Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rationale Sorted by: old Court: supreme court of india Year: 1999 Page 1 of about 78 results (0.088 seconds)

Feb 10 1999 (SC)

M/S. Industrial Credit and Development Syndicate Now Called I.C.D.S. L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-10-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC1036; 1999(2)ALLMR(SC)434; [1999]96CompCas1(SC); JT1999(1)SC430; (1999)IIMLJ114(SC); 1999(1)SCALE393; (1999)3SCC80; [1999]1SCR555

..... part to be adjusted towards the interest due etc. in meka venkatadari appa rao bahadur zamindar gam v. raja parthasarthy appa rao bahadur zamindar gam air (1922) pc 233 the rationale was explained thus: there are moneys that are received without a definite appropriation on the one side or on the other, and the rule which is well established in ordinary .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 17 1999 (SC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kasturi and Sons Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-17-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC1275; (1999)153CTR(SC)1; [1999]237ITR24(SC); JT1999(2)SC272; 1999(2)SCALE75; (1999)3SCC346; [1999]1SCR1207

..... placed upon the judgment of this court in cit v . artex mfg. co. : [1997]227itr260(sc) . the bench referred to the provisions of section 41(2) and while analysing the rationale of the section quoted the following passage found in an earlier judgment in cit v. bipinchandra maganlal & co. ltd. : [1961]41itr290(sc) :'in cit v. bipinchandra maganlal & co. ltd, : [1961 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 13 1999 (SC)

M/S. Surana Steels Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-13-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC1455; [1999]237ITR777(SC); JT1999(5)SC192; 1999(2)SCALE549; (1999)4SCC306; [1999]2SCR589

..... a suggestion that a time has now come to abandon it.8. in the budget speech of 1987, the minister of finance referring to the proposed section 115j explained the rationale behind its introduction in these words :-it is only fair and proper that the prosperous should pay at least some tax. the phenomenon of so called zero tax highly profitable .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 1999 (SC)

Handloom House Ernakulam Vs. Regional Director, Esi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-29-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC1697; [1999(82)FLR618]; JT1999(3)SC291; (1999)ILLJ1319SC; 1999(3)SCALE76; (1999)4SCC7; [1999]2SCR943; (1999)3UPLBEC1957

..... or not. it is clear that any additional remuneration paid at intervals exceeding two months has been excluded by specific terms, from the purview of the definition. what is the rationale for excluding such remuneration paid at intervals exceeding two months from the scope of 'wages'? though we did not get any clue from the statement of objects and reasons for ..... the bill (which became employees state insurance (amendment) act 1951), the rationale could be discerned as inter-linked with the definition clause 'wage period' in section 2(23). it reads thus:wage period' in relation to an employee means the period in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 13 1999 (SC)

A.K. Singh and ors. Vs. Uttarakhand Jan Morcha and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-13-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC2193; 1999CriLJ3500; JT1999(4)SC414; 1999(3)SCALE550; (1999)4SCC476; [1999]3SCR624; 1999(2)LC962(SC)

..... were given to the victims of molestation, rs. fifty thousand each for 398 persons who were detained by the police.12. all the learned counsel made scathing attack on the rationale of the high court in fixing up such huge sum as compensation at a premature stage. they contended that the high court while imposing such heavy liability on the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 13 1999 (SC)

Union of India and ors. Vs. Anil Kumar and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-13-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC2229; JT1999(4)SC502; 1999(4)SCALE61; (1999)5SCC743; [1999]3SCR835; 2000(2)SLJ129(SC); (1999)3UPLBEC1799

..... reasoning or the conclusions arrived at by the central administrative tribunal in this regard. the action of putting the assistant foremen en bloc junior to the ssas was without any rationale or valid basis of which has rightly been held to be arbitrary being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteeing equality in service matters.29. this view is strengthened more on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 1999 (SC)

State of Kerala Vs. V. Padmnabhan Nair

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-14-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC2405; 1999CriLJ3696; 1999(3)Crimes103(SC); 1999(2)CTC643; JT1999(4)SC499; 1999(2)KLT782(SC); 1999(II)OLR(SC)334; 1999(4)SCALE82; (1999)5SCC690; [1999]3SCR864

..... sole premise that the offence under section 406 of the ipc has also been fastened against the accused besides section 409 of the ipc. we are unable to discern the rationale in the distinguishment. sections 406 and 409 of the ipc are cognate offences in which the common component is criminal breach of trust. when the offender in the offence under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 1999 (SC)

State of Punjab Vs. Baldev Singh, Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-21-1999

Reported in : (1999)157CTR(SC)3

..... consequences that may entail the possession of illicit articles under the ndps act. it appears to have been incorporated in the act keeping in view the severity of the punishment. the rationale behind the provision is even otherwise manifest. the search before a gazetted officer or a magistrate would impart much more authenticity and creditworthiness to the search and seizure proceeding. it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 1999 (SC)

Dr. Preeti Srivastava and anr. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-10-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC2894a; [1999]Supp1SCR249

..... in the qualifying marks between the reserved category and the general category is smaller, 35% for the reserved category and 45% for the general category. we see no logic or rationale for the difference to be larger at the post-graduate level.standard of education:32. a large differentiation in the qualifying marks between the two groups of students would make .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 1999 (SC)

Dr Preeti Srivastava and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-10-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC2894; JT1999(5)SC498; 1999(4)SCALE579; (1999)7SCC120

..... in the qualifying marks between the reserved category and the general category is smaller, 35% for the reserved category and 45% for the general category. we see no logic or rationale for the difference to be larger at the post-graduate level.standard of education:31. a large differentiation in the qualifying marks between the two groups of students would make .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //