Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rationale Court: chennai Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 34 results (0.026 seconds)

Nov 16 2006 (HC)

M. Radhakrishnan Vs. the Secretary, the Bar Council of India and the S ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-16-2006

Reported in : AIR2007Mad108; 2006(5)CTC705

..... who have served as assistant judges no such restriction of age has been provided in rules 6(2)(i)(a) and (b) of the said rules. there is obviously no rationale nor any reasonableness for introduction of this age bar in regard to appointment by promotion to the post of an assistant judge. the rule, is therefore, arbitrary, and it violates ..... the age of 45 years and under the impugned rule they are not debarred from practising. therefore, in the first place there is no dependable material in support of the rationale on which the rule is founded and secondly the rule is discriminatory as it debars one group of persons who have crossed the age of 45 years from enrolment while ..... . the said discussion is available in para no. 13 of the judgment, which is extracted below:13. the next question is, is the rule reasonable or arbitrary and unreasonable? the rationale for the rule, as stated earlier, is to maintain the dignity and purity of the profession by keeping out those who retire from various government, quasi-government and other institutions ..... (1)(g) and 21 of the constitution and section 24 of the advocates act, 1961. the bar council of india, in the form of a counter affidavit, highlighted that the rationale is that the profession of law being a pious and honourable profession, its main object being service of mankind by serving the system of administration of justice, it is the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2006 (HC)

Pon Paramaguru, Director General of Police (Retd.) Vs. State of Tamil ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-31-2006

Reported in : 2006(2)CTC241; (2006)3MLJ129

..... the effect that to place such restrictions on the state government in the matter of personnel management on the ground that it would disrupt the electoral process is stretching and rationale to illogical extremes and indeed it interfere with the right of the state government to determine exigencies of public interest and running the day-to-day administration of the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 2006 (HC)

M. Dinesh Kumar Vs. the Tamilnadu Dr. Ambedkar Government Law Universi ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-09-2006

Reported in : 2007(1)CTC457

..... more sessions and the recommended punishment was approved by the syndicate in its meeting held, on 7.12.2005. this punishment could not be said as exorbitant but it is rationale. further, the candidates, who have caused disturbances and commotions in the examination hall in other centres in which the examinations were conducted, were similarly placed and imposed similar punishment. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 25 2006 (HC)

R. Aravazhi Vs. the Secretary, the Selection Committee, the Director o ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Aug-25-2006

Reported in : (2006)4MLJ1290

..... entitled to preference for admission. merit must be the test when choosing the best, according to this rule of equal chance for equal marks'. their lordships further held that the rationale of reservation must be in the case of medical students, removal of regional or class inadequacy or like disadvantage. the quantum of reservation should not be excessive or societally injurious .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 08 2006 (HC)

Apollo Hospitals Enterprises Limited Represented by Mr. S.K.Venkataram ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-08-2006

Reported in : (2006)206CTR(Mad)426; [2006]287ITR25(Mad); (2006)3MLJ1106

..... to be an industrial undertaking which has nothing to do with the question.viii) the very communication dated 03.01.2005 discloses that the proceedings have been initiated not on rationale grounds but scanty enquiry and appreciation of the facts of the case as evidenced by question no. 1, no. 3 and no. 5 of the letter enclosed to notice under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2006 (HC)

The Principal, Kendriya Vidyala Sangathan Vs. D. Sarala and the Regist ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-21-2006

Reported in : (2006)4MysLJ372

..... it or forfeit the hra. the management cannot be saddled with double liability, viz, to construct and maintain the quarters as well as to pay the hra. this is the rationale of the provisions of paragraph 4 of the said government office memorandum.6. it is for this reason again that paragraph 4(b)(i) provides that the hra shall not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 02 2006 (HC)

J. Jayalalitha, Vs. the Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-02-2006

Reported in : (2007)209CTR(Mad)305

..... sentence prescribed was only three months which is contrary to the concept of equality. the court observed that the sub-sections operate in different fields and that there is a rationale behind the classification, the equality contemplated under article 14 of the constitution cannot be considered to have been violated. the contention which has been raised is based mainly on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 2006 (HC)

Vellakoil Vattara Vari Seluthuvor Nalvalvu Sangam, Rep. by Its Preside ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-09-2006

Reported in : 2006(2)CTC705; (2006)3MLJ31

..... is 92 of 1999. the said sangam has been established with an avowed object to protect its members from arbitrary and unreasonable levy and enhancement of property tax without any rationale. in view of the limited issue raised and the judgment to be passed hereunder, we are of the view that there is no need to go into the factual details .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 19 2006 (HC)

S. Sridhar and the New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Kannupaiyan ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-19-2006

Reported in : (2006)3MLJ779

..... . 5,000/- p.m. however, the tribunal determined the income of the deceased at rs. 4,500/- p.m., which according to the insurance company is not based on any rationale or logic. the total compensation awarded by the tribunal is rs. 4,32,000/- based on the abovesaid income.8. the only dispute now is relating to the determination of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 24 2006 (HC)

S.M.S. Lakshmi Vs. the Government of India, Represented by Its Secreta ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-24-2006

Reported in : (2006)4MLJ1425

..... expectation for grant of any scheme at the relevant time, besides it is also not easy to get the certificate from foreign countries, hence, the respondents are required to follow rationale approach and not a technical approach. the case of the claimants under this scheme is required to be determined on the basis of probabilities and not on the touchstone of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //