Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Year: 2013 Page 8 of about 800 results (0.089 seconds)

Sep 10 2013 (HC)

Cwp No.15715 of 2013 (Oandm) Vs. Chandigarh Administration

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-10-2013

..... in law nor in fact. in case, there is any loss of revenue on account of withdrawal of a bid, section 60 of the punjab excise act, 1914, empowers the government to recover the difference from the bidder who has withdrawn his bid. the respondents have instead of putting the liquor ..... .of an year, counsel for the petitioner relies upon judgments of the hon ble supreme court in monarch infrastructure (p) ltd.v/s commissioner, ulhasnagar municipal corporation and others ., (2000) 5 scc287 ashok lanka and another v/s rishi dixit and others ., (2005) 5 scc598 shri cooverjee b. bharucha ..... virtually made the liquor license rules unworkable. keeping this in view and seeing the trend, the respondents have carried out the amendment in the punjab liquor license rules, 1956 through amendment rules notified vide notification dated 16.07.2013 by substituting clause (xiv) of rule 27(4)(a).the ..... cwp no.15715 of 2013 -11- 1 .the prospective bidders have compelled the respondents to carry out the present amendment so as to make the punjab liquor license rules, 1956 for the union territory chandigarh commencing from the firs.day of may, 2013, workable. the modus operandi adopted by the prospective ..... verma, advocate, for u.t.,chandigarh/respondents. ******* rajive bhalla, j. the petitioner challenges the validity of clause (xiv) rule 27(4)(a) of the punjab liquor licence rules, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the rules ) amended vide notification dated 16.07.2013 (annexure p-4) and also prays for issuance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 2013 (HC)

Vijay Vs. Sunil Kumari and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-01-2013

..... .mann, j.(oral) the petitioner, who is the returned candidate and whose election is under challenge in a petition instituted by respondent no.1 under section 272 of the haryana municipal act, 1973, has filed the present revision under article 227 of the constitution of india for challenging the order passed by the civil judge (senior division).jind on 1.12.2012 ..... in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh cr 137.of 2013 date of decision : march 01, 2013 vijay ....petitioner versus sunil kumari and others .....respondents coram : hon'ble mr.justice t.p.s. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 2013 (HC)

N. Malla Reddy Vs. State of A.P. Rep., by Its Secretary, Re

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-30-2013

..... mademsetty satyanarayana v.g.yelloji rao22, associated hotels of india ltd.v.s.b.sardar ranjit singh23, jaswantsingh mathurasingh v. ahmedabad municipal corpn.24, sikkim subba associates v. state of sikkim25; krishna bahadur v. purna theatre26; state of punjab v. davinder pal singh bhullar27).in order to constitute waiver, there must be voluntary and intentional relinquishment of a right. ..... 03.06.2013, are being set aside, suffice it to leave it open to the petitioner to avail his legal remedies against the authorities and officials concerned for their alleged acts of interfering with the cours.of administration of justice. the writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand disposed of. ..... the cancellation or suspension of the licences are liable for compounding, but not the offences against whom the criminal cases are registered under section 36 (c) of the act. therefore, for this reason also, the licence of the fourth respondent cannot be restored.............". (emphasis supplied).observations made in judgments must not be read out of context ..... statute. (gurudevdatta vksss maryadit v. state of maharashtra13, manohar lal v. vinesh anand14).when the legislative intent is found specific mention and expression in the provisions of the act itself, the same cannot be whittled down or curtailed and rendered nugatory. (bharathidasan university v. all india council for technical education15).effect should be given to all the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 2013 (HC)

Messer Griesheim Gmbh Vs. Goyal Mg Gases Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-29-2013

..... to hold a contrary view. he submitted that the said judgment was per incuriam in terms of the law explained in a series of judgments including municipal corporation of delhi v. gurnam kaur (1989) 1 scc101 he also distinguished the decision in dallah albaraka investment co. ltd, london v. ajitabh bachchan ..... and mr. p.s.bindra, appearing for the jd, submitted that when section 5 (2) of the delhi high court act, 1966 ( dhca ) is read with section 24 of the punjab courts act, 1918 ( pca ) it is evident that the high court is a principal civil court only for suits of pecuniary value ..... other jurisdiction as, under the law in force immediately before the appointed day, is exercisable in respect of the territories by the high court of punjab. (2) notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, the high court of delhi shall also have in respect of ..... the above submissions with detailed reasons. there was no presumption of the genuineness of the balance sheet. sections 397 and 398 of the companies act provided a remedy to a majority shareholder to question the mismanagement of the affairs of a company, which included the right to question minutes and ..... the execution petition is a certified copy of the aforementioned judgment and decree together with a certificate under section 10 of the foreign judgments (reciprocal enforcement) act, 1973 ( fjrea ) certifying that the said judgment and decree has not been satisfied in full or in part by means of execution or otherwise .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 16 2013 (HC)

Municipal Council Sangrur Vs. Karnail Singh and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-16-2013

..... well as legal aspect of the matter that the issue involved herein is squarely covered by the judgment rendered by the hon'ble supreme court in municipal employees union (regd.) sirhind and others vs. state of punjab and others, (2000) 9 scc 43.and nagar council kapurthala vs. davinder kumar and others, (2012) 10 scc 28.as well as the division bench ..... after deep examination of the matter. to so say, the simple but strong reason is that the impugned order was passed way back on 16.8.2012 and the petitioner- municipal council had enough time to comply with this order so as to avoid the payment of interest, which was ordered to start after expiry of six months. neither the petitioner ..... industrial tribunal, patiala, the petitioner municipal council has approached this court by way of these 20 writ petitions under article 226/227 of the constitution of india, seeking a writ in the ..... .14915 of 2013 municipal council, sangrur .....petitioner. vs. harbans singh and another .....respondents. coram : hon'ble mr. justice rameshwar singh malik present : mr. g.s. attariwala, advocate for the petitioner. **** rameshwar singh malik j.(oral) feeling aggrieved against the impugned order dated 16.8.2012 (annexure p-6) passed under section 33 (c) (2) of the industrial disputes act, 1947, by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 12 2013 (HC)

Fatehgarh Sahib. We Take Judicial Notice of the Fact That Vs. Ikbal Si ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-12-2013

..... municipal limits or constitution of a gram panchayat would not per se come within the ambit of a writ court though the statutory procedure required to ..... remain in abeyance. in case the authorities find that there is any conflict between the directions issued herein-above or those passed in earlier cases pertaining to village bir amloh/municipal council, amloh, this order shall amount to modification of the previous orders.the state government is directed to take an appropriate decision within a period of one month from the ..... referred to the reporters or not?. 3. whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?. --- surya kant, j. (oral) notice of motion. ms.munisha gandhi, learned additional advocate general, punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. let five copies of the writ petition be supplied to the learned state counsel during the cours.of day failing which the order ..... the petitioners want the inclusion of village bir amloh hadbast no.27 within municipal area of municipal council, amloh while the others including some religious persons who had approached the court earlier, want a separate gram panchayat for village bir amloh to be constituted in terms of section 3 of the punjab panchayati raj act, 1994. the inclusion or exclusion of an area within .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 20 2013 (HC)

Kurukshetra University Kurukshetra Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-20-2013

..... it is undisputed on record that petitioner was the creation of a statute. its object was to provide education. no civic amenities or facilities were being provided by the respondent-municipal council. all the basic amenities including public health, sanitation, streets, roads, parks etc.were being provided and maintained by the petitioner- university itself. the entire income was ..... (annexure p-2) would stand defeated. factual aspect of the matter has not been denied by the respondents in their written statements. no basic amenities were being provided by the municipal council. all the facilities like public health, sanitation, streets, roads, street lights, sewerage, water supply, parks and public conveniences were being provided and maintained by the petitioner-university ..... , sanitation, parks and other civil amenities were constructed and being maintained by the petitioner- university from its own financial resources, without seeking any kind of assistance from the respondent-municipal council. a well thought decision was taken by the respondent-state issuing the notification dated 17.1.1983 (annexure p-2) and vide clause (iv) thereof, exemption was ..... facts of the case, which are hardly in dispute, are that the petitioner is the creation of a statute known as `kurukshetra university act, 1956' (act not xii of 1956).issued by the state of punjab (joint punjab as it then was).the campus of the university is spread over a vast area of about 400 acres, including residential as well .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 2013 (HC)

Whether Reporters of Local Papers May Be Allowed to See the Vs. Munici ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-22-2013

..... parties. since procedural violation of the punjab panchayati raj act, 1994 is being alleged by the petitioners.we are of the view that even if the ..... the nature of order which we propose to pass, there is no necessity to seek counter reply from the respondents at this stage. the petitioner-municipal council, amloh through its executive officer seeks quashing of the notification dated 26.11.2012 (annexure p-3) issued by the government of cwp no ..... the judgment should be reported in the digest?. --- surya kant, j. (oral) notice of motion. mr.n.k.verma, senior deputy advocate general, punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. let five copies of the writ petition be supplied to the learned state counsel during the cours.of day failing ..... .6317 of 2013 [2].punjab whereby a new gram panchayat of village bir amloh has been formed incorporating certain areas of ward nos.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 & 11 of the municipal council, amloh, district fatehgarh sahib. we have heard learned counsel for the ..... date of decision : march 22, 2013 municipal council, amloh .....petitioner versus state of punjab and others .....respondents coram : hon'ble mr.justice surya kant. hon'ble mr.justice rameshwar singh malik. present : mr.k.s.dadwal, advocate, for the petitioner. mr.n.k.verma, senior dag, punjab. -.- 1. whether reporters of local .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2013 (HC)

In View of the Authoritative Judicial Pronouncements of This Vs. Munic ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-23-2013

..... that healthy bidding has taken place. the rates approved in the detailed project report were exorbitant and that the consultant of the project has throughout acted mala-fidely. even the deputy controller (finance & accounts), municipal corporation, amritsar, has stated that his signatures on the technical evaluation report were obtained by distorting the facts. reference was made to the exorbitant ..... the direction of the punjab state human rights commission dated 24.9.2003, a status report was filed by the municipal corporation that the land fill at site at bhagtanwala measuring 194 kanals, is not being used and an application for authorization ..... 8504 of 2003 sat priya mehamia memorial education trust (regd.) v. state of haryana and others, it is not necessary to take environmental impact assessment clearance from the punjab pollution control board. the petitioner again sought possession of the land asserting that the petitioner does not require clearance from the pollution control board in respect of the existing dumping ..... pollution to the locality. a processing unit of the dead animals also existed at that place, which also added to the pollution. the petitioner submitted a complaint to the punjab state human rights commission, but during the pendency of the complaint, the rules were notified and the respondents assured the implementation of the said rules. in pursuance of .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2013 (HC)

***** Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-06-2013

..... that abovesaid villages/areas do not fall within the municipal corporation limits and as such there is no question of giving any sewerage connection as alleged by the petitioner. it is further stated that the sewerage line is not yet ..... sewerage pipeline. it is only stated that respondent no.3 is only an execution agency and whatever project is given, after execution thereof the same becomes property of the concerned municipal corporation and the said corporation regulates the same. in reply filed by respondent no.2 and 4, the allegations leveled by the petitioner are denied. it is specifically stated therein ..... supply sewerage board. it is further prayed that let the sewerage connection be given to the inhabitants of the aforesaid villages/areas through the sewer laid down by municipal corporation ludhiana. it is stated that respondent no.4 is misusing its powers and giving direct sewerage connections from the cwp no.1022 of 2013 -2- main sewer pipeline to ..... haryana at chandigarh ***** cwp no.1022 of 2013 date of decision:06. 05.2013 ***** dial singh . .petitioner versus state of punjab and others . . respondents ***** coram: hon ble mr.justice jasbir singh, acting chief justice hon ble mr.justice rakesh kumar jain ***** present: mrs.kamla malik, advocate, for mr.onkar singh batalvi, advocate, for the petitioner. mr.j.s.puri, addl. a.g .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //