Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Year: 1993 Page 7 of about 246 results (0.106 seconds)

Apr 12 1993 (HC)

Nizam and ors. Vs. Jaipur Development Authority and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Apr-12-1993

Reported in : AIR1994Raj87; 1993(2)WLC169

..... made by the public persons, warranting immediate action towards this direction by the concerned public authorities. it should not be forgotten that the existence of public institutions like jda or municipal council/corporation, and their officers, are for public good and they have a statutory duty to develop, maintain, and lookafter properly such public places/sites which are meant for ..... : (1980 cri lj 1075); akil bharatiya soshit karamchari sangh (railway) v. union of india, air 1981 sc 298 : (1980 lab 1c 1325); azad rickshaw pullers union, amritsar v. state of punjab, air 1981 sc 14. this concept was further developed and extended in fertilizer corporation kamgar union v. union of india, air 1981 sc 344: (1980 lab ic 1367). however, the ..... or to a determinate class as group of individuals. what results in such case is public injury and it is one of the characteristics of public injury that the act or acts complained of cannotnecessarily be shown to affect the rights ofdeterminate or identifiable class or group ofpersons; public injury is an injury to anindeterminate class of persons. in these casesthe ..... the recreation and preservation of open spaces for parks and playgrounds cannot be sacrificed by leasing or selling such sites to private persons for conversion to some user. any such act would be contrary to the legislative intent and inconsistent with the statutory requirements. furthermore, it would be in direct conflict with the constitutional mandate to endure that any state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1993 (HC)

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Vs. S.V. Naik and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-18-1993

Reported in : 1993(2)BomCR575; (1993)IILLJ373Bom; 1993(1)MhLj721

..... end of even the maximum permissible period of probation. this decision also, therefore, has no application to the facts of the present case. 7. in municipal corporation v. ashok kumar misra (supra), the supreme court again considered the scope of the power of the employer to extend the period of probation. ..... 8. the last decision on which reliance was placed by the learned counsel for the respondent is the decision of the supreme court in state of punjab v. dharam singh (1968) 34 fjr 408. the ration of this decision is that where the first appointment or promotion is made for a ..... unsatisfactory services during the period of probation amounted to unfair labor practice within the meaning of item 9 of schedule iv of the mrtu & pulp act. in view of this finding, the industrial court allowed the complaint and set aside the order of the corporation dated november 12, 1987 reverting mrs ..... the substantive post during the period of probation was challenged by the union representing the petitioner by way of complaint under the mrtu & pulp act before the industrial court. both the parties filed joint purshis stating that they did not desire to adduce any oral evidence in the complaint and ..... and (d) of schedule ii and item 9 of schedule iv of the maharashtra recognition of trade union and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971 (mrtu & pulp act). by the said order, the industrial court allowed the complaint of the trade union and set aside the order of the petitioner corporation reverting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 1993 (HC)

M/S. Cyrus Investment (P) Ltd., Hyderabad and Another Vs. Mohd. Fareed ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-21-1993

Reported in : AIR1994AP199; 1993(3)ALT246

..... implead any person interested in the controversy pending before the court provided the nature of the dispute referred to is not enlarged or altered.'5. in municipality, nalgonda v. hakeem mohiuddin, : air1964ap305 a division bench of this court observed (at pp. 307, 308):'once a reference is made, the ..... the learned counsel for the petitioner contented that except the patna high court, all the other high courts, viz., mysore, allahabad, calcutta, andhra pradesh, punjab and haryana high courts, have held thata person who is not a party before the land acquisition officer cannot invoke the provisions of o.1, r. ..... a reference made by the collector under s. 30 of the land acquisition act. the learned judge entirely agreed with the views expressed by the calcutta and andhra pradesh high courts in manjur ahmed v. rajlakshmi, : air1956cal263 (cited supra) and municipality, nalgonda v. hakeem mohiuddin : air1964ap305 .10. in basalingappa v. nagamma, ..... been referred to by the collector.9. in niranjan singh v. amar singh, a learned single judge of the punjab high court held that a person who had not filed any claim in response to a notice issued under s. 9 of the land acquisition ..... act. in this context, the language that has been used in s. 30 for reference is identical with reference to the language used in s. 18. considering the views expressed by the supreme court in the cases referred to above as well as the views expressed by the allahabad, mysore, kerala, andhra pradesh, calcutta, punjab .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 15 1993 (HC)

Surjit Singh Vs. Waryam Singh and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-15-1993

Reported in : 1994ACJ505

..... assessed at rs. 836.50. the award was upheld by placing reliance upon a division bench judgment of gujarat high court in bharat premjibhai v. municipal corporation, ahmedabad 1979 acj 264 (gujarat), wherein it was held that damages are awardable even for gratuitous services rendered by a close relative. we may ..... been observed in some of the judgments that proper procedure which should be followed is to allow the claimant to amend the petition.18. in municipal corporation of greater bombay v. kisan gangaram hire 1987 acj 311 (bombay), division bench of bombay high court was dealing with a case where ..... pradesh. in those areas, which were merged, on coming into force of the punjab reorganisation act on and from 1st november, 1966, with union territory of himachal pradesh by taking out those areas from the state of punjab, the punjab motor vehicles rules are applicable.17. under both sets of the rules, a ..... , 1960, framed by the authority of the lt. governor of himachal pradesh in exercise of powers conferred by section 111-a of the motor vehicles act, 1939, as published in the himachal pradesh rajpatra (extraordinary) on 25th november, 1960, at page 275 are in operation in that part of the ..... copy of the report sent to it by a police officer, under section 160, regarding an accident, to be an application for compensation under the act.15. section 168 enjoins upon the claims tribunal, on receipt of an application, after hearing the parties and recording evidence, to make an award determining .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 07 1993 (HC)

Ram Sarup Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-07-1993

Reported in : AIR1993P& H204

..... and general mills, thanesar, district kurukshetra, seeking quashing of the notification dated 26th june, 1980 under s. 4( i xb) of the punjab scheduled roads and controlled areas restriction of unregulated development act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as the 'act') and the complaint filed in pursuance thereof.2. briefly the facts giving rise to the present appeal are as follows:-1. there is ..... 18. in the circumstances, we cannot accept the contention raised on behalf of the appellant. the notification issued by the government is a valid notification under s. 4 of the act. the appeal is consequently dismissed. the parties are directed to bear their own costs. the parties are further directed to appear before the magistrate kurukshetra where the criminal complaint is ..... by the haryana government on 26th june. 1980, which was published on 29th july, 1980 under the act. on 25th august. 1980, an application was submitted for sanction of the said constructions and it has been alleged that on 16th september, 1980, the municipal engineer certified that there was no objection to the installation of singla industries on salarpur road. when the ..... a single rice and general mills situated in thanesar, district kurukshetra. ram sarup, petitioner, is a partner of the same. this mill was constructed in the year 1972 and is situated within the municipal limits of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 1993 (HC)

Mukhtiar Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-13-1993

Reported in : (1994)107PLR105

..... johian being above 25 years of age and incurring no disqualification under section 6, sub-section (5) of section 102 (2) of the punjab gram panchayat act, 1952 or the rules. they were eligible for contesting election of sarpanch or panch. petitioners belong to rai sikh community and were eligible to ..... efficacious. it bears repetition that there is no constitutional bar to the maintainability of such a writ petition with respect to local bodies such as municipal committees, district board or gram panchayats in the manner indicated by the constitution under articles 329b with respect to elections held to the state assemblies ..... the case have not been denied and the cause of petitioners has been opposed on the solitary ground that under section 13 (b) of the punjab gram panchayat act, 1952, remedy of election petition is available and writ should, therefore, be dismissed leaving it on the petitioner to avail alternative remedy under ..... is only the plea of alternative remedy which is pressed into service. a division bench of this court in nachhatar singh and anr. v. state of punjab and ors. (1993-2)104 p.l.r. 147 (d.b), has held, 'it is clear that while the remedy for the purpose of ..... further in the column under the caption 'i hereby promise taking oath under section 9 sub-section (1) of the act, i will resign from the membership of parliament or punjab legislative assembly, signatures of the candidate have been appended. again in another column under the caption 'i am stating hereby that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 1993 (HC)

Balbir Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-11-1993

Reported in : AIR1994P& H105

..... gram panchayat was held in the month of january, 1993. the publication for the election, as required under the punjab gram panchayat act (hereinafter to be referred as the act, and the punjab gram panchayat election rules. 1960 (hereinafter to be referred as the rules) was made. nominations were invited and filed ..... the election. attention of the court has been invited to rule 14-a which was inserted in the rules through the rules known as punjab gram panchayat election (first amendment) rules, 1993 vide notification issued on that behalf on january 6,1993, the said rule reads as ..... which mandates that the candidate who had secured highest number of votes shall be deemed to have been elected.12. the learned advocate general punjab appearing for respondents nos. 1 to 3 and mr. gandhi advocate for respondent no. 4, however, have joined serious issue with the ..... orders of deputy commissioner jalandhar who is the incharge of district panchayat election. there being orders by the deputy commissioner, the presiding officer acted in accordance with the same.6. respondent no. 4 in his written statement besides raising some preliminary objections like maintainability of joint petition ..... he had openly supported shri bipan kumar, who was the present municipal counsellor and in the vidhan sabha elections, he had supported shri gulzara ram from jalandhar cantt. constituency from where ultimately the present chief minister of punjab has won. he has vehemently denied the averments of the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 20 1993 (HC)

Hissar Improvement Trust, Through Its Chairman Vs. the President, Trib ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-20-1993

Reported in : (1994)106PLR226

..... is as to whether the improvement trust has the locus standi to file a writ petition challenging the award of the tribunal given under the punjab improvement trusts act, and further as to whether the improvement trust is competent to file a letters patent appeal. the decision of this question depends upon the ..... -1) 106 p.l.r. (sic). the hon'ble supreme court in this case has considered the three earlier judgments of the hon'ble supreme court in municipal corporation of the city of ahmedabad v. chandulal shamaldas patel 1971(3) s.c.c. 8211 himalaya tiles and marbles (p) ltd. v. francis victor coutinho ..... court in indo swiss time ltd., dundahera v. umrao and ors., (1981) 83 plr 335 (f.b.) and kulbhushan kumar & co. v. state of punjab, (1983) 85 plr 768 (f.b.).6. the only question which has been referred to this full bench of five judges is as to whether the cases ..... various case law on the subject, the hon'ble supreme court has found that the definition of 'person interested' in section 18 of the land acquisition act, 1894 must be liberally construed so as to include a body, local authority, or a company for whose benefit the land is acquired and who is ..... interpretation of the words 'person interested', used in section 18(1) of the land acquisition act, 1894 which reads as follows:-'18. reference to court.--(1) any person interested who has, not accepted the award may, by written application to the collector .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 1993 (HC)

Lt. Col Raghbir Singh (Retd.) and ors. Vs. Kulbir Singh Brar and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-07-1993

Reported in : (1993)104PLR356

..... the share of the respondents. respondents, on 30.4.1981, made an application under section 42 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as the act) to the additional director, consolidation of holdings, punjab. this was followed by second application dated 8.9.1981 in these applications, a grievance was made by the ..... moved an application for restoration of the possession. the additional director, consolidation, after hearing both the parties, condoned the delay in filing application under section 42 of the act and necessary relief as prayed for was given. the respondents were given 25 karams from kotkapura on the northern side and the petitioners were given 67 karams on the ..... notice of the application was given to the petitioners who contested the same on various grounds including the ground of limitation. in the application under section 42 of the act, respondents had also given an explanation for making the same belatedly. the explanation given was that gurbachan singh, predecessor in interest of the present respondent was in the ..... respondents that major portion of the area was within the municipal limits and, the before, was reserved area and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 28 1993 (HC)

Prem Chand Vs. Commissioner, Patiala Division and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-28-1993

Reported in : (1993)104PLR37

..... panchayat samiti till the year 1977 78.2. on march 17, 1978, respondent no. 3 filed an application under section 5 of the punjab public premises and land (eviction and rent recovery) act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the act) for the eviction of the petitioner on the ground that he was in unauthorised occupation of the plot belonging to the applicant. the ..... petitioner was ordered to be evicted as per order dated march 18, 1981 passed by the collector, ropar exercising the powers under the act with a direction to respondent no. 3 to pay compensation to the petition refer the construction raised on the vacant plot. the appeal filed by the petitioner before the commissioner ..... n.k. sodhi, j.1. a vacant plot measuring 37 x 14' situate in the municipal limits of morinda, district ropar was taken on lease by shri jati ram, father of the petitioner, in an auction from the then district board, ambala for a period of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //