Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Year: 2002 Page 6 of about 318 results (0.092 seconds)

Sep 19 2002 (HC)

Uttam Parkash Bansal and ors. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-19-2002

Reported in : 100(2002)DLT497

..... be initiated. reliance, in this connection, has been placed upon decisions in jiwan dass v. life insurance corporation of india and anr., reported in ; jain ink . and anr. v. punjab national bank and others, : [1990]3scr649 , and dr. k.r.k. talwar v. union of india and anr., : air1977delhi189 .13. it is not in dispute that sh. uttam parkash bansal ..... territory of delhi or in any other union territory. (viii) any cantonment board constituted under the cantonments act, 1924 (2 of 1924), and (3) in relation to the (national capital territory of delhi)- (i) any premises belonging to the municipal corporation of delhi, or any municipal committee or notified area committee, (ii) any premises belonging to the delhi development authority, whether such premises ..... and ors. v. the military estate officer and anr. : [1973]1scr515 as also in ashoka marketing ltd. and anr. v. punjab national bank and ors. : [1990]3scr649 , it was held that the scope of the provisions of the said act cannot be cut down on the basis of the apprehension that the corporations like the nationalised banks or lic, which are ..... the central government. (iii) any university established or incorporated by any central act. (iv) any institute incorporated by the institutes of technology act, 1961. (v) any board of trustees constituted under the major port trusts act, 1963. (vi) the bhakra management board constituted under section 79 of the punjab reorganisation act, 1966 and that board as and when re-named as the bhakra-beas .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 2002 (HC)

Dilip Singh Parocha and ors. Vs. Mahalaxmi Co-op. Housing Society Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-16-2002

Reported in : 2002(6)BomCR581; (2002)1BOMLR732; [2003(96)FLR1114]; 2002(4)MhLj554

..... adjudication of the status and nature of the employment of the claimants who moved an application under section 33-c(2) for computation of wages. following the judgment of the municipal corporation of delhi (supra), the supreme court dismissed the special leave petition filed by the workmen.7. shri patel has rightly relied upon the judgment of the division bench of ..... have further decided it as an incidental question whether the respondent society was an industry or was not an industry. the judgment of the supreme court in the case of municipal corporation of delhi (supra), the facts were totally different, the applicants in that case claimed equal wages for equal work on the basis that the claimants were also doing the ..... of the person invoking its jurisdiction. para 7 of the said judgment sets out the scope and parameters of section 33-c(2) of the i.d. act, which is reproduced hereinbelow :--'7. the punjab and the delhi high courts in the decisions relied upon by the petitioner have taken a view that the labour court cannot be go into the question ..... , according to shri singh, cannot fall within the jurisdictional parameters of the executing court under section 33-c(2) of the i.d. act. shri singh has relied upon the following judgments in support of his contentions.i) municipal corporation of delhi v. ganesh razak and anr. 1995 1 clr 171 ii) tarn and ors. and director, social welfare and ors. 1998 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2002 (HC)

Shivala Damodar Dass Vs. Ramji Dass and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-09-2002

Reported in : (2003)133PLR225

hemant gupta, j. 1. this is landlord's petition challenging the order passed by the appellate authority under the east punjab rent restriction act (hereinafter referred as the act) dismissing his petition for ejectment interalia on the ground that respondent no. 1 has sub-let the premises in favour of respondents no. 2 and 3 and that respondent no. ..... rs. 300/- per month after 1.7.1986. however, whenever the answering respondent approached the applicant he was informed that the site plan has not been got sanctioned from the municipal council and other tenants have not agreed to the terms and conditions so that respondent was told to wait till the site plan is sanctioned and other tenants are persuaded .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 28 2002 (HC)

Krishna Oberoi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-28-2002

Reported in : 2002(5)ALD318; [2002]257ITR105(AP)

..... cobb v. lane (supra), marachant v. charters, (1977) 3 all er 918 r.n.kapur's case (supra ), b.m.lall v. dunlop rubber co. : [1968]1scr23 , qudrat ullah v. municipal board, bareilly : [1974]2scr530 , board of revenue v. a.m.ansari : [1976]3scr661 , dipak baneriee v. smt lilabati chakroborty : [1987]3scr680 , khalil ahmed bashir ahmed v. tufelhussein samasbhai saranpurwala, : [1988 ..... the decision-making in the present case and it would not help in considering the definition of 'rent' as defined under the explanation to section 194-i. in state of punjab v. british india corpn (supra), the supreme court dealing with the question whether the payment received from the employees of the british india corporation, on leave and license, the ..... . in support of the above contention, sri kodandaram placed reliance on the judgments of the apex court in associated hotels of india v. r.n.kapoor : [1960]1scr368 , state of punjab v. british india corpn. : [1964]2scr114 , ramamurthy subudhi v. gopinath : [1967]2scr559 , rajbir kaur v.chokosiri and co. : air1988sc1845 , commissioner of income tax v. darjeeling club ltd. : [1985]153itr676( ..... respondent therein is liable to be taxed under the punjab urban immovable property tax act, 1940 as 'rent' within the meaning of the rule 18(4)(ii) of the punjab urban immovable property tax rules, 1941 held that the payment received from those employees not being rent within the meaning of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 23 2002 (HC)

Sh. Ganpat Rai Vs. Sh. Parsotam Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-23-2002

Reported in : (2003)133PLR361

..... petitioner against the order of the rent controller, pathankot dated 17.12.1981.2. the petitioner landlord had filed an application under section 13 of the east punjab urban rent restriction act, 1949 (for short 'the act') for eviction of the respondent-tenant from a part of his house on the ground floor on the ground of personal necessity. the house is situated ..... within the municipal limits of pathankot. one portion of this house comprising of three rooms, one bath room and one kitchen had been kept by him for himself for ..... separately but with the family, he would certainly require extra accommodation. in this view of the matter, i am satisfied that the petitioner's application under section 13 of the act deserves to be allowed.7. accordingly, the order of the rent controller dated 17.12.1981 and that of theappellate authority dated 8.10.1982 are hereby set aside. the ..... petitioner's applicationunder section 13 of the act is allowed. the respondent is granted three months time tovacate the demised premises. since no one has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent, there shall be no order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 31 2002 (HC)

Amolak Singh and ors. Vs. the Pathankot Improvement Trust, Through Its ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-31-2002

Reported in : (2003)133PLR658

..... 24/28 of the punjab town improvement act, 1921, referred in short as the act. the land in dispute is situated within the municipal limits of pathankot. these lands were covered under the notification obviously with the object of developing the area in accordance with the ..... cattle sheds in the revenue estate of village saili. the pathankot improvement trust, pathankot, hereinafter referred to as the trust, issued a notification under section 36 of the punjab town improvement act, 1922 upon holding a special meeting on 3,4.1971 for expansion of development scheme known as 'timber market and truck stand etc.'. this scheme was framed under section ..... in reply to paragraph no. 5 of this application, the respondent-trust has stated that the lay-out plan sanction had been amended under section 43 of the punjab town improvement. trust act and under the amended lay-out plan, number of buildings have been accommodated while for the remaining construction, which was unauthorised, trust is taking action. till the hearing ..... following order:-'in these cases the notification under section 36 of the punjab town improvement act, 1922 (which corresponds to section 4 of the land acquisition act) was published on 11.6.1971 and the notification under section 41 of the act (which corresponds to section 6 of the land acquisition act) was published on 31.10.1973. the land acquisition officer passed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 2002 (HC)

Roshan Lal Vs. Ved Prakash

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-10-2002

Reported in : (2003)134PLR97

..... , bathinda, which was confirmed in appeal by appellate authority, bathinda vide order dated 13.5.2002.facts :2. ved parkash filed ejectment application under section 13 of the east punjab urban rent restriction act, 1949 for the ejectment of roshan lal from shop no.90, situated at gandhi market, bathinda as shown in the site plan (ex.a-9) attached to the ..... house tax. he is liable to pay him house tax since 1991-92 which he has paid to the municipal committee. he has not vacated any such premises within urban area of bathinda without sufficient cause after the commencement of the aforesaid act. he has also not disclosed of any such building. he has no other shop to look to for running ..... . 304, it was held that tenant can not challenge the relationship of landlord and tenant and family partition between the co-owners of the premises in summary proceedings under the act for ejectment initiated for ejectment by the landlord. family partition pleaded by the landlord has to be taken to be correct.10. in this case both the courts below have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2002 (HC)

Achhe Lal Ram Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : Mar-06-2002

Reported in : 2002(50)BLJR1030

..... that they had no hesitation in holding that the observation of the learned single judge in relation to the interpretation of section 74 of the act was correct and that the state of bihar can only 'pass on' any information or relevant materials to the state of jharkhand lor any ..... to either initiate disciplinary proceedings or issue suspension order against such person would be in violation of the express mandate contained in section 74 of the act and the proviso thereto. on and from the appointed day, the 'existing state of bihar' as defined in section 2(e) ceased to exist ..... 406] :'whatever may be the view point, whatever may be differing perceptions or opinions, the fact remains that it is section 74 of the act which has an overriding effect because section 74 is the only legal provision which can be given meaningful interpretation, compatible with the clear legislative intent because ..... 115 of the aforesaid 1956 act because 1956 act in section 115 clearly stipulates and ..... mention that sections 72 and 74 of the act are in pari materia to section 82 and 83 of the punjab reorganisation act. 1966. section 74 is also in pari materia to section 116 of the states re-organisation act, 1956, but section 72 of the act is materially and substantially different to section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 2002 (HC)

Pishora Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-01-2002

Reported in : 2002CriLJ4130

..... forth on record the benefit of anticipatory bail had been extended to the accused after noticing the scope of the applicability of section 18 of the act.17. thus, keeping in view the position of law and totality of circumstances on record noticed in the earlier part of this order, i ..... of the act would not apply.13. in fairness to the counsel for the petitioner, reference was also made to the case dr. varinder mohan v. state of punjab (1999) 3 all cri lr 449, wherein allegations against the petitioner-accused in that case were that he had called veena rani, municipal councillor of ..... would not be attracted eventually has to be decided after the conclusion of the trial. under these circumstances, the anticipatory bail was allowed to the petitioner.14. in pala singh v. state of punjab (2000) 1 rec cri r 817, the facts ..... rajpura as 'chuhra' besides imputing other allegations after the initial utterances were made by jaswant kaur. on the basis of these facts the hon'ble judge came to the conclusion that serious debatable issues were likely to arise during the trial of the case and whether the bar of section 18 of the act ..... were that there was dispute over the possession of land. the harijan party and the opponent party were fighting litigation in court. fir no. 60 dated 31-10-1999 was registered under sections 447, 379, 427, 148 and 149, i.p.c. and under section 3 of the act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2002 (SC)

Delhi Administration (Now N.C.T. of Delhi) Vs. Manohar Lal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-29-2002

Reported in : AIR2002SC3088; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)560; 2002CriLJ4295; 2002(4)Crimes122(SC); 99(2002)DLT480(SC); 2002(65)DRJ158; JT2002(6)SC325; 2003(1)KLT653(SC); 2002(6)SCALE147; (2002)7SCC22

..... high court, and following the earlier decisions of this court reported in n. sukumaran nair v. food inspector, mavelikara : 1995crilj3651 and santosh kumar v. municipal corporation and anr. : 2000crilj2777 , more so when the counsel appearing for the state in the high court conceded to the fact that the case on hand ..... may, without the consent of the person sentenced, commute, among other things enumerated therein, a sentence of simple imprisonment for fine. this court in state of punjab v. kesar singh (supra), though while considering clause (b) of the very provision has observed as follows : 'the mandate of section 433. cr.p. ..... jurisdictional or other error of any kind was also found in the sentence imposed. placing reliance upon a decision of this court reported in state of punjab v. kesar singh : 1996crilj3586 , it has been urged that the power under section 433 cr.p.c. has to be exercised by the state ..... new delhi and all over other places in the country are said to be causing severe impediment in the effective enforcement of the provisions of the act to curb the social evil, having further wide ramifications on the society. shri ranjit kumar, learned senior counsel, appearing for the respondent with equal ..... offence under section 16 read with section 7 for the violation of section 2(ia)(a), (j) of the prevention of good adulteration act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') by the metropolitan magistrate, new delhi, on 9.5.2000 in case no. 42 of 1994. thereupon, on 12.5.2000 .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //