Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rationale Sorted by: old Year: 1999 Page 2 of about 477 results (0.025 seconds)

Feb 10 1999 (SC)

M/S. Industrial Credit and Development Syndicate Now Called I.C.D.S. L ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-10-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC1036; 1999(2)ALLMR(SC)434; [1999]96CompCas1(SC); JT1999(1)SC430; (1999)IIMLJ114(SC); 1999(1)SCALE393; (1999)3SCC80; [1999]1SCR555

..... part to be adjusted towards the interest due etc. in meka venkatadari appa rao bahadur zamindar gam v. raja parthasarthy appa rao bahadur zamindar gam air (1922) pc 233 the rationale was explained thus: there are moneys that are received without a definite appropriation on the one side or on the other, and the rule which is well established in ordinary .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 1999 (HC)

Rupendra Kumar Singh Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Feb-12-1999

..... )iillj812sc , that appointment on compassionate ground is not violative of article 16(2) of the constitution of india. therefore, this question has already been considered by the supreme court. the rationale for this finding of the supreme court is that when exceptional circumstance do exist as a result of sudden death of the bread earner, such appointment are made in order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 1999 (TRI)

Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on : Feb-12-1999

Reported in : (1999)(107)ELT337TriDel

..... , movable, saleable and marketable. the duty is on manufacture or production but the production or manufacture is carried on for taking such goods to the market for sale. the obvious rationale for levying excise duty linking it with production or manufacture is that the goods so produced must be a distinct commodity known as such in common parlance or to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 1999 (TRI)

B.S.H. Rao Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Feb-16-1999

..... case (supra) as also in vipin hiralal shah's case (supra) which we have already discussed above.31. it will not be out of place to take note of the rationale which the respondents had in mind for the purpose of liberalisation of the procedure for ad hoc promotions to senior scale in favour of group b officers which is found .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1999 (HC)

Mani JaIn Vs. Sub-divisional Forest Officer-cum-authorised Officer and ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-18-1999

Reported in : 1999(2)MPLJ81

..... made by any person either to the high court or to the sessions judge, no further application by the same person shall be entertained by the other of them.'the rationale behind it to prevent multiplicity of revision petitions in criminal matters. but the present controversy does not fall under the criminal procedure code and would not invite the bar of second revision .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 18 1999 (HC)

Smt. Mani JaIn Vs. Sub-div. Forest Officer and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Feb-18-1999

Reported in : 1999CriLJ1800

..... by any person either to the high court or to the sessions judge, no further application by the same person shall be entertained by one or other of them. the rationale behind it to prevent multiplicity of revision petitions in criminal matters. but the present controversy does not fall under the cr. p.c. and would not invite the bar of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 1999 (HC)

Shyam Sunder Misra Vs. Labour Court, Lucknow and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-23-1999

Reported in : 1999(3)AWC2170; [2000(84)FLR196]

..... to do so on such terms and conditions as it may think fit, a discretion to be exercised judicially. exercise of such discretion requires to be justified by the rationale of the approach. rationale of approach is to be supported by the materials on record.17. in the present case, there is nothing on record to come to a conclusion that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1999 (HC)

C.R. Poorna Pragna Vs. the Chairman, Land Tribunal, Koratagere Taluk, ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-02-1999

Reported in : ILR1999KAR2583; 1999(3)KarLJ591

..... out the possibility that in a small number of cases where genuine errors had occurred that it was not possible to correct those mistakes but one needs to understand the rationale behind imposing the bar insofar as the parties had a good five years time within which if at all any such mistakes had occurred, there was ample scope to rectify .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1999 (FN)

El Paso Natural Gas Co. Vs. Neztsosie

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-02-1999

..... attention of congress either, congress probably would never have expected an occasion for asserting tribal jurisdiction over claims like these. now and then silence is not pregnant. because the comity rationale for tribal exhaustion normally appropriate to a tribal court's determination of its jurisdiction stops short of the price-anderson act, the district 488 court should have decided whether respondents ..... , and administrative or judicial decisions," id., at 855-856 (footnote omitted). the same "considerations of comity," iowa mut. ins. co. v. laplante, 480 u. s. 9 , 15 (1987), provided the rationale for extending the doctrine to cases where a defendant in tribal court asserts federal-diversity jurisdiction in a related action in district court. id., at 16. exhaustion was appropriate in ..... from deciding a question of tribal-court jurisdiction until the tribal courts themselves had addressed the matter. the court of appeals approved the abstention on the theory that the comity rationale underlying the tribal exhaustion doctrine applied. see 136 f. 3d, at 613-615, 620. we think, however, that it does not. national farmers union ins. coso v. crow tribe, 471 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1999 (HC)

Smt. B. Suvarna Malini and Others Vs. Karnataka Administrative Tribuna ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-02-1999

Reported in : ILR1999KAR2179; 1999(6)KarLJ6

..... the holder of a postgraduate degree from one university is not necessarily of the same standard as the holder of the same postgraduate degree from another university. that is the rationale of the test prescribed by the said regulations. it falls squarely within the scope of entry 66 and the ugc act inasmuch as it is intended to co-ordinate standards .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //