Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rationale Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1970 Page 1 of about 4 results (0.067 seconds)

Apr 28 1970 (HC)

Madan Tarlok Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through Home Secy ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-28-1970

Reported in : AIR1970P& H471

..... . in this connection, reference may be made to the decision of the supreme court in bharat kala bhandar (pvt.) ltd. v. municipal committee, dhamangaon, air 1966 sc 249, wherein the rationale for enacting section 142a of the government of india act, 1935: and on which article 276 of the constitution now rests, is explained. the majority view in this decision, so .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 18 1970 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. S. Raghbir Singh Trust

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-18-1970

Reported in : [1971]80ITR515(P& H)

d.k. mahajan, j.1. this reference relates to the assessment year 1954-55--the account year ending on march 31, 1954. the assessee is s. raghbir singh trust, district amritsar, raja sansi (hereinafter referred to as 'the trust').2. the relevant facts, necessary for the determination of the question of law that has been referred for our opinion, may now be stated. s. raghbir singh (hereinafter referred to as 'assessee') was originally a member of the joint hindu family consisting of himself, his sons and his wife. this family disrupted on the 10th of april, 1953. the assets of the family were partitioned. s. raghbir singh received 400 shares of simbhaoli sugar mills p. ltd. among other assets of the joint hindu family, as his share. he was also assigned the obligation to pay off a debt of nearely four lakhs of rupees which had been contracted by the joint hindu family and was due to rai bahadur seth jessa ram fateh chand. on the 14th of april, 1953, the assessee executed a deed of trust, whereby he constituted a trust of 300 out of 400 shares of simbhaoli sugar mills. the trustees appointed under the trust deed undertook to accept the obligations and to carry out the same in accordance with the objects of the trust. the relevant objects of the trust were, to pay the debts in the first place and, thereafter, to provide funds for the maintenance and education of the assessee's children and grandchildren. 80 per cent. of the income of the trust was to be spent on the children and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1970 (HC)

Shamsher Singh Hukam Singh Vs. the Punjab State and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-19-1970

Reported in : AIR1970P& H372

sarkaria, j.1. the question referred to this full bench is:'whether the provisions of clause (3) of article 15 can be invoked for construing and determining the scope of clause (2) of article 16 of the constitution, and if so, to what extent and in what kind of cases'?2. some material facts giving rise to this reference may first be noted:prior to the 12th of may, 1963, in the united state of punjab, there were two branches of the punjab education service, non-gazetted (class iii) school cadre, in the grade of rs. 110-8-190/10-250. one was exclusively manned by men and the other by women. the members of both the branches were either employed on teaching work or on inspection work. by a memorandum no. 1965-ed-iii (2e)-61/8123, dated 21st/27th march, 1961, the government of punjab granted special pay equivalent to 25' per cent of basic pay but not exceeding rs. 50/- per month, to the women's branch, who were posted as assistant district inspectresses of schools. subsequently, (per memorandum no. 1/49-63-imp-cell, dated 9th/10th april. 19g3) the education department in the field of school-cum-inspection was reorganised. the assistant district inspectors and the assistant district inspectresses were designated as block education officers and a unified cadre came into existence with effect from may 12, 1963, after the above reorganisation, the block education officers, both males and females,. have to perform identical duties. their scales and responsibilities are the same. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 05 1970 (HC)

Calcutta Insurance Ltd. Vs. Bhupinder Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-05-1970

Reported in : (1970)72PLR724

a.d. koshal, j. 1. this is a petition for revision of the order dated the 29th of january, 1970, of shri pritam singh pattar, motor accident claims tribunal, amritsar, directing that the son (respondent no. 1) and daughter (respondent no. 2) of shri kartar singh who had filed before him an application under section 110-a of the motor vehicles act (hereinafter referred to as ' the act') claiming an amount of rs. 20,000 from respondents nos. 3 and 4, as well as the petitioner before me on account of physical and mental pain suffered by him (kartar singh) as a result of the injuries which he sustained in an accident on the 21st may, 1967, at about 6.30 p.m., be brought on the record as his (kartar singh's) legal representatives after his death. respondent no. 3 is the proprietor and respondent no. 4 is the driver of truck no. pno-2195 which was involved in the accident while the petitioner is the insurance company with which the truck was under insurance on the saiddate.2. kartar singh above mentioned died on the 16th october, 1969, whilehis application under section 110-a of the act was pending with the tribunal, who accepted the prayer of respondents nos. 1 and 2 to be allowed to continue the application as his legal representatives. reliance in this connectionwas placed by the tribunal on chuhar mal ishar das v. haji wali mohd. in which it was held that order 32 of the code of civil procedure did not apply to an application under section 110-a of the act, that, such an .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //