Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rationale Court: chennai Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 26 results (0.026 seconds)

Jun 27 2003 (HC)

The Commissioner, Mettupalayam Municipality Vs. the Nilgiris Co-operat ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-27-2003

Reported in : 2003(3)CTC481; (2003)2MLJ826

..... . under the above circumstances and in view of the admitted facts, i am of the positive opinion that business alone is the criterion for license and not the buildings. the rationale behind the levy is the business, that requires a license and not the building or the premises, though the same business might have been carried on, in different buildings, not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 21 2003 (HC)

V. Subramaniam Vs. the Central Bank of India Rep. by Its Managing Dire ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-21-2003

Reported in : (2003)IIILLJ146Mad

..... basis and any division which classified them into two groups by introducing a cut-off date would ordinarily violate the principle of equality in treatment unless there is a strong rationale discernible for so doing and the same can be supported on the ground that it will subserve the object sought to be achieved. but in the case of a new .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2003 (HC)

C. Damodarasamy Vs. Government of India Rep. by Its Secretary, Ministr ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-09-2003

Reported in : [2003(97)FLR655]; (2003)IILLJ469Mad

..... is contended that pension rules are arbitrary and irrational, inasmuch as they prescribe 1.11.93 as crucial date under rule 33, while dealing with compassionate allowance. there is no rationale behind the choice of the aforesaid date since all employees dismissed/removed, etc., before or after that date belong to the same class and there is no difference between them ..... on or before december 31, 1985 of the benefit of the pension scheme but for reasons stated above it was not practicable to extend the benefit to such retirees. the rationale for fixing the cut-off date as january 1, 1986 was the same as in the case of central government employees based on the recommendation of the fourth central pay .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 23 2003 (HC)

The Madras High Court Staff Association, Represented by Its Secretary, ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-23-2003

Reported in : (2004)1MLJ223

..... g.o. unlike any other executive or administrative action. therefore, we are convinced that when the reasons which weighed with the state government are considered, the same bear an acceptable rationale and does not suffer from any arbitrariness in order to interfere with the same. 52. as far as the other change which was brought out under the said g.o ..... made available to them as well and that the deprivation of the same for the reasons mentioned in the g.o. cannot be countenanced. we do not find any acceptable rationale in bringing out such a drastic change in the quantum of leave benefit and the basis of its determination and we therefore, hold that the said g.o. suffers from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 22 2003 (HC)

Sri Pandyan Travels, Represented by K. Devendran Vs. Commissioner of C ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-22-2003

Reported in : (2004)186CTR(Mad)677; 2004(91)ECC369; 2003LC654(Madras); 2004(163)ELT409(Mad); [2004]268ITR391(Mad); 2006[3]STR151; [2007]7STT159

..... the holders of contract carriage permits would be in any manner different from the holders of the stage carriage permits and the owners of the spare buses thereunder. the same rationale would apply even to the contract carriage vehicles covered by the permit under section 74 of the motor vehicles act. in fact, the most of the petitioners, who are having .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 18 2003 (HC)

Coimbatore District Real Estate Promoters' Association rep. by Its Pre ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-18-2003

Reported in : (2003)2MLJ806

..... act.11. it is alleged that the respondents have increased the guideline value from 01.04.1999 onwards by 20%, which is arbitrary, without any basis and there is no rationale behind such increase. according to the petitioner, there has been no demand for lands at all in coimbatore district consequent to the bomb-blast in coimbatore and other communal riots .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2003 (HC)

Premavathy @ Rajathi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Secretary to Gove ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-14-2003

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1475; 2004(2)CTC10

..... serious criminal charges. in our opinion, the classification between the foreigners as those who are not facing any criminal charges and those who are facing such charges would be a rationale, reasonable and valid classification. 31. learned counsel also tried to argue that the question of art. 21 relating to the breach of privacy right of the petitioners and the question .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 11 2003 (HC)

The Superintending Engineer, Tamil Nadu Housing Board and the Executiv ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-11-2003

Reported in : 2003(2)ARBLR546(Madras); (2003)2MLJ393

..... disables the appellant from claiming is escalation of unit rates. it does not apply to a claim for damages of the nature made by the appellant. to the case, the rationale of the judgment in rayanin's case (state of ap vs. r.v. rayanim 1990 (1) scc 433 squarely applies.' 21. placing reliance on the above judgment of the apex .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 10 2003 (HC)

Sundaram Finance Limited Vs. Kamaraj National Labour Organisation Rep. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-10-2003

Reported in : I(2004)BC138; (2004)IILLJ25Mad; (2004)1MLJ316; [2004]51SCL149(Mad)

..... first respondent union and in our opinion rightly so. once that position is clear, the very basis of the writ petition is knocked out and the very basis of the rationale used by the learned single judge is also knocked out because if the writ petition itself was based on the incorrect factual basis then, it could not be allowed to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 21 2003 (HC)

J.K. Pharmachem Limited, Sipcot Industrial Complex, Rep. by Its Sr. G. ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-21-2003

Reported in : (2004)1MLJ662

..... be specific, clear and unambiguous allegations in that behalf and it must be established that the impugned statute is based on discrimination as not referable to any classification, which is rationale and which has nexus with the object intended to be achieved by the said statute. in this respect, it is useful to refer to the pronouncement of the supreme court .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //