Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rationale Court: andhra pradesh Year: 1993 Page 1 of about 19 results (0.105 seconds)

Jun 14 1993 (HC)

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Venkatesh Foundry

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-14-1993

Reported in : [1994]92STC34(AP)

..... known to the market as such, like c.i. pipes, manhole covers, etc., are made from cast iron, such separate commodities are not attracted by the expression 'cast iron', the rationale being that sub-item (i) of item (iv) of section 14 of the central act takes in only 'goods which are in an unfinished form' and not commodities which are .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 1993 (HC)

Y. Chendrasekhara Rao and ors. Vs. Y.V. Kamala Kumari and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-02-1993

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3508

..... high court and on this aspect there was conflict of judicial opinion which was noticed by the law commission of india in its 41st report dated september 24, 1969. the rationale for incorporating a provision for directing release of a person on bail prior to his arrest, in the words of the law commission, is : 'the necessity for granting anticipatory bail .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 1993 (HC)

Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd., Shreeramnagar and Etc. Vs. A.P. State E ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-12-1993

Reported in : AIR1993AP183

..... ss. 13 and 14 of the electricity (supply) act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), (ii) the very classification of the industrial concerns as 'power intensive industries' lacks the rationale basis to the object sought to be achieved, in that, it suffers not only from the vice of discrimination but also of arbitrariness, (iii) the board is not a profit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 1993 (HC)

Sriramula Ramachandram and Others Vs. Sriramula Bhoodamma and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-17-1993

Reported in : AIR1994AP79

..... an opportunity of being heard. order 22, rules 3 and 4 codify these procedural safeguards translating into statutory requirement one of the principles of natural justice.'if this is the rationale behind rr. 3 and 4 of o.22, there can be no reasonfor precluding the legal representatives of a deceased defendant from bringing themselves on record on their own initiative ..... the default of respondents 1 and 2 in allowing the suit dismissed as against the 1st defendant as abated, on 1-7-1985.8. this is also supported by the rationale behind rr. 3 and 4 of o.22 of the civil procedure code. d.a. desai, j., in n. jayaram reddi v. revenue divisional officer, : [1979]3scr599 has stated that the basic .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 1993 (HC)

State Bank of India, Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. Union of India (Uo ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-22-1993

Reported in : 1994(2)ALT186

..... to grant the relief sought for, inasmuch as the suit claim is rs. 45,13,044/- and the court-fee was paid on the said claim and there is no rationale in denying the costs to the counsel for the 4th respondent-defendant on the value of the entire suit claim when the petitioner- plaintiff has paid fee to their advocate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 1993 (HC)

State Bank of India, Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. Anup Singh Sundarl ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-22-1993

Reported in : 1993(1)ALT705

..... to grant the relief sought for, inasmuch as the suit claim is rs. 45,13,044/- and the court-fee was paid on the said claim and there is no rationale in denying the costs to the counsel for the 4th respondent - defendant on the value of the entire suit claim when the petitioner- plaintiff has paid fee to their advocate .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 23 1993 (HC)

Smt. MangammA. (Died) and Another Vs. M.B. Subbaramappa Nayanimvaru an ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-23-1993

Reported in : AIR1994AP147

..... interpretation of this nature was not accepted by the supreme court in v. tulasamma v. v. sesha reddi, air 1977 sc 1944. explaining the scope and ambit and also the rationale behind section 14, it was held by p. n. bhagwati, j. (as he then was) speaking for himself and a. c. gupta j., that any interpretation of sub-section (2 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 1993 (HC)

P. Ram Reddy Vs. Land Acquisition Officer, Hyderabad Urban Development ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-19-1993

Reported in : 1993(2)ALT1

g. radhakrishna rao, j.1. these two appeals arise out of o.p.no. 129 of 1988 on the file of the additional subordinate judge, ranga reddy district, dated 18-1-1991 by which the learned subordinate judge enhanced the compensation by rs. 60/-per square yard over and above the compensation of rs. 20/- granted by the land acquisition officer, hyderabad urban development authority, hereinafter referred to, for short, as 'huda'; in other words, fixing the market value of the land acquired at rs. 80/- per square yard. having been aggrieved by the enhancement granted by the learned subordinate judge, the land acquisition officer, huda preferred a.s.no. 2087 of 1991. claimant has also preferred a.s.no. 1565 of 1991 claiming a total compensation at the rate of rs. 200/- per square yard.2. as both the appeals arise out of the same judgment, both the appeals are being disposed of by a common judgment.3. in order to appreciate the proper questions of law and fact involved in the matter, it would be necessary to refer to the salient features of the case, which are briefly as follows:-a total extent of ac. 14-35 guntas, situate in survey no. 161 of mylardevpalli village and s.no. 48/12, 48/13, 48/18, 48/19, 48/24, 48/26 and 57 of katedan village of rajendranagar mandal, was sought to be acquired for the purpose of formation of inner ring road from mylardevpalli-katedan, old kurnool road to join hyderabad-bangalore national highway no 7. out of the above said lands, the claimant p. ram reddy .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 1993 (HC)

Badi Guravaiah Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-14-1993

Reported in : 1994(2)ALT261; 1994(2)ALT(Cri)125; 1993CriLJ3496

g. radhakrishna rao, j. 1. this is an appeal preferred by the sole accused in sessions case no. 216 of 1990, on the file of the sessions judge, nellore, challenging his conviction for the offence under section 302, i.p.c. and sentence of imprisonment for life, imposed by the learned sessions judge, nellore by his judgment dated 31st january, 1992. 2. the case of the prosecution is briefly as follows :- the deceased venkatamma is the wife of the accused and p.w. 2 munaiah is their son. p.w. 1 is the mother of the deceased. the accused suspected the fidelity of his wife, the deceased on the ground that she developed illicit contact with one pamula ramachandraiah (p.w. 6). about six months prior to the death of the deceased, the accused shifted his residence to baddavolu and was residing with the deceased and his children in the house of madduru polaiah (p.w. 3) as a tenant. on 20th march, 1989 at about midnight p.w. 2 got up to answer calls of nature. he then heard his mother crying 'oyammo, oyinayano'. he, therefore, ran to his house and saw his father-accused beating his mother the deceased with a rice pounder. he immediately returned back, woke up p.w. 1 and reported to her what he saw. meanwhile, p.w. 3 heard the shrieks of the deceased and went there and questioned the accused as to why his wife was crying. the accused replied him that he found his wife sleeping with p.w. 6 and therefore he slapped her. thereupon he went and brought kantrati ramaiah and his wife bujjamma ( .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 1993 (HC)

R.B. Subrahmanyam and ors. Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Electricity Board, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-13-1993

Reported in : 1993(3)ALT462; 1993(3)ALT462; [1994(68)FLR1065]

ordereswara prasad, j. 1. on merger of two services in the respondents-electricity board, namely, chief controller of accounts and chief accounts officers, the employees working in both the offices formed a common cadre and an integrated list of the employees working in both the offices formed a common cadre and an integrated list of the employees, who are merged into a common cadre was published on 17-9-1976. one j. v. satyanarayana murthy was shown at serial no. 49 in the said integrated list. the petitioners are all seniors to the said satyanarayana murthy as per the integrated list. the grievance of the petitioners is that they are not given the scale of pay as was given to their junior satyanarayana murthy, and therefore, they pray for directions to the petitioner on par with the their junior mentioned at serial no. 49 of the integrated list and for further direction to the respondent was to pay all the arrears upto date after fixing pay and allowances. in the counter filed by the respondents, it is contended that satyanarayana murthy was given a higher scale of pay for the post of lower division clerk as he possessed higher qualification; being a graduate and that he was given higher scale of pay throughout until merger with the other department. it was further stated that the pay of satyanarayana murthy was protected at the time of merger and higher scale of pay was continued and that the petitioner cannot claim the same scale as was given to the said satyanarayana .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //