Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rationale Sorted by: recent Court: chennai Year: 2017 Page 1 of about 22 results (0.028 seconds)

Mar 01 2017 (HC)

M/s. JKM Graphics Solutions Private Limited, Rep. by S. Ravi, Director ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-01-2017

..... of sales tax, the supreme court while considering the provisions for the grant of a set off under rule 41(9) of the bombay sales tax rules, 1959, explained the rationale for a set off as follows: the judgment of the supreme court enunciates that (i) the dealer has no legal right to claim a set off of the purchase tax .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2017 (HC)

T.K. Subramaniam and Another Vs. Rukmani

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-20-2017

..... cases, the case reported in (2011) 4 supreme court cases 363 the hon'ble court has stated as follows: 28. we are at a loss to fathom any logic or rationale, which could have impelled the high court to condone the delay after holding the same to be unjustifiable. the concepts such as liberal approach , justice oriented approach , substantial justice cannot .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 17 2017 (HC)

M. Kannan Vs. State rep by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police S ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-17-2017

..... be true of men of intelligence, how much more true is it of the ignorant and illiterate or those of feeble intellect. both powell and gideon involved felonies. but their rationale has relevance to any criminal trial, where an accused is deprived of his liberty. the court should consider the probable sentence that will follow if a conviction is obtained. the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2017 (HC)

Molly Mathai Vs. P. Basantha Kumar and Others

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-18-2017

..... right that has accrued to it in law as a result of his acting vigilantly" 24. .. .. 25. .. .. 26. .. .. 27. .. .. 28. we are at a loss to fathom any logic or rationale, which could have impelled the high court to condone the delay after holding the same to be unjustifiable. the concepts such as "liberal approach", "justice oriented approach", "substantial justice" can .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2017 (HC)

Heeralal Constructions Pvt Limited by its Managing Director, Gopichand ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-06-2017

..... the right to make payment of rs.5,00,00,000/- (rupees five hundred lakhs only) in lieu of the area allotted any time. i am unable to see any rationale behind this agreement. there are no shares to be transferred. there is no building to be allotted. in fact, all they had was a paper and pen and they could .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 13 2017 (HC)

All India Association of Inspectors and Asst. Superintendent Posts, Re ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-13-2017

(prayer: writ petition filed under art.226 of the constitution of india praying for a writ of certiorari calling for the records of the 5th respondent tribunal in its order dated 14.12.2016 made in o.a. 1756 of 2016 quash the same and consequently allow the oa as prayed for.) k.k. sasidharan, j. 1. the action taken by the department of posts, ministry of communications, for the conduct of limited departmental competitive examination for promotion to the post of p.s. group b from the year 2012 onwards by clubbing the year wise vacancies to fill up 19% of the total posts by single examination without giving five physical chances to appear in five different years of examination, made the all india association of inspectors and assistant superintendent of posts, tamil nadu circle, and one of its members, to file original application before the central administrative tribunal. the central administrative tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the tribunal), dismissed the original application taking into account the reply statement filed by the department of posts, indicating the rule position and the practical difficulties to conduct separate examinations, taking into account the limited number of vacancies relating to the earlier years and the delay involved in the selection process. feeling aggrieved, the petitioners are before this court. summary of facts:- 2. the first petitioner is stated to be the all india association of inspectors and assistant superintendent posts, tamil .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 03 2017 (HC)

K. Murugan and Others Vs. Dr. V.K. Marimuthu and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Mar-03-2017

(prayer: second appeal filed under section 100 of the civil procedure code against the judgment and decree dated 27.04.2015, passed in a.s.no.16 of 2014 on the file of the principal district court, theni 2 reversing the judgment and decree dated 18.02.2014 passed in o.s.no.120 of 2011, on the file of the subordinate court, theni.) common judgment 1. the second appeal in s.a.(md)no.358 of 2015 arises against the judgment and decree passed in a.s.no.16 of 2014, on the file of the principal district court, theni, reversing the judgment and decree passed in o.s.no.120 of 2011, on the file of the subordinate court, theni. the first defendant is the appellant and the first respondent is the plaintiff and the respondents 2 to 7 are the defendants 2 to 7 in the suit. the plaintiff filed the suit in o.s.no.120 of 2011 for declaration and permanent injunction. 2. the second appeal in s.a.(md)no.359 of 2015 arises against the judgment and decree passed in a.s.no.17 of 2014, on the file of the principal district court, theni, reversing the judgment and decree passed in o.s.no.148 of 2012, on the file of the subordinate court, theni. the first defendant is the appellant and the first respondent is the plaintiff and the respondents 2 to 10 are the defendants 2 to 10 in the suit. the plaintiff filed the suit in o.s.no.148 of 2012 for declaration in respect of item nos.1 to 4 of the suit property, recovery of possession in respect of item no.1 from the defendants 1 to 4 and in respect of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 24 2017 (HC)

Sri Krishna Educational Trust, Rep. by its Managing Trustee K. Balaram ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Feb-24-2017

(prayer: writ petition filed under section 226 of the constitution of india, praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the information brochure, under graduate admission 2015, the tamil nadu agricultural university dated nil issued by the 4th respondent and quash the same insofar as collecting first year fee as prescribed by tamil nadu government from the candidates admitted during counselling under tnau quota (50 %) in private affiliated colleges and further direct the respondents to permit the petitioner form collecting the first year fee prescribed by tamil nadu govt. from the candidates admitted during counselling under tnau quota (50%).) 1. the petitioner educational trust is running a college, namely, college of agricultural technology at theni, theni district for offering b.sc., (agri) degree course. the present writ petition is filed challenging the information brochure, under graduate admission 2015, issued by the tamil nadu agricultural university, namely, the 4th respondent, only insofar as the clause empowering the university to collect the first year fee from the candidates admitted during the counselling under tamil nadu agricultural university quota (50%) is concerned. consequently, the petitioner also prays for a direction to the respondents to permit them to collect first year fee from such of those candidates. 2. the case of the petitioner, in short, is as follows:- the petitioner educational trust .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2017 (HC)

D. Thangapandi and Others Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Pri ...

Court : Chennai Madurai

Decided on : Feb-02-2017

(prayer: in w.p.(md) no.16217 of 2016 : writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned memorandum of understanding dated 17.04.2015 on the file of the respondent no.2 and quash the same as illegal and consequently for a direction, directing the respondent no.2 to allot 51 fruit shops to the petitioners at the newly constructed wholesale fruit market near mattuthavani, madurai, by following a fair method of allotment within the time period stipulated by this court. prayer in w.p.(md) no.22960 of 2016 : writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in ma.va.3/037969/16 dated 02.11.2016 delivered on 24.11.2016 on the file of the respondent no.2 and quash the same asillegal and consequently for a direction, directing the respondent no.2 to allot 51 fruit shops to the members of the petitioner's society at the newly constructed wholesale fruit market near mattuthavani, madurai, by following a fair method of allotment within the time period stipulated by this court. prayer in w.p.(md) no.16217 of 2016 : writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of mandamus, to direct the respondent nos.1 and 2 to conduct public auction for the allotment of 240 fruit shops at the newly constructed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2017 (HC)

The Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Govt. of India, Mi ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-01-2017

(prayer: this revision is filed under section 379 r/w 401 of criminal procedure code, against the order, dated 18th may 2015 passed in crl.m.p.no.524 of 2014 in e.o.c.c.no.84 of 2001 of the additional chief metropolitan magistrate (economic offences court no.ii), egmore, chennai 600 008.) 1. this petition is directed against the order passed in crl.m.p.no.524 of 2014 in e.o.c.c.no.84 of 2001 on the file of the additional chief metropolitan magistrate (economic offences court no.ii), egmore, chennai, dated 18.05.2015 discharging the respondent from the case. 2. the facts leading to the case are as follows:- the petitioner/complainant preferred a complaint under sections 8(1) and 9(1)(a) of the foreign exchange regulation act 1973, punishable under section 56(1)(i) of the said act r/w sub section 3(3) and (4) of section 49 of the foreign exchange management act, 1999 before the additional chief metropolitan magistrate (e.o.ii), egmore, madras-8 stating that the accused had acquired foreign exchange without previous general or special permission from the reserve bank of india during the year 1994/95 from persons not being authorised dealers in foreign exchange and deposited the amounts in a bank account outside india. 3. the trial court, after considering the evidences adduced on both sides and documents produced on the side of the complainant, passed an order on 18.05.2015 on the application filed by the respondent under section 245(2) cr.p.c. by discharging him stating that .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //