation act, 1956. thus he was integrated in the new state of punjab as a confirmed assistant. before his integration in punjab he was governed by the patiala and east punjab states union civil services (punishment and appeal) rules, 1953 (briefly the pepsu rules) which were made in ..... appointing, authority of the appellant before his integration into the state of punjab does not come into the picture. he adds that this (submission of his is in consonance with the provisions of section 116 of the states reorganisation act, 1956 (briefly the act). we may, therefore, read section 116 of the act:116 (1) every person who immediately before the appointed day is ..... argument that in the new state of punjab the financial commissioner (revenue) is the appropriate authority for appointing assistants is absolutely irrelevant in the context of section 116 (1) which enables the status quo ante to continue except where the post ceases to exist under the provisions of the act. it is also important to bear in mind the provisions of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //