Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Year: 2013 Page 2 of about 800 results (0.106 seconds)

Jul 11 2013 (HC)

In the High Court for the States of Punjab Vs. State of Punjab and ors ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-11-2013

..... the town planning scheme no.9-a [annexure p-7].sanctioned by the government of punjab, department of local bodies on 04.08.1988 in purported exercise of their powers under section 192[3].of the punjab municipal act, 1911. the town planning scheme has been sanctioned in respect of an un-built area . ..... known as area no.9a, measuring 64739 square yards of municipal committee, patiala. the petitioner also impugns the order passed by the administrator of the then municipal committee, patiala on 10. ..... development of the public park. similarly, possession of the property which is subject matter of the accompanying writ petition was also taken by the municipal corporation as no ad-interim protection was granted by this court. he further points out that 95% of the scheme has already been implemented. ..... was not permissible to acquire area of land owners in excess of 25 per cent without payment of compensation .[6].learned counsel for the municipal corporation, patiala urges that since no authorised construction was ever raised by the petitioner and since the piece of land in his possession forms ..... scheme. he thus seeks a direction for the release of his six marlas land out of the purview of the scheme. [4].the then municipal committee, patiala [not a corporation].has filed its reply/affidavit maintaining that the land, said to have been taken by the petitioner on lease .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 22 2013 (HC)

Gram Panchayat Bajwara Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-22-2013

..... today, no order has been passed by any competent authority, under the provisions of the punjab municipal act, 1911, ordering transfer of shamlat deh land, existing in the name of gram panchayat, in the name of municipal council, hoshiarpur. when notice of motion was issued, the following order was passed by this ..... respondent no.2. jasbir singh, judge (oral) part of the land falling within the jurisdiction of petitioner-gram panchayat was amalgamated within the municipal limits of municipal council, hoshiarpur by issuing a notification on 4.9.1979 (annexure p8).in this writ petition, challenge has been laid to a letter/ ..... both the parties can get interim order/clarification from the court where civil litigation is pending. it is further stated before us that municipal corporation is also going to be created by amalgamating the gram sabha area of gram panchayat and other areas. if it happens in future ..... court on 4.10.2008:- learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on a decision rendered by a division bench of this court in mrs.renuka sekhon versus state of punjab, ..... 1999(2) plr 58.and a judgment rendered by a single bench of this court in nahar singh versus the additional director consolidation of holdings, 1993(1) recent revenue reports, 19, so as to assert that, if a part of the property of the gram panchayat has been notified as falling within the municipal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 21 2013 (HC)

Gram Panchayat Village Neelpur Through S.Bant Singh Sarpanch and Vs. t ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-21-2013

..... dass ghanshyam 2013.08.27 11:24 i am the author of this document high court chandigarh c.w.p.no.5267 of 1995 -2- punjab municipal act, 1911 as amended, would require the respondents to solicit objections from the persons residing in the affected villages/areas. the grievance of the petitioners is that in the said notifications anneuxres ..... people from the affected area may possibly remain in the dark about the areas of their village being included in the municipal limits. a division bench of this court in ms.vee kay oils pvt.ltd.v.the state of punjab (supra) has observed as follows :- after hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the view that the writ petition ..... .1 is the gram panchayat of village neelpur, rajpura, district patiala. two notifications were issued by the state of punjab appended to the writ petition as anneuxres p-1 and p-2 expressing its inclination to include within the municipal limits of the municipal council, rajpura, the areas specified in the notifications. the notifications having been issued under section 5(2) of the ..... , ahmedgarh, informed the petitioner that his mill not falls within the municipal limits of ahmedgarh which notice has been termed to be wholly illegal and unjust by the petitioner. to a similar effect is the judgment rendered in sewa singh and others v. state of punjab (supra).consequently, the writ petition is accepted and the impugned notifications annexures p-1 and p .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2013 (HC)

In the High Court for the States of Punjab Vs. State of Punjab and ors ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-16-2013

..... , malerkotla on 20.05.1997 vide its resolution no.138 dated 09.05.1997. the said resolution was annulled by the punjab government on 23.01.1998 in exercise of its powers under section 236 of the punjab municipal act, 1911. the appellants challenged that decision of the state government in cwp no.2227 of 1998 which was disposed of on 20.07.1999 by ..... way of an agreed order gupta dinesh 2013.07.31 12:10 i am the author of this document hihg court chandigarh lpa no.172 of 2012. ::-2-:: enabling the municipal council, malerkotla to ..... part whereof is reproduced as under:- keeping in view the aforesaid situation, i, b.r.bajaj, ias, principal secretary, punjab government local government department exercising the powers given to me approve the resolution no.98 dated 26.12.2006 passed by the municipal council, malerkotla .[7].in the light of the above stated resolution, the appellants were reinstated in service but without ..... the labour court-cum- industrial tribunal, patiala vide following dated 07.12.2007:- labour commissioner, punjab, chandigarh vide endorsement no.18171-71 dated 12.7.05 has referred the following industrial dispute to this court for adjudication under section 10[1].[c].of industrial disputes act, 1947. whether the termination of service of workman gurjant singh justified and in order, if not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 19 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Kulbhushan Raheja Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-19-2013

..... case are that the elections of municipal council, ferozepur, comprising of 25 members.was held on 30.06.2008. the list was notified by ..... letter dated 20.07.2012 issued by respondent no.1 holding that the term of municipal council, ferozepur, shall be for 5 years w.e.f.04.05.2010, which is alleged to be in violation of section 13(1) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 (hereinafter referred to as the act .) and article 243u of the constitution of india. in brief, the facts of the ..... continued is less than six months, it shall not be necessary to hold any election under clause (b) for constituting the municipality for such period. (4) the firs.election to a municipality constituted under this act after the commencement of the punjab municipal (amendment) act 11 of 1994, shall be held within a period of six months of its being notified as such. (5) elections to ..... this document chandigarh cwp no.19261 of 2012 [8].****** exists immediately before the commencement of the punjab municipal (amendment) act 11 of 1994, shall be held within a period of six months from the date of such commencement. (6) a municipality constituted upon the dissolution of a municipality before the expiration of its duration shall continue only for the remainder of the period for which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2013 (HC)

Ludhiana District Cooperative Milk Vs. Vs.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-11-2013

..... judgment in m/s niranjan dass's case (supra).was dealing with a situation where the state government has imposed tax without issuing any direction to the municipal committee constituted under the punjab municipal act, 1911 to impose tax. it was in these circumstances, this court has struck down the levy as the state government could not proceed to levy tax without ..... issuing a direction to the municipal committee to impose tax. the relevant extract from the judgment reads as under: - 6. having given our thoughtful consideration to the ..... rates may be doubled. learned counsel for the petitioner vehemently argued that the state government has imposed tax without following the proper procedure prescribed under the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976 (for short the 'act').therefore, the levy is illegal. reliance is placed upon a division bench judgment of this court reported as m/s niranjan dass doomr.rice and ..... 1993 and in exercise of the powers conferred by section 90 of the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976 (punjab act 42 of 1986) and all other powers enabling him in this behalf, the governot of punjab is pleased to direct all the municipal corporations in the state of -2- punjab to charging tariff with immediate effect from industrial/commercial and institutional consumers who have .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 09 2013 (HC)

Delhi High Court Bar Association and anr. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi an ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-09-2013

..... , 1957 and the other being the punjab municipal act, 1911 both applicable in delhi, constituted union taxation or not. the issue of the legislative competence of the delhi legislature to legislate by virtue of ..... punjab & others. this case was concerned with the issue as to whether the properties of the states situated in the union territory of delhi stood exempted from property taxation levied under the municipal enactment which was in force in the union territory of delhi. the question was as to whether the property taxation under two municipal acts, one being the delhi municipal corporation act ..... of punjab (supra), the question which arose for consideration was whether the properties of the states situated in the union territory of delhi were exempt from property taxes levied under the municipal enactments in force in the union territory of delhi. it is in this backdrop that the question of whether the property taxes under the two municipal acts extant ..... constitutional provisions fell for consideration before the constitution bench of nine judges of the supreme court. in its judgment reported at : (1997) 7 scc339new delhi municipal council v. state of punjab and ors., the court held that the parliament would be in a position of superiority in hierarchy qua the delhi legislative assembly. in this regard, in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 13 2013 (HC)

Sat Pal and Others Vs. the Municipal Corporation Jalandhar and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-13-2013

..... appellants that there is no evidence to prove the necessary ingredients of the definition of "public street" as defined under section 3(13) of the punjab municipal act, 1911, is erroneous as admittedly the previous owner had not objected to the laying of bricklining of the street rs.no.1255 o 15. and other ..... courts below that the site in dispute is a public street is ultra vires of clause 13 sub-clause (a) of section 3 of punjab municipal act and more so when the defendants have not produced the old field book and vide judgment dated 16.12.1940 the predecessor-in-interest of the ..... deciding the issue whether encroached place is a street under section 2(56) of the punjab municipal corporation rs.no.1255 o 5. act, 1976 (in short the act, 1976 .) and a public street under section 2 (43) of the act, 1976 and thus, the impugned judgments and decree are perverse?. firs.of all, i ..... agreement that the street should not thereby become, a public street. it has admittedly been levelled paved, metalled, channelled, sewered, and repaired out of municipal funds. it therefore comes within the purview of the aforesaid definition of a public street. this being so, the plaintiff cannot prevent the defendants from ..... rs.no.1255 o 1. in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh rs.no.1255 of 1986 reserved on:12.07.2013. date of decision:13.08.2013. sat pal and others ...appellants versus the municipal corporation, jalandhar and others ...respondents coram: hon'ble mr.justice paramjeet singh 1 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Binderjit Singh Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-25-2013

..... petitioner's prayer in the writ petition is that in spite of the decision of the government issued under section 232 of the punjab municipal act, 1911 finding the appointment made by the 2nd respondent-municipal committee to one person named kaur chand in place of the petitioner who was validly appointed employe of the ..... only seen whether the ultimate decision that was taken accords with justice. in this case, the order impugned is the decision taken by the municipal committee after a direction from this court in the second round of litigation in the contempt petition. the impugned order reads that a notice had ..... adjudicate on a disputed question of fact. this direction itself was at the second round of litigation and in the firs.round of litigation, the municipal committee had actually admitted to the liability and offered to make the payment. learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would, therefore, argue that when ..... this document chandigarh c.w.p.no.6353 of 1991 -2- service but the contempt petition was closed on a defence taken by the municipal committee that the petitioner had been gainfully employed during the period and therefore, it was not possible for the court exercising contempt jurisdiction to ..... balance between a situation where the employer has not really obtained the benefit of the services but still make him liable for his wrongful act in denying to the employee a right of employment and the benefit of the salary. i have not benefit of information of the scales .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 2013 (HC)

***** Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-29-2013

..... in cwp no.19261 of 2012 titled as buta singh and others versus state of punjab and others . which was decided on 19.7.2013 referring to the provisions of the constitution of india and punjab municipal act, 1911 [for short the act ].and it was held that the tenure of the municipal council shall be for a period of five years from the date of firs ..... .meeting . it was further held that in the explanation to section 13(1) of the act, the word used by the legislature is held and ..... .meeting . the petitioners are aggrieved against the letter dated 19.7.2013 by which they are informed that local government punjab (municipal election cell) vide its notification dated 16.7.2013 has fixed the expiry date of the term of the house of municipal council, batala as 27.7.2013 and sub divisional magistrate, batala has been appointed as administrator. learned counsel for ..... date of decision:26. 07.2013 ***** jatinder kalyan and others . .petitioners versus state of punjab and others . . respondents ***** coram: hon ble mr.justice rakesh kumar jain ***** present: mr.sukhbir singh, advocate, for the petitioners.***** rakesh kumar jain, j. (oral) the petitioners were elected as municipal councilors of municipal council, batala in the election held on 30.6.2008. a meeting was convened on .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //