Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: punjab municipal act 1911 Year: 2014 Page 1 of about 700 results (0.202 seconds)

May 06 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. H.P.S. Ghuman Advocate Vs. M/S Mohan MeakIn Limited

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-06-2014

..... decision of division bench of this court in cwp no.1801 of 1995 whereby provisions of sections 3(1)(b) and 3(8aa) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 have been declared ultra vires. the said judgment has been reversed by hon'ble supreme court and the said provisions have been held to be valid ..... of 1995, which has been set aside by the hon'ble supreme court and provisions of sections 3(1)(b) and 3(8aa) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 have been held to be valid?. . admittedly, the lower appellate court has set aside the judgment of court of firs.instance on the basis of ..... said judgment of this court has been reversed by the hon'ble supreme court and the provisions of sections 3(1)(b) and 3(8aa) of punjab municipal act, 1911, which were declared unconstitutional, have been held to be valid. since, the decision of the lower appellate court was based upon the judgment of this ..... and filed written statement. it has been alleged that after the amendment of the punjab municipal act, 1911, the defendants have revised the assessment of the premises of the plaintiff and a valid notice under section 67(3) of the punjab municipal act was served on the plaintiff. the assessment of the house tax has been validly ..... made. the house tax is being recovered as per the provisions of the punjab municipal act. the demand of the house tax is legal. rest of the allegations of the plaint were denied. plaintiff filed replication denying the averments .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 2014 (HC)

Sheel Kumar Goyal Vs. Surender Kumar Sharma

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-26-2014

..... a notification dated 08.12.1954 bearing no.f.4(19)/50-lsg issued by the govt. of delhi in exercise of powers conferred under section 5(3)of the punjab municipal act, 1911 as in force in the state of delhi. the said notification was published in the govt. gazette, delhi state on thursday december, 16, 1954, which reads as under: no.f ..... to the notification dated 08.12.1954 published in the gazette on 16.12.1954 issued under section 5(1) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 (as was in force in the state of delhi at the relevant time) to hold that the municipal committee of delhishahdara included within its extent the entire area of village uldhanpur, and which was referred to not as uldhanpur ..... (19)/50-l.s.g.- in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3) of section 5 of the punjab municipal act, 1911, as in force in the state of delhi, the chief commissioner, delhi, is pleased to include within the limits of municipal committee, delhi-shahdara, the area defined in the schedule below situated coterminously with the northern limits of the existing boundaries ..... .1954 bearing no.f.4(19)/50-lsg issued by the govt. of delhi in exercise of powers conferred under section 5(3) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 as in force in the state of delhi, the remaining land of village uldanpur was included within the limits of municipal committee, delhi-shahdara. hence as on the date of notification of the delhi rent control .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. H.P.S. Ghuman Advocate Vs. M/S Suraj Bhan and Sons

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-06-2014

..... decision of division bench of this court in cwp no.1801 of 1995 whereby provisions of sections 3(1)(b) and 3(8aa) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 have been declared ultra vires. the said judgment has been reversed by hon'ble supreme court and the said provisions have been held to be valid. ..... 1801 of 1995, which has been set aside by the hon'ble supreme court and provisions of sections 3(1)(b) and 3(8aa) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 have been held to be valid?. . admittedly, the lower appellate court has set aside the judgment of court of firs.instance on the basis of ..... said judgment of this court has been reversed by the hon'ble supreme court and the provisions of sections 3(1)(b) and 3(8aa) of punjab municipal act, 1911, which were declared unconstitutional, have been held to be valid. since, the decision of the lower appellate court was based upon the judgment of this court ..... proper procedure under the punjab municipal act. the house tax is being recovered as per the provisions of the punjab municipal act. the demand of the house tax is legal. rest of the allegations of the plaint were denied. plaintiff filed ..... rs.no.2741 of 2002 (o&m) 3 statement. it has been alleged that in response to the notice under sections 65/67 of the punjab municipal act, the plaintiff filed the objections on 29.11.1994 and the assessment order has been passed by the defendant on 03.02.1995 after following the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 06 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. H.P.S. Ghuman Advocate Vs. Raj Kumar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-06-2014

..... decision of division bench of this court in cwp no.1801 of 1995 whereby provisions of sections 3(1)(b) and 3(8aa) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 have been declared ultra virus. the said judgment has been reversed by hon'ble supreme court and the said provisions have been held to be valid. ..... 1801 of 1995, which has been set aside by the hon'ble supreme court and provisions of sections 3(1)(b) and 3(8aa) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 have been held to be valid?. . admittedly, the lower appellate court has set aside the judgment of court of firs.instance on the basis of ..... said judgment of this court has been reversed by the hon'ble supreme court and the provisions of sections 3(1)(b) and 3(8aa) of punjab municipal act, 1911, which were declared unconstitutional, have been held to be valid. since, the decision of the lower appellate court was based upon the judgment of this court ..... proper procedure under the punjab municipal act. the house tax is being recovered as per the provisions of the punjab municipal act. the demand of the house tax is legal. rest of the allegations of the plaint were denied. plaintiff filed ..... rs.no.2684 of 2002 (o&m) 3 statement. it has been alleged that in response to the notice under sections 65/67 of the punjab municipal act, the plaintiff filed the objections on 29.11.1994 and the assessment order has been passed by the defendant on 03.02.1995 after following the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 22 2014 (SC)

M/S. Sepal Hotel Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-22-2014

..... has stated that he is not ready to give any land for road or park without compensation. thus objection of the objector is rejected because under section 192 of the punjab municipal act, 1911 land to the extent of 25% without payment of compensation and an additional 10% with payment of compensation can be taken for the purpose or roads and parks under the ..... there is any mistake in the plan of the scheme, the same be got rectified. the objection regarding the demarcation was rejected by placing reliance on section 192 of the punjab municipal act, 1911, which permitted land to the extent of 25% to be taken without payment of compensation and additional 10% to be taken after payment of compensation.22. in the proceeding dated ..... yogender pal (supra) mention to which has been made in the beginning. as pointed out above that was a case where the vires of section 192 (1) (c) of the punjab municipal act were challenged as violative of article 14 of the constitution of india and the appellants therein succeed in their challenge. aforesaid provision was held to be unconstitutional as under this ..... the appropriate stage, suffice it is to mention at the stage that vide the said judgment this court declared section 192 (1) (c) of the punjab municipal act {this provision conforms to section 203 (1) (c) of the haryana municipal act} as void, being violative of article 14 of the constitution of india. however, overruling of the said provision was prospective i.e. from the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 2014 (HC)

Punjab State Warehousing Corporation Chandigarh Vs. State of Punjab an ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-09-2014

..... instead of hearing and deciding the case remanded by the additional deputy commissioner, issued a notice under section 68-a of the punjab municipal act, 1911 (for short 'the act').whereby house tax of `1,70,848.50 was imposed. this order was made applicable from 01.10.1987. for the year 1988-89 house tax was imposed at the ..... petition, it would be appropriate to give some background of the act. the act came into force in the state of punjab before partition of the country on october 01, 1911. the municipal council, zira was created after about four decades of coming into force of the act. section 61(1) of the act authorizes the municipal committee to impose a tax to be paid by the owner ..... on the buildings and lands not exceeding 15% of the annul value. the procedure to impose taxes is prescribed in section 62 of the act. section ..... act, 1962 is a statutory authority under article 12 of the constitution of india. the singh ravinder 2014.07.30 11:12 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh -2- cwp no.10102 of 2004 corporation has its godowns in different cities of punjab for storage of foodgrains. in zira town also the corporation has its godowns. the municipal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. Raj Paul Kansal Advocate Vs. Municipal Committee Dhuri Th ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-11-2014

..... to property tax. they are decided by common order. the writ petitions are to challenge the assessment to property tax issued by the municipal committee under the punjab municipal act, 1911. the petitioner's case was that he was not the owner but he was only a tenant of the premises. he had relied ..... only on the basis of the fair rent that property would fetc.and under the suggested rent that he would fetc.under the punjab rent restriction act. the punjab municipal act of 1911 stipulates through a definition under section 3(i) that annual value in case of building which is in the occupation of an ..... be that the rent note relied on by the owner could not be accepted by the municipal committee, the municipal committee is bound to assess the standard rent payable under the east punjab rent restriction act for the relevant year when the assessment was made and issue a fresh notice setting out details ..... proviso that calculation of annual value of building no account shall be taken of the furniture or machinery thereon. i asked the counsel for the municipal committee before the arguments got underway to let the court know the basis for the assessment made at ` kamboj pankaj kumar 2014.07.15 ..... cwp no.14146 of 1992 -1- in the high court for the states of punjab and haryana at chandigarh cwp no.14146 of 1992 date of decision.11.07.2014 amrit lal and others ......petitioners versus municipal committee, dhuri through its executive officer, dhuri, district sangrur and another ......respondents 2. cwp .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 15 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr. R.P.Kansal Advocate Vs. Municipal Committee, Sunam and Ot ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-15-2014

..... accounts clerk in the municipal committee, sunam, the relief sought by the petitioner cannot be granted to him. no ground for interference by this court is made out. ..... accounts clerk as admittedly, in the municipal committee, sunam, there was no post of accounts clerk. the municipal committee had recommended that the post of the petitioner be converted to the post of accounts clerk but the said recommendation was not accepted by the state while exercising powers under section 232 of the punjab municipal act, 1911. since there was no post of ..... civil writ petition no.8479 of 1993 -1- in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh civil writ petition no.8479 of 1993 date of decision: 15.5.2014. pawan kumar gupta .......petitioner versus municipal committee, sunam and others ......respondents coram: hon'ble mrs.justice sabina present: mr.r.p.kansal, advocate for the petitioner. mr.anshuman chopra ..... , advocate for mr.amarjeet markan, advocate for respondent no.1. mr.sushant maini, dag, punjab. **** sabina, j. petitioner has filed this petition challenging the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2014 (HC)

Kapil Deo Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-25-2014

..... dassu ram-respondent no.5 was not as per the site plan and he had made some more construction. notice under section 195(d) of the punjab municipal act, 1911 were given to dassu ram-respondent no.5. it is further stated that there is no encroachment done by dassu ram in the public street as ..... statement filed by the regional director on behalf of respondents no.1 to 3, a report was sought from responent no.4 i.e executive officer, municipal council and as per the report given by respondent no.4, dassu ram- respondent no.5 had not encroached in any way in the nagar council ..... is congested population area. so measurement of khasara no.959 cannot be done. no dispute was happened on the spot. on the spot shiv kumar, clerk, municipal council, kartarpur was also present. so report is present for further action."the executive officer made a report dated 25.8.2011 (annexure r-5) to the ..... boundary wall without getting the siteplan sanctioned by respondent no.4. notices were issued to dassu ram-respondent no.5 by the executive officer of the municipal council, kartarpur as per law for raising illegal construction and directing him to get the site plan sanctioned from kukreja ritu 2014.08.01 12:02 ..... is done by the sdm, dassu ram-respondent no.5 will not make any construction. an application was also made to the executive officer, municipal council to carry out the measurement of the length and breadth of the disputed public street (annexure p-8).as per written statement filed by respondent no .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 2014 (HC)

Present:mr.Karan Nehra Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-18-2014

..... (for the purpose of this section,- (1) the expression municipality . and the corporation . shall have the same meaning as assigned to them respectively, under the punjab municipal act, 1911 and the punjab municipal corporation act, 1976. (2) the expression social security fund . means a fund constituted under the punjab social security fund regulations, 2005 for providing financial assistance to the ..... needy, deserving and weaker sections of the society in the state of punjab through the welfare schemes. . 4 ..... . insertion of new schedule i-b in central act 2 of 1899.- in the principal act ..... two orders as well as the vires of the indian stamp (punjab amendment) act, 2005. counsel for the petitioner has asserted that the amendment act of the state of punjab to the extent it applies to the property falling within the municipal limits is not disputed but the same is discriminatory, arbitrary and irrational .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //