Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rationale Sorted by: recent Court: karnataka Year: 1999 Page 1 of about 37 results (0.007 seconds)

Dec 10 1999 (HC)

P.B. Kumar Vs. P.O., Ii Additional Labour Court and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-10-1999

Reported in : [2000(84)FLR1014]; ILR2000KAR396; (2000)ILLJ1059Kant

..... consequently vitiates the proceedings before the tribunal under sub-section (3) of section 33 of the act and any decision given in these proceedings against the workman concerned.'10. the rationale followed by the apex court in the above decision in respect of a dismissed workman whose dismissal was pending approval before the tribunal under section 33 is that the workman .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 09 1999 (HC)

Sri Ramanjaneyaswami Vidya Saunsthe, Kumbaloor, Honnali Taluk, Shimoga ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-09-1999

Reported in : ILR2000KAR922; 2000(2)KarLJ508

..... raised for the first time usually has. it is indeed not for the first time that the persons aggrieved of the fixation of a cut-off date have questioned its rationale on the touch-stone of article 14 of the constitution. in union of india v p.n. menon and others, a similar argument was advanced by those who fell on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 1999 (HC)

Sonarome Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-30-1999

Reported in : (2000)161CTR(Kar)180; ILR1999KAR4241; [2000]242ITR39(KAR); [2000]242ITR39(Karn)

..... sentence prescribed was only three months which is contrary to the concept of equality. the court observed that the sub-sections operate in different fields and that there is a rationale behind the classification, the equality contemplated under article 14 of the constitution cannot be considered to have been violated. the contention which has been raised is based mainly on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1999 (HC)

Mazgaon Dock Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-29-1999

..... it occurs. a word is not a crystal with a definite and unalterable meaning to be applied mechanically to all and every situations in one and the only way. the rationale for providing for payment of interest has also been explained by this court referring to the principles expounded by cooley in his classic treatise on 'taxation' in sterling's case .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 1999 (HC)

United India Insurance Company Limited, Hubli Vs. Smt. Sangavva Alias ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-21-1999

Reported in : II(2000)ACC342; ILR2000KAR364; 2000(1)KarLJ549

..... was argued no matter on what reason the decision rests or what is the basis of the decision. it is unnecessary to enquire or determine as to what was the rationale of the earlier decision which is said to operate as stare decision'.18. the doctrine is regarded as the rule of policy which only promotes predictability and certainty.19. as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 1999 (HC)

Siddappa and Others Vs. Managing Director, Karnataka State Forest Indu ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-09-1999

Reported in : ILR1999KAR3193; 1999(5)KarLJ647

..... basis of the selection time-scale and the promotion scales being same or similar. mr. prakash, government pleader, appearing for the state, was also at a loss to discover the rationale underlying the classification. in the circumstances, the intended withdrawal of the benefits sounds no more than a ruse. i have therefore no hesitation in holding that denial of benefit to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 09 1999 (HC)

R. Balaji Singh Vs. Hindustan Machine Tools Limited, Watch Factory I a ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-09-1999

Reported in : ILR1999KAR3725; 2000(1)KarLJ447

..... the service in search of greener pastures, i.e., those who resign to better their employment prospects or for other personal reasons. the distinction made is reasonable. it has a rationale nexus to the object sought to be achieved, that is to reward and benefit those who are loyal to the employer and strive for the betterment of the company. on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 08 1999 (HC)

Micro Labs Ltd., Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Assessment) an ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-08-1999

Reported in : (2001)166CTR(Kar)148; [2001]247ITR333(KAR); [2001]247ITR333(Karn); [2001]115TAXMAN27(Kar)

..... that section 64(2)(ii) seeks to discriminate against persons who have been searched, by differentiating them from persons who have not been searched and such differentiation has neither any rationale, nor any nexus to the object sought to be achieved, which is to mobilise resources and channelise funds into priority sectors of the economy and to afford an opportunity to ..... madras v. p. r. sriramulu, air 1996 sc 676, a large discretion in the legislature is recognised by courts in making such laws. it cannot be said that there isno rationale in differentiating between persons who have been searched on the basis of some information regarding concealment of income and persons who have not been searched. to find out whether the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 15 1999 (HC)

Bhimappa @ Bhima Naik Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-15-1999

Reported in : 1999(3)KarLJ520

..... of equality. therefore, we are not able to accede to the contention of the learned counsel for the appellants. it is further contended that there is no nexus or any rationale in the classification. we have already stated, supra, that the report of the joint legislative committee members and the cabinet sub-committee prompted themaking of the rule as the past ..... and weaker section of the people and to improve their socio-economic condition. thus, it cannot be said that rule 12 is arbitrary or without any nexus or without any rationale. therefore, the rule is not in violation of article 14 of the constitution.15. except these points, no other point is urged before us. in view of the above stated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1999 (HC)

C.R. Poorna Pragna Vs. the Chairman, Land Tribunal, Koratagere Taluk, ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-02-1999

Reported in : ILR1999KAR2583; 1999(3)KarLJ591

..... out the possibility that in a small number of cases where genuine errors had occurred that it was not possible to correct those mistakes but one needs to understand the rationale behind imposing the bar insofar as the parties had a good five years time within which if at all any such mistakes had occurred, there was ample scope to rectify .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //