Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-22-1977
Reported in : AIR1978Delhi146; 14(1978)DLT132
..... union territories, the respective high courts which have been given jurisdiction over the union territories. (b) under the repealed s. 26 of the original patents & designs act, 1911, a petition for revocation of a patent could be made before 'a high court', meaning any high court as defined in s. 2(7). though s. 51 ..... under s. 51-a could be made only by the high court of calcutta. (c) under the repealed s. 34 of the patents and designs act, 1911, a high court could dismiss a petition presented to it under the repealed s. 26, if in its opinion the petition could be disposed of more justly ..... the petitioner's house should be given effect to even though no individual interest of the petitioner was injured by the delay on the part of the municipal corporation in implementing the said resolution. for, the petitioner lived very near the site of the children's park and was more interested than an ..... territory of the laccadive, minicoy and amindivi islands, the high court of kerala; (ee) in relation to the union territory of chandigarh, the high court of punjab and haryana; (f) in relation to the union territories of dadra and nagar haveli and goa, daman and diu, the high court at bombay; (g) ..... in relation to the union territory of delhi, the high court of delhi; (bb) in relation to the union territory of himachal pradesh, the high court of punjab and haryana up to and inclusive of the 30th april, 1967 and the high court of delhi thereafter; (c) in relation to the union territory of manipur .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Dec-23-1977
Reported in : (1978)1MLJ550
..... state legislature. anantanarayanan, cj., with whom ramakrishnan, j., agreed except for giving some more reasons, held that the exercise of the power conferred by section 41 of the madras district municipalities act is essentially an administrative power, in which the exercise of the power depends on the subjective satisfaction of government and that the decision is subject to the quasi-judicial process ..... he presses in his report.14. the supreme court was concerned in radeshyam v. state of madhya pradesh : 1scr1440 . with section 53-a of the c.p. and berar municipalities act, 1922, according to which, if a committee is not competent to perform the duties imposed on it or undertaken by it by or under the provisions of that ..... government. a full bench of the punjab and haryana high court in state v. bhagat ram , which came up for consideration before the supreme court, in their judgment held that the order of the state government removing ..... be a recital in the order itself before it can be validly made.there is an observation to the same effect in the decision in bhagat ram v. state of punjab : 1scr92 , which also was relied upon by mr. venugopal. in that case, an order removing a person from the membership of a committee had been passed by the state .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Dec-27-1977
Reported in : AIR1978AP333
..... the enhancement of the tax. it was pointed out that no prior opportunity had been given to the ratepayer as required under rule 6 of schedule ii of the 1965 municipalities act before the enhancement of tax by way of special notice. dealing with these objection, we pointed out that the learned single judge, who had dismissed the writ petitions, rejected the ..... the petitioner to make his representation as to the estimated or reported rental value. the procedure laid down by s. 95 and r. 6 of sch. ii of the 1965 municipalities act had not been complied with. it was in this manner that the principles of natural justice had been violated. when this was complained of, so argued sri koteswara rao, we ..... was applicable. this view found favour with kuppuswami, j. that apart, the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner was that the municipality acted illegally in assessing and enhancing the tax on the basis of estimated or reported rental value while it should have made it one the basis of the standard rent. it ..... we must refer to some other decisions placed before us by the learned counsel for the petitioner. in n. s. transport co. v. state of punjab, : 2scr218 a bald notice under the motor vehicles act was issued without making any reference to any particular permit for cancellation or suspension of which action had been taken. it contained nothing but general allegations .....Tag this Judgment!