Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rationale Sorted by: old Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 23 results (0.021 seconds)

Jan 18 1995 (HC)

JaIn Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-18-1995

Reported in : AIR1995P& H243; (1995)109PLR614

..... the land of proprietors for common good and deprive them of their titles in order to vest the same in its manager by the other enactment which is impugned. the rationale of the decisions cited above that management being (is) no acquisition does not violate article 31a.52. in the very nature of things the land cannot be provided to every .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1995 (HC)

Babu Ram Vs. State of Punjab Through Its Collector and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-20-1995

Reported in : (1995)111PLR59

..... to have retired the appellant from service w.e.f. 30.4.1990.10. i am also of the opinion that the learned lower appellate court totally misunderstood the true rationale of the decision of this court in anand parkash v. state of haryana, 1982(2) s.l.r. 368, as well as another decision of this court in rajbir singh .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 1995 (HC)

Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab Through the Secretary to the Govern ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-16-1995

Reported in : (1995)111PLR205

..... patent violation of transfer policy coupled with substantial allegations of mala fides or colourable exercise of power may be enable the court to call upon the government to explain the rationale of transfer and in such case a bald plea that the transfer has been effected in public interest or on administrative ground will not be a sufficient answer. the respondents .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 1995 (HC)

Balwant Singh Vs. Labour Court and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-23-1995

Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ635P& H; (1995)111PLR298

..... whatsoever for the delay. if the analogy of the statute of limitation can be invoked in proceedings under articles 32 and 226 of the constitution, there appears to be no rationale for the view that the workman shall be entitled to the grant of relief irrespective of the delay and that the labour court shall have no jurisdiction to decline the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 1995 (HC)

Bhupinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-07-1995

Reported in : (1995)111PLR387

..... the cinema owners challenged this lumpsum levy of tax in the high court of punjab and haryana. ultimately it was felt that in order to remove the legal lacunae, some rationale system of levy and collection of entertainment tax may be adopted. the pattern of andhra pradesh cinematograph act was found to be the most appropriate with certain modifications as applicable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 1995 (HC)

United Receland Limited and anr. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-17-1995

Reported in : (1996)114PLR227

..... respect to the dealers dealing with the export of rice and with respect to the dealers left out of the purview of payment of purchase tax had no nexus or rationale with the object sought to be achieved. it is further contended that the petitioners are not liable to pay interest in any way particularly when their acts have been held .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 11 1995 (HC)

Ganpati Udyog and anr. Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-11-1995

Reported in : (1996)113PLR437

..... case where the lower court has refused to admit evidence which ought to have been admitted or the evidence which could not be produced by a party after due diligence. rationale of the order passed by the additional district judge can be discovered from the following observations made by him :-'there is no dispute about the fact that the statement of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 1995 (HC)

Anup Singh Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-03-1995

Reported in : (1995)110PLR277

orderg.s. singhvi, j.1. the petitioner had appeared in combined entrance test, conducted by guru nanak dev university, amritsar, in may, 1994 for admission to the engineering course. result of the test was declared on 21.6.1994. the petitioner was assigned merit position at no. 208. before appearing in the test, he had passed 10 + 1 and 10 + 2 examination from chandigarh. on the basis of his performance at the test, the petitioner applied for admission to various col- leges in the state of punjab. interview for final allocation of the college and the subject was held on 22.7.1994. the petitioner appeared before the examination-committee. he was granted admission in the subject of electronics at baba banda singh engineering college, fatehgarh saheb. the petitioner presented himself before the principal of the college on 22.7.1994, but his request was not entertained. on that day, the principal of the college refused admission to the petitioner on the ground that he did not fulfil the conditions of eligibility prescribed by that college. the petitioner was directed to contact the coordinator, cet admissions-94 (respondent no. 2). therefore, the petitioner met respondent no. 2 and moved an application for admission pending decision of the dispute on the question of his eligibility. on this application, respondent no. 2 recorded a note that the case may be treated as a disputed case and he may be given admission. the petitioner then contacted head of the trust, which runs baba .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 1995 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Shadi Lal Puri

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-09-1995

Reported in : (1995)125CTR(P& H)300

r.p. sethi, j.1. through the medium of this writ petition (sic), the revenue has prayed for issuance of a direction to the income-tax appellate tribunal, requiring it to state the case and refer the same to this court in terms of the prayer made in the application filed under sub-section (1) of section 256 of the income-tax act, 1961. the appellate tribunal, vide its order dated august 1, 1990, had accepted the appeal of the assessee and set aside the order of assessment, holding that no case was made out for addition of a sum of rs. 97,746 as had been done by the income-tax authorities. it is submitted that the questions of law, formulated in the present petition are such questions of law, which are required to be referred to this court for adjudication. in support of his submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the decision in cit v. s. p. jain : [1973]87itr370(sc) .2. the jurisdiction of the high court can be invoked under section 256 of the income-tax act for interpretation of any provision of the statute or for settlement of a legal controversy, not adjudicated earlier. the jurisdiction conferred upon this court is purely advisory and was never intended to secure general interpretation or guidance than to grant relief in any particular case. while exercising such jurisdiction, the high court neither acts as a court of appeal, nor as a revisional court. the supreme court in c. vasantlal and co. v. cit : [1962]45itr206(sc) has held that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 1995 (HC)

Bachan Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-24-1995

Reported in : (1996)112PLR170

s.s. grewal, j.1. this regular second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 27th of may, 1993 passed by the additional district judge, gurdaspur, whereby the appeal filed by the plaintiff-appellant against the order of dismissal of his suit by the senior sub-judge, gurdaspur dated 21st of march, 1991 was dismissed.2. the plaintiff-appellant had filed suit for declaration to the effect that the impugned order no. 11096-11102/ac-2 dated 16.10.1987 passed by defendant respondent no.2 rejecting the request for withdrawal of notice for voluntary retirement sought by the plaintiff was illegal and liable to be set aside. it was pleaded that vide application dated 31st july, 1987 the plaintiff-appellant, who was posted as sub-inspector with punjab armed police had sought voluntary retirement by giving three months notice. however, before the expiry of the period of the said notice, the plaintiff-appellant made a written request to the defendant-respondents for withdrawal of his notice for voluntary retirement. despite this the plaintiff was served with the impugned order dated 16.10.1987. thus the plaintiff was illegally retired from service with effect from 31.10.1987 without proper consideration of his request for withdrawal of his notice for voluntary retirement. the order passed by the defendant-respondents was illegal, unlawful, ultravires, unconstitutional, null and void on the following grounds :-(a) the impugned order dated 16.10.1987 has been passed in .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //