Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rationale Sorted by: recent Court: supreme court of india Year: 1999 Page 1 of about 78 results (0.080 seconds)

Dec 17 1999 (SC)

Kishori Vs. State (Nct) of Delhi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-17-1999

Reported in : AIR2000SC562; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)85; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)426; 2000(1)ALT(Cri)132; 2000CriLJ756; JT1999(10)SC275; 2000(1)SCALE1; (2000)2SCC83; [1999]Supp5SCR494

..... that the high ideals of the constitution have to be borne in mind, but when normal life breaks down and groups of people go berserk losing balance of mind, the rationale that the ideals of the constitution should be upheld or followed, may not appeal to them in such circumstances, nor can we expect such loose heterogeneous group of persons like .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 1999 (SC)

State of Maharashtra Vs. Suresh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-10-1999

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD(Cri)606; JT1999(9)SC513; 1999(7)SCALE386; (2000)1SCC471; [1999]Supp5SCR215; 2000(1)LC326(SC)

..... . unless it is suggested that there was another alternative and safer route for the culprit to take the girl unnoticed by any shopkeeper or even a pedestrian there in no rationale in the reasoning that there is 'inherent incredibility' in the version that respondent would have taken the girl through this route.20. the last reasoning of the division bench is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 1999 (SC)

ishwar Dass JaIn (Dead) Thr. Lrs. Vs. Sohan Lal (Dead) by Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-29-1999

Reported in : AIR2000SC426; 2000(1)CTC359; JT1999(9)SC305; (2000)125PLR56; RLW2000(1)SC80; 1999(7)SCALE277; (2000)1SCC434; [1999]Supp5SCR24; 2000(1)LC666(SC)

..... material whole. loose sheets of paper or scraps of paper cannot be termed as 'book' for they can be easily detached and replaced. it has also been held that the rationale behind admissibility of parties' books of account as evidence is that the regularity of habit, the difficulty of falsification and the fair certainty of ultimate detection give them in a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 1999 (SC)

Sukhar Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-01-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC3883; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)899; (2000)1CALLT52(SC); 2000CriLJ29; 1999(3)Crimes191(SC); JT1999(7)SC537; 1999(6)SCALE280; (1999)9SCC507

..... 'as to form part of the same transaction' becomes relevant by itself. this rule is, roughly speaking, an exception to the general rule that hearsay evidence is not admissible. the rationale in making certain statement or fact admissible under section 6 of the evidence act is on account of the spontaneity and immediacy of such statement or fact in relation to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 1999 (SC)

Ashwani Kumar and anr. Vs. Regional Transport Authority Bikaner and An ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-28-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC3888; 2000(1)ALLMR(SC)96; JT1999(7)SC609; (2000)1MLJ125(SC); (2000)124PLR287; RLW2000(1)SC1; 1999(6)SCALE219; (1999)8SCC364; [1999]Supp3SCR211

..... the submissions made on behalf of the appellants would result in frustration of the objective sought to be achieved by the act. the interpretation put by the high court is rationale, legal and proper. in the absence of existence of inter-state route, the authorities under the act were not justified in granting the permits to the appellants. the existence of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 17 1999 (SC)

Gurdeep Singh @ Deep Vs. the State (Delhi Admn.)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-17-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC3646; 1999(2)ALD(Cri)922; 1999CriLJ4573; 1999(3)Crimes243(SC); JT1999(7)SC191; 1999(6)SCALE20; (2000)1SCC498; [1999]Supp2SCR693

..... constitute the offence. conviction of 'confession' is based on the maxim 'habemus optimum- testem, confidante reum' which means that confession of an accused is the best evidence against him. the rationale behind this rule is that an ordinary, normal and sane person would not make a statement which would incriminate him unless urged by the prompting of truth and conscience.under .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 1999 (SC)

Shamnsaheb M. Multtani Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-14-1999

Reported in : 2001ALLMR(Cri)997(SC); (2001)2SCC577

..... of this court (m.k. mukherjee and s.p. kurdukar, jj.) has held in sangaraboina sreenu v. state of a.p.2 that it is impermissible to do so. the rationale advanced by the bench for the above position is this:(scc p. 348, para 2) it is true that section 222 crpc entitles a court to convict a person of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 11 1999 (SC)

T. Hamza Vs. the State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-11-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC2966; 1999CriLJ4059; 1999(66)ECC322; 1999LC17(SC); JT1999(5)SC616; 1999(3)KLT122(SC); RLW1999(2)SC342; 1999(4)SCALE640; (2000)1SCC300; [1999]Supp1SCR343

..... consequences that may entail the possession of illicit articles under the ndps act. it appears to have been incorporated in the act keeping in view the severity of the punishment. the rationale behind the provision is even otherwise manifest. the search before a gazetted officer or a magistrate would impart much more authenticity and credit-worthiness to the search and seizure proceeding .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 1999 (SC)

Dr. Preeti Srivastava and anr. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-10-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC2894a; [1999]Supp1SCR249

..... in the qualifying marks between the reserved category and the general category is smaller, 35% for the reserved category and 45% for the general category. we see no logic or rationale for the difference to be larger at the post-graduate level.standard of education:32. a large differentiation in the qualifying marks between the two groups of students would make .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 10 1999 (SC)

Dr Preeti Srivastava and anr. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-10-1999

Reported in : AIR1999SC2894; JT1999(5)SC498; 1999(4)SCALE579; (1999)7SCC120

..... in the qualifying marks between the reserved category and the general category is smaller, 35% for the reserved category and 45% for the general category. we see no logic or rationale for the difference to be larger at the post-graduate level.standard of education:31. a large differentiation in the qualifying marks between the two groups of students would make .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //