Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Year: 1969 Page 1 of about 112 results (0.133 seconds)

Apr 10 1969 (HC)

The State of Punjab Vs. Bhagat Ram Patanga

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-10-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H9

..... sub-divisional officer (civil). in consequence of the behaviour of the respondents in that meeting the appellant proceeded against each under section 16(1)(e) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 (punjab act 3 of 1911), hereinafter referred to as 'the act', by issuing a show-cause notice, annexure 'a' with each of the two petitions by the respondents, bhagat ram patanga and om parkash agnihotri, on ..... to obey the chair. by your aforesaid action you have flagrantly abused your position as a member of the committee within the meaning of section 16(1)(e) of the punjab municipal act, 1911. i am directed to call upon you to show cause under proviso to section 16(1)(e) ibid, why you should not be removed from the membership of the ..... patanga respondent, the following order was made against him on september 11, 1962 -- 'whereas the governor of punjab after giving an opportunity to shri bhagat ram patanga, member. municipal committee, phagwara of tendering an explanation under the proviso to section 16 of the punjab municipal act, 1911, is satisfied that the said shri bhagat ram patanga has flagrantly abused his position as a member of ..... the aforesaid committee: now, therefore, in exercise of the powers vested in him under clause (e) of sub-section (1) of section 16 ibid, the governor of punjab is pleased to remove the said shri .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 1969 (SC)

Municipal Committee, Amritsar and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and anr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-12-1969

Reported in : AIR1970SC2182; (1969)2SCC823; [1970]2SCR375

..... in the manner specified in the schedule appended to this act with effect from the 1st october, 1957.section 52(1) of the punjab municipal act relates to the setting apart of the municipal funds and apply the same for different purposes ..... the committee within the municipal limits of the town of amritsar for which it was getting grant-in-aid from the ..... 2) & (3)....section 6 'amendment of punjab acts no. ill of 1911 and no. xx of 1883.-where a local authority has passed a resolution under section 3 or the state government has taken over management of aided schools of a local authority under section 5, the punjab municipal act, 1911, and the punjab district boards act, 1883, shall be deemed to have been amended ..... challenged.2. the appellant committee is a first class municipal committee and has been in existence from a long time. it has been managing its local affairs through the elected representatives from the city who are called municipal commissioners. it is constituted and functions under the provisions of the punjab municipal act 1911. a number of primary schools were being run by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 1969 (SC)

State of Haryana Vs. Mohanlal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-30-1969

Reported in : AIR1970SC1848; (1969)3SCC484; [1970]3SCR202

..... three trustees appointed by the state government under this section shall cease to be members of the trust.12. reading section 1(3) and section 4a of the act, and section 238 of the punjab municipal act, 1911, together, it seems to us that the true meaning of the latter portion of sub-section (3) of section 1 is that when the government applies the ..... to the municipal committee on the trust under clause (b) of sub-section (1) of section 4 shall be filled ..... this behalf in such notification; and the trust shall be deemed to be dissolved accordingly.7. it appears that on the supersession of the municipality of rohtak in 1954 an administration was appointed under section 238 of the punjab municipal act, 1911. this section, inter alia, provides:238. (1)...(2) when a committee is so superseded, the following consequences shall ensue:(a)...(b) all powers ..... 4-a of the act was not brought to its notice and if it had been brought to its notice the high court may well have come to the contrary conclusion. section 4-a, which was inserted by punjab act viii of 1936 reads :4-a. during the period of supersession of a municipal committee under section 238 of the punjab municipal act, 1911, the three seats allotted .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 28 1969 (HC)

New Delhi Municipal Committee Vs. the Punjab National Bank Limited

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-28-1969

Reported in : ILR1986Delhi292

..... from april 1, 1959 byincluding it in the aforesaid assessment list for 1959-60. this notice was issued in purported exercise of powers of amendment under section 67 of the punjab municipal act, 1911. afterhearing objections, the appellant passed a resolution on november 20, 1959 confirming the proposed assessment. on december 21, 1959, the appellant sent a bill to the respondent for rs. 63 ..... nto entered in the assessment list prepared during the period 1-4-1958 to 31-3-1959. on september 4, 1959 the new delhi municipal committee purporting to act under section 67 of the punjab municipal act, 1911, hereafter referred to as the act, issued the following notice to the owner, hereafter called the respondent. 'thisis to inform you that your building mentioned at the back of ..... a single bench decision of bombay high court in. the decision turns on the interpretation of sections 78 and 82 of the bombay municipal boroughs act 18 of 1925 which are entirely different from the provisions in the punjab municipal act, 1911 with which we are concerned in this case.(24)the last case relied upon by the learned counsel for the respondent is a decision ..... included in the assessment list in the previous year although it was in existence in that year can be added to the list by amendment under section 67 of the punjab municipal act, 1911 in the year for which house-tax is payable. the question involves the interpretation of sections 61 to 68 of the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 1969 (HC)

Raj Kumar and ors. Vs. the New Delhi Municipal Committee, New Delhi an ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-29-1969

Reported in : ILR1970Delhi244

..... possession of the shops. further, the contract with the petitioners was itself inchoate. it had to be concluded by the execution of the license deeds section 47(1) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 also requires that the contract with the respondent had to be made in writing and must be signed by two members of whom the president or vice-president is one ..... so on what terms (2) alternatively, whether the petitioners are entitled to grant of leases on such conditions as the state government may specify under section 176-a of the punjab municipal act, 1911. (1) the petitioners were licensees in the old stalls on irwin road occupied by them. similarly the accommodation in the mohan singh place offered to the petitioners was also only ..... do nto state in the writ petition, which particular terms of the license deed were nto acceptable to them. the petitioners further aver that under section 176-a of the punjab municipal act, 1911, the respondent was bound to create leases in the favor, but the petitions did nto state whether the said provision of law was applicable to delhi and if so, whether ..... contract between them and the respondent. they have, thereforee, no contractual right to the possession of the shops in the mohan singh place. (2) the punjab municipal act, 1911 was applied to delhi long before 1950. subsequent acts of the punjab legislature amending the said act do nto become applicable to delhi unless they are specifically made so applicable. section 176-a was inserted in the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 1969 (HC)

Bhagat Ram Patanga Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-29-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H110

..... of phagwara and on that account a show cause notice was given to either under the proviso to section 16(1) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 (punjab act 3 of 1911), why either be not removed from the membership of the municipality for having flagrantly abused his position as a member or it. the applicants gave their replies to the show-cause notices. after that the state ..... reasons for its order, and such an order having been made in each case, a notification was issued in the terms of section 16 of the act removing each applicant from the membership of the municipality. so the appeals of the state government were accepted, and the petitions of the applicants under article 226 of the constitution were dismissed. these are two ..... elections for a stated period. in the writ petitions by the applicants a learned single judge was or the opinion that their conduct taken as such did not amount to flagrant abuse of their position as municipal commissioners. so the writ petitions were accepted and the orders of ..... government proceeded to remove them from the membership of the municipality and to impose a disqualification in the terms of section 16 of the act from contesting municipal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 03 1969 (SC)

S.M. Ram Lal and Co. Vs. Secretary to Government of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-03-1969

Reported in : 1969(2)LC373(SC)

..... by that act power to impose taxes specified in sub-section (1). sub-section (2) of section 61 provides : 'save as provided in the ..... of punjab. the high court rejected the petition holding that wool was brought by the appellants within the limits of the notified area committee of faridabad township for 'use' and octroi was on that account properly leviable. 2 the notified area committee, faridabad township, is a municipality for the purposes of the punjab municipal act, 1911. section 61 of the punjab municipal act confers upon the municipality governed ..... of goods into a local area for consumption, use or sale therein by virtue of sec. 61(2) of the punjab municipal act the power to levy octroi is therefore exercisable, with the previous sanction of the state government, by the municipalities. but octroi may be levied on the entry of goods into a local area for consumption, use or sale therein. ..... 4. our attention was invited to a judgment of the federal court in the punjab flour and general mills co. ltd. lahore v. the chief officer, corporation of the city of lahore and the province of the punjab (1) where the right of the lahore municipality to levy a tax on the entry of wheat was raised. it was observed in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 14 1969 (HC)

Technological Institute of Textile Vs. Labour Court and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-14-1969

Reported in : (1970)ILLJ188P& H

..... , kharar, ... is incompetent to petform and has persistently made defaults in the performance of duties imposed on it by or under the punjab municipal act, 1911.i am wholly unable to accede to this contention. the reasons required as a condition precedent by section 238 to be stated in a valid notification superseding a committee, in ..... punj., 430], wherein while dealing with a somewhat similar question relating to the requirement of recording reasons in support of an order under section 238 of the punjab municipal act (3 of 1911) for superseding a municipal committee, i held as follows:the first question that calls fet determination in the above circumstances is whether merely repeating the words of the section amounts to giving ..... that the reasons and the conclusion arrived at on account of a consideration of those reasons are two distinct matters. the repeating of the conclusion necessary to supersede a municipality under section 238 of the act cannot possibly be equated to the reasons impelling such a decision. the scheme of the section itself shows that the legislature has specifically provided that a ..... and transferred to the labour court, jullundur;now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 33b of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (14 of 1947), the governor of punjab is pleased to withdraw the proceedings in respect of the aforesaid industrial dispute from the labour court, rohtak, and transfer the same to the labour court, jullundur .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 15 1969 (HC)

Ram Niwas Gupta and ors. Vs. State of Haryana Through Secy., Local Sel ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-15-1969

Reported in : AIR1970P& H462

..... passed in a special meeting of the committee held on that date and was referred to the punjab state for confirmation under section 70(2) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 (hereinafter called the act). the punjab government confirmed the resolution by a memorandum dated may 4, 1954.4. the municipal committee, bahadurgarh, reconsidered the matter in a meeting held on may 8. 1954 and by resolution ..... no. 1 of that date decided to levy octroi on the goods imported into fateh mandi but this resolution was annulled by the punjab government ..... in exercise of its power under section 236 of the act and a copy of that order was communicated to the president, municipal committee, by endorsement no. 2768-cc-54/11442, dated may 17, 1954. since the examiner, local ..... fund accounts, punjab, was insisting on the levy of octroi on the goods imported into fateh mandi, bahadurgarh, the representatives of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 26 1969 (HC)

Arjun Khimji Ginning and Pressing Co. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Nov-26-1969

Reported in : (1971)73BOMLR861

..... bench was justified on these grounds in refusing to follow the decision of the supreme court, in bharat kala bhandar's case. firm radha kishan v. ludhiana municipality was a case under the punjab municipal act, 1911. under the punjab government notification no. 26463, dated july 21, 1.932, terminal tax was payable under item 68 of the schedule to the said notification at the rate ..... above paragraph will show that this passage does not contain the ratio of the judgment. what it merely does is to summarise and briefly set out the scheme of the punjab municipal act and poses' the question which arose for determination of the court. the ratio of the judgment in firm radha kishm's case is to be found in para. 9 of ..... judgment is that it does not deal with the provisions of the c.p. and berar municipalities act with which the division bench in the case of muni. committee, malkapur v. ballabhdas, and we in. the present petition, are concerned. it deals with a different act, namely, the punjab municipal act. secondly, the bare recital of facts itself shows that the question in firm radha kishan ..... 's case was not with respect to the jurisdiction of the municipal committee to levy a tax, nor with respect to the constitutionality of a tax imposed by .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //