Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Year: 2013 Page 9 of about 800 results (0.090 seconds)

Feb 08 2013 (HC)

Cwp No.23589 of 2011 Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-08-2013

..... and registered the sale deeds. as a normal course, we would have directed parties to file appeals against the mutations, as such, a procedure is envisaged by the punjab land revenue act, 1887 but in view of the peculiar facts and cwp no.23589 of 2011 -12- circumstances of the present case, particularly, the fraudulent transactions noticed hereinabove, ..... set aside. the writ petition is accordingly allowed. the chief secretary to government of haryana, is directed to hold a detailed inquiry and take appropriate steps to retrieve panchayat/municipal committee property. the chief secretary, haryana, shall also ensure that proceedings i.e.civil, criminal as well as departmental, are initiated against all concerned including defaulting government ..... . the case, in hand, demonstrates the ease with which unscrupulous elements, connive with revenue officers.weave a web of fraudulent sale deeds, decrees and revenue entries to deprive municipal committees/gram panchayats of their properties. the brazen manner, in which officers tasked with an obligation to protect public property, cwp no.23589 of 2011 -5- collude and ..... of private respondents are legal and valid. the respondents are bonafide purchasers for valuable consideration. it is further submitted that building plans were submitted by private respondents to the municipal committee, hathin after depositing requisite charges, vide receipts dated 13.10.2010 and 23.11.2011, thereby clearly proving that the land, in dispute, does not belong .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 04 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Aayush Gupta Advocate Vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh T ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-04-2013

..... not compliance of any of the terms and conditions of the allotment or for furnishing any wrong or incorrect information, the additional commissioner, municipal corporation, chandigarh exercising the powers of the estate officer under capital of punjab (development & regulation) act, 1952 shall resume the site and forfeit the whole or part of the premium and other dues paid/payable by the allottee. the ..... 2003 and more than 6 years have passed but the petitioner failed to deposit the outstanding dues in time as per terms and conditions of allotment letter. the estate officer, municipal corporation, chandigarh has given number of opportunities to the petitioner to clear the outstanding dues but they failed to avail the same. in my opinion, it is not feasible to ..... depositing the balance amount because the existing property rates are much higher. however, once the allottee is defaulted in payment and deposit several opportunities have been given by the secretary, municipal corporation exercise the powers of estate officer for depositing the balance dues if the due payments are not made within the time and just action on the part of secretary ..... exercising the powers of estate officer can only be resumption. in view of above facts, i do not see any reason to interfere with the orders of the secretary municipal corporation exercising the powers of estate officer and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. kant nirmal 2013.09.18 16:04 i am the author of this document high court chandigarh .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 2013 (HC)

ita No. 209 of 2012 Vs. Smt. Neeru Aggarwal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-29-2013

..... and thus not a capital asset. the assessing officer took note of the fact that government of punjab vide notification dated 31.11.2004 extended the municipal limits of municipal council, sujanpur upto malikpur and that the said municipal council has established octroi post at malikpur and the land sold was situated inside octroi post. thus ..... no.209 and 190 of 2012 are answered in favour of the revenue and against the -4- assessee as the land is situated within the municipal limits of municipal council, sujanpur. as a consequence thereof, the order of cit(a) dated 14.7.2011 and learned tribunal dated 10.5.2012 are set ..... versus smt. anjana sehgal decided on 1.3.2011, wherein it has been held that the land situated within the limits of 8 kms from any municipality would be a capital asset, the sale of which would attract capital gain. the court held to the following effect: - 8. a perusal of the ..... aside and that of the assessing officer is restored. in ita no.208 of 2012, the order impugned is order setting aside penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the act ..... not from municipal limits of sujanpur town?. another appeal bearing not ita 19.of 2012 arises against the order of assessment filed by another co-sharer whereas ita no.208 of 2012 is against the order imposing penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the income tax act, 1961 (for short the 'act').the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 08 2013 (HC)

Cocp No.2445 of 2012(Oandm) Vs. Uma Shankar and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-08-2013

..... of encroachments/ unauthorized constructions strictly in accordance with law. the senior superintendent of police, bathinda shall provide police aid, if so required by the municipal corporation to act against the encroachers.however, this order shall not be construed to mean as if the allegations levelled against the private respondents have been accepted by this ..... site in question, as per the revenue record. thereafter, the present writ petition was filed by the residents, whereupon this hon'ble court directed the municipal corporation to ascertain as to whether there is any encroachment and if there is any encroachment, the same may be got removed with the police help. ..... harpal kaur is not the owner of plot in dispute, accordingly her complaint was dismissed. thereafter, 8 feet wide public street was brick paved by the municipal corporation. amarjeet kaur daughter of harpal kaur made some cocp no.2445 of 2012(o&m) 5 encroachment by placing some articles over the site in ..... of shiromani gurudwara prabandhak committee and accordingly they got shri guru granth sahib removed from the spot with full respect. accordingly the staff of the municipal corporation, bathinda consisting of abovementioned officials alongwith other staff and machinery again visited the spot on 19.09.2012 and with police help in the ..... cocp no.2445 of 2012(o&m) 1 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh cocp no.2445 of 2012(o&m) date of decision:08. 03.2013 vijay kumar & ors......petitioner(s) versus .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2013 (HC)

Md.Ammanu Allah Ghouri Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-22-2013

..... writ petitions, is not an exercise of statutory power, but is for violation of the "instructions". section 387-a of the municipalities act confers power on the government to issue instructions to any municipality. even if cancellation of the allotments by the municipal commissioner, is at the behest of the state government, the order of cancellation cannot be said to be an abdication of ..... and an empty formality. (state of u.p. v. om prakash gupta48; s.l. kapoor v. jagmohan49; u.p. junior doctors' action committee v. dr. b. sheetal nandwani50; municipal committee, hoshiarpur44; state of punjab v. jagir singh51; s.g.kotturappa40; p.d.agrawal v. state bank of india52; m.c.mehta v. union of india53; and viveka nand sethi v. chairman, j ..... the facts of the particular case. (chairman, board of mining examination and chief inspector of mines v. ramjee41; union of india v. tulsiram patel42; ecil v. b. karunakar43; municipal committee, hoshiarpur v. punjab state electricity board44). they are not required to be complied with when it would be an empty formality. (state bank of patiala v. s.k. sharma45; s.g. kotturappa40 ..... provision or to render it otiose. (m. pentiah v. muddala veeramallappa2; gammon india ltd. v. union of india3; mysore srtc v. mirja khasim ali beg4; v.tulasamma v. sesha reddy5; punjab beverages (p) ltd. v. suresh chand6; cit v. national taj traders7; calcutta gas co. (proprietary) ltd. v. state of west bengal8, j.k. cotton spg. & wvg. mills co. ltd. v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 2013 (HC)

Municipal Council Sangrur Vs. Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunal

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-22-2013

..... 29.11.2011 passed by the presiding officer, industrial tribunal, patiala in proceedings under section 33 (c) (2) of the industrial disputes act, 1947 (for short the act .) is that the applicant-respondent along with 53 employees of the municipal council, sangrur filed claim applications on 09.11.1992 which were dismissed. aggrieved by the order of the labour court, the workman approached ..... between the parties that if in a given calendar year the punjab state employees had not enjoyed benefit of 52 closed saturdays then the appellants would not be entitled to make any such claim. under these circumstances, the relief which is ..... thrashed out. but this claim of the appellants will be subject to the further rider that at the relevant time the government employees working under the different departments of the punjab state had got the benefit of 52 closed saturdays in a given year as declared by the state government in exercise of its administrative powers.it is not in dispute ..... 1227 of 2013, 1232 of 2013 and 1253 of 2013 -1- in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh 1 cwp no.1228 of 2013 municipal council, sangrur ....petitioner versus presiding officer, industrial tribunal patiala and another ....respondents 2. cwp no.1168 of 2013 municipal council, sangrur ....petitioner versus presiding officer, industrial tribunal patiala and another ....respondents 3. cwp no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 2013 (HC)

Municipal Committee Now Municipal Corporation Rohtak Vs. Siri Ram Mali ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-03-2013

-1- civil revision no.309 of 2013 in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh civil revision no.309 of 2013 date of decision:03. 09.2013 municipal committee not municipal corporation, rohtak ....petitioner versus siri ram malik ....respondent coram: hon'ble mr.justice paramjeet singh 1 whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?. 2) ..... decree dated 23.3.2012 passed by learned civil judge (junior division).rohtak. against that judgment and decree, an appeal along with an application under section 5 of the limitation act was moved for condonation of delay of 45 days in filing singh ravinder 2013.09.06 13:52 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh -2 ..... delay. the delay is not intentional. otherwise also hon'ble supreme court in chandra mani (supra) has held that considerable procedural delay in government department should be condoned, since the municipal committee is an impersonal machinery working through its officers and servants in taking appropriate decisions. in view of the above, present revision petition is allowed, the impugned order is set .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 2013 (HC)

Dharamvir Saini Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-21-2013

..... came into existence on 20.4.2007 declaring daruhera as a municipal committee whereas the communication tower was constructed prior thereto. all these pleas would be relevant matter to be considered but on the basis of evidence. 4. in view of the ..... , haryana. . mahesh grover, j (oral) 1. the petitioner prays for quashing of fir no.94 dated 4.4.2007 under sections 6 & 7 of the punjab scheduled roads and controlled areas restrictions of unregulated development act, 1963, registered at police station, daruhera, district rewari, on the ground that no offence would be made out considering the fact that the communication tower was ..... raise these pleas in proceedings under section 482 cr.p.c., more particularly, when the question of the area falling within the municipal limits would also be a matter of evidence. merely because no objection has been given by the municipal authorities, would not ipso facto lead to such a conclusion for the reason that according to the respondents, the notification also ..... set up in a controlled area which fell within the municipal limits. crl. misc. not m-36592 of 2011 [2].regular permission was taken by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2013 (HC)

Rsa No.4998 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. Municipal Council, Fazilka and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-01-2013

..... the public premises act to get the plaintiffs evicted from the property. both the courts below, thus, non-suited the plaintiffs. no interference ..... interfere in concurrent findings of two courts below. admittedly, plaintiffs were in unauthorized possession of the property and officials of the municipal council were acting in official discharge of duty. the lease period of property had already expired. municipal council was, thus, legally entitled to get possession thereof. for violation of the status quo order passed, a contempt petition ..... was filed. division bench of this court observed that officials of the municipal council had acted in compliance of the order passed by the competent authority under ..... property. earlier the municipal council wanted to dispossess the plaintiffs from the suit land and a civil suit was filed wherein both the parties were directed to maintain status-quo till decision of the said suit. thereafter, defendant council filed an application for eviction of the plaintiffs from the suit land under the punjab public premises act, 1973 much .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2013 (HC)

Rsa No.5001 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. Municipal Council, Fazilka and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-01-2013

..... the public premises act to get the plaintiffs evicted from the property. both the courts below, thus, non-suited the plaintiffs. no interference ..... interfere in concurrent findings of two courts below. admittedly, plaintiffs were in unauthorized possession of the property and officials of the municipal council were acting in official discharge of duty. the lease period of property had already expired. municipal council was, thus, legally entitled to get possession thereof. for violation of the status quo order passed, a contempt petition ..... was filed. division bench of this court observed that officials of the municipal council had acted in compliance of the order passed by the competent authority under ..... property. earlier the municipal council wanted to dispossess the plaintiffs from the suit land and a civil suit was filed wherein both the parties were directed to maintain status-quo till decision of the said suit. thereafter, defendant council filed an application for eviction of the plaintiffs from the suit land under the punjab public premises act, 1973 much .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //