Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rationale Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 23 results (0.021 seconds)

Jan 18 1995 (HC)

JaIn Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-18-1995

Reported in : AIR1995P& H243; (1995)109PLR614

..... the land of proprietors for common good and deprive them of their titles in order to vest the same in its manager by the other enactment which is impugned. the rationale of the decisions cited above that management being (is) no acquisition does not violate article 31a.52. in the very nature of things the land cannot be provided to every .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 1995 (HC)

United Receland Limited and anr. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-17-1995

Reported in : (1996)114PLR227

..... respect to the dealers dealing with the export of rice and with respect to the dealers left out of the purview of payment of purchase tax had no nexus or rationale with the object sought to be achieved. it is further contended that the petitioners are not liable to pay interest in any way particularly when their acts have been held .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1995 (HC)

Babu Ram Vs. State of Punjab Through Its Collector and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-20-1995

Reported in : (1995)111PLR59

..... to have retired the appellant from service w.e.f. 30.4.1990.10. i am also of the opinion that the learned lower appellate court totally misunderstood the true rationale of the decision of this court in anand parkash v. state of haryana, 1982(2) s.l.r. 368, as well as another decision of this court in rajbir singh .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 1995 (HC)

Ganpati Udyog and anr. Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-11-1995

Reported in : (1996)113PLR437

..... case where the lower court has refused to admit evidence which ought to have been admitted or the evidence which could not be produced by a party after due diligence. rationale of the order passed by the additional district judge can be discovered from the following observations made by him :-'there is no dispute about the fact that the statement of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 1995 (HC)

Bhupinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-07-1995

Reported in : (1995)111PLR387

..... the cinema owners challenged this lumpsum levy of tax in the high court of punjab and haryana. ultimately it was felt that in order to remove the legal lacunae, some rationale system of levy and collection of entertainment tax may be adopted. the pattern of andhra pradesh cinematograph act was found to be the most appropriate with certain modifications as applicable .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 1995 (HC)

Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab Through the Secretary to the Govern ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-16-1995

Reported in : (1995)111PLR205

..... patent violation of transfer policy coupled with substantial allegations of mala fides or colourable exercise of power may be enable the court to call upon the government to explain the rationale of transfer and in such case a bald plea that the transfer has been effected in public interest or on administrative ground will not be a sufficient answer. the respondents .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 1995 (HC)

Balwant Singh Vs. Labour Court and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-23-1995

Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ635P& H; (1995)111PLR298

..... whatsoever for the delay. if the analogy of the statute of limitation can be invoked in proceedings under articles 32 and 226 of the constitution, there appears to be no rationale for the view that the workman shall be entitled to the grant of relief irrespective of the delay and that the labour court shall have no jurisdiction to decline the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 1995 (HC)

K.K. Kalsi and ors. Vs. Chandigarh Administration (U.T.) Through Its A ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-13-1995

Reported in : (1995)111PLR694

v.k. jhanji, j. 1. this shall dispose civil writ petitions no. 1042, 1043, 1307, 1577, 1633, 1662, 1674, 1967, 2867, 3140, 5179, 5490, 4257, 4258, 1996 and 10872 of 1994 as common question of law and facts is involved therein.2. in the year 1989, chandigarh housing board, chandigarh (hereinafter referred to as the board) floated a self financing housing scheme (1989) for general public of two categories of multi-storeyed flats namely categories i and ii. applications were invited for registration of applicants for the allotment of these two categories of flats. in category-i the covered area of the flat was to be 1895 sq. ft. at tentative price of rs. four lacs and in category-ii the covered area of the flat was to be 1440 sq. ft. at tentative price of three lacs. in response to the advertisements, the petitioners applied against categories i and ii flats under the self financing housing scheme and on being successful in the draw of lots the petitioners were issued acceptance/demand letters by the board. as per acceptance and demand letters, the schedule of payment for category-i was as under :-'i) amount to be paid within 30 days from thedate of issue of this letter rs. 60,000/-ii) 1st half yearly instalment by 10.5.1991 rs. 1.00 lacs,iii) 2nd half yearly instalment by 10.11.1991 rs. 1.00 lacs:iv) 3rd half yearly instalment by 10.5.1992 rs. 80,000/-v) at the time of possession balance as percost finally fixed.'the schedule of payment of category-ii was as under :-i) amount .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 1995 (HC)

State of Haryana Vs. Free Wheel (India) Limited

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-05-1995

Reported in : (1996)112PLR729

ashok bhan, j.1. this order shall dispose of sales tax cases 16 and 17, both of 1986, pertaining to the assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73, as common questions of law and facts are involved in both these cases.2. the facts are taken from s.t.c. 16 of 1986.3. sales tax tribunal, haryana (hereinafter referred to as 'the tribunal') had decided three appeals pertaining to three assessment years 1970-71, 1971-72 and 1972-73, by passing separate orders. state of haryana (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioner') filed three petitions under section 42(1) of the haryana general sales tax act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), for referring certain questions of law arising out of the orders of the tribunal of this court for opinion. these petitions were dismissed on 15.10.1985. copies of the orders passed in the three petitions were supplied to the petitioner on 20.11.1985. instead of filing three separate petitions under section 42(2) of the act, for issuing a mandamus directing the tribunals to make a reference to the high court for its opinion, petitioner filed one joint petition i.e. s.t.c. 1 of 1986, for all the three assessment years i.e. 1970-71, 1971-72 and 1972-73.4. respondent-assessee filed an application on 25.7.1986, taking an objection that a joint petition for all the three assessment years was not maintainable and the petitioner should have filed three separate petitions for the three assessment years.5. prior to the final disposal of s.t.c. 1 of 1986, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 1995 (HC)

Rakesh Kumar Singla Vs. State of Haryana Through Financial Commissione ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-21-1995

Reported in : (1995)111PLR411

jawahar lal gupta, j. 1. whether the service rendered as a result of ad hoc appointment could be counted for the purpose of 12 years' regular service in the context of circular no. 6/38/3pr(fd)-87, dated 2.6.1989 of the government of haryana? this is the short question that has been posed for consideration. to appreciate the context in which this question has arisen, the facts may be briefly noticed.2. on january 4, 1980, the petitioner was appointed as an assistant engineer on ad hoc basis. on being selected by the haryana public service commission, he was given regular appointment order dated january 29, 1982. on january 15, 1992 the petitioner made a representation that he having been appointed on january 4, 1980 had completed 12 years of service and was entitled to the grant of selection grade of rs. 4100-5300 in accordance with the policy decision notified by the government of haryana vide letter dated june 2, 1989. the government did not accept the petitioner's claim. he has consequently, approached this court through the present writ petition. the petitioner rests his claim not only on the letter dated june 2, 1989 but also on the three decisions of different division benches of this court in ajit kumar jain v. state of punjab, 1992(1) r.s.j. 362, brish bhan mittal v. state of haryana, civil writ petition no. 6235 of 1993. decided on september 17, 1993 and suresh chander chhabra v. state of haryana, civil writ petition no. 389 of 1994 decided on august 30, 1994.3. the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //