Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rationale Sorted by: recent Court: punjab and haryana Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 23 results (0.024 seconds)

Dec 11 1995 (HC)

Ganpati Udyog and anr. Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-11-1995

Reported in : (1996)113PLR437

..... case where the lower court has refused to admit evidence which ought to have been admitted or the evidence which could not be produced by a party after due diligence. rationale of the order passed by the additional district judge can be discovered from the following observations made by him :-'there is no dispute about the fact that the statement of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 1995 (HC)

United Receland Limited and anr. Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-17-1995

Reported in : (1996)114PLR227

..... respect to the dealers dealing with the export of rice and with respect to the dealers left out of the purview of payment of purchase tax had no nexus or rationale with the object sought to be achieved. it is further contended that the petitioners are not liable to pay interest in any way particularly when their acts have been held .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 1995 (HC)

Bhupinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-07-1995

Reported in : (1995)111PLR387

..... the cinema owners challenged this lumpsum levy of tax in the high court of punjab and haryana. ultimately it was felt that in order to remove the legal lacunae, some rationale system of levy and collection of entertainment tax may be adopted. the pattern of andhra pradesh cinematograph act was found to be the most appropriate with certain modifications as applicable .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 23 1995 (HC)

Balwant Singh Vs. Labour Court and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-23-1995

Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ635P& H; (1995)111PLR298

..... whatsoever for the delay. if the analogy of the statute of limitation can be invoked in proceedings under articles 32 and 226 of the constitution, there appears to be no rationale for the view that the workman shall be entitled to the grant of relief irrespective of the delay and that the labour court shall have no jurisdiction to decline the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 16 1995 (HC)

Rajinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab Through the Secretary to the Govern ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-16-1995

Reported in : (1995)111PLR205

..... patent violation of transfer policy coupled with substantial allegations of mala fides or colourable exercise of power may be enable the court to call upon the government to explain the rationale of transfer and in such case a bald plea that the transfer has been effected in public interest or on administrative ground will not be a sufficient answer. the respondents .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1995 (HC)

Babu Ram Vs. State of Punjab Through Its Collector and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-20-1995

Reported in : (1995)111PLR59

..... to have retired the appellant from service w.e.f. 30.4.1990.10. i am also of the opinion that the learned lower appellate court totally misunderstood the true rationale of the decision of this court in anand parkash v. state of haryana, 1982(2) s.l.r. 368, as well as another decision of this court in rajbir singh .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 1995 (HC)

JaIn Singh and Others Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-18-1995

Reported in : AIR1995P& H243; (1995)109PLR614

..... the land of proprietors for common good and deprive them of their titles in order to vest the same in its manager by the other enactment which is impugned. the rationale of the decisions cited above that management being (is) no acquisition does not violate article 31a.52. in the very nature of things the land cannot be provided to every .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 1995 (HC)

Yakub and anr. Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-06-1995

Reported in : 1996CriLJ2369

s.c. malte, j.1. this appeal is against the conviction and sentence of these two appellants under section 302 read with section 34, i.p.c.2. the prosecution case as spelt out from the record, can be briefly summarised as follows :-appellant 2 ilias was the father of child ayub, the deceased. appellant 1 yakub is the brother of appellant 2. the house of these two appellants are situated adjacent to each other. appellant ilias married pw- 1 akbari. ilias and akbari were blessed with a son tayub. when tayub was 25 days old, appellant 2 ilias turned out akbari from his house. akbari with her child tayub, therefore, came to her parents' house. thereafter efforts were made to bring about cohabitation of the couple. during that period appellant ilias is said to have raised the issue of a dowry of rs. 8,000/-. however, on the persuation by the respectable persons, the couple settled to live in the matrimonial home. thereupon pw-1 akbari started staying with her husband ilias (appellant 2). in the background of these events, tayub was found dead. but that incident had been suppressed by persuading akbari that the matter pertains to the family, and that ilias would properly behave henceforth. after the death of tayub, akbari came to her parents' house. some period elapsed thereafter. then the couple was blessed with a second son ayub whose death in this case has given rise to the present case.3. child ayub was 2 years old when akbari with her child had come to the village of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 1995 (HC)

State of Haryana Vs. Free Wheel (India) Limited

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-05-1995

Reported in : (1996)112PLR729

ashok bhan, j.1. this order shall dispose of sales tax cases 16 and 17, both of 1986, pertaining to the assessment years 1971-72 and 1972-73, as common questions of law and facts are involved in both these cases.2. the facts are taken from s.t.c. 16 of 1986.3. sales tax tribunal, haryana (hereinafter referred to as 'the tribunal') had decided three appeals pertaining to three assessment years 1970-71, 1971-72 and 1972-73, by passing separate orders. state of haryana (hereinafter referred to as 'the petitioner') filed three petitions under section 42(1) of the haryana general sales tax act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'), for referring certain questions of law arising out of the orders of the tribunal of this court for opinion. these petitions were dismissed on 15.10.1985. copies of the orders passed in the three petitions were supplied to the petitioner on 20.11.1985. instead of filing three separate petitions under section 42(2) of the act, for issuing a mandamus directing the tribunals to make a reference to the high court for its opinion, petitioner filed one joint petition i.e. s.t.c. 1 of 1986, for all the three assessment years i.e. 1970-71, 1971-72 and 1972-73.4. respondent-assessee filed an application on 25.7.1986, taking an objection that a joint petition for all the three assessment years was not maintainable and the petitioner should have filed three separate petitions for the three assessment years.5. prior to the final disposal of s.t.c. 1 of 1986, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 1995 (HC)

Shashi Bhushan Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-19-1995

Reported in : (1996)112PLR541

v.k. jhanji, j.1. in this petition, challenge is to decision dated 21.12.1993 (annexure p-8) of respondent no. 2 awarding contract for handling of various foodgrains at the depot of food corporation of india at shahabad. petitioner has also sought a writ in the nature of mandamus directing respondents 1 and 2 to allot contract of handling operations at shahbad markanda by inviting tenders.2. food corporation of india (in short the f.c.i.) is engaged in storing and distributing foodgrains all over the country and for this purpose, maintains storage-depots in which foodgrains are stored. the process of storage involves the handling of various good-grains which are packed in bags transported, dumped, loaded, unloaded and subjected to various other operations of a similar nature in which the employment of labour is essential. for this purpose, contract labour is engaged through a contractor at every such depot. f.c.i. for the purpose of carrying out the task of storing food-grains; floats tenders from time to time as per the policy governing the subject in order to award contract to the most economical and deserving contractor for each depot. according to the petitioner, as per the policy followed in the past by the f.c.i., tenders are required to be called through public advertisement directly from contractors. at the time the tenders are floated, the rates in accordance with 'scheduled rate' prepared by f.c.i. are quoted in the tender and thee parties who submit the tenders, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //