Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rationale Year: 1956 Page 1 of about 76 results (0.006 seconds)

Dec 12 1956 (HC)

Kora Lukose Vs. Chacko Uthuppan

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Dec-12-1956

Reported in : AIR1957Ker19

..... under section 70 should be considered as based not on contract not on quasi-contract, a term which covers a wide area including claims on a quantum meruit. 6. the rationale of quasi-contract according to lord mansfield, is the necessity of restoring benefits unjustly obtained -- moses v. macferlan, (1760) 2 burr 1005 (a) -- and according to lord sumner the existence ..... now recognised to fall within a third category of common law which has been called quasi-con tract or restitution.' 8. it should be clear from the above that the rationale of quasi-contract is still a matter of speculation, in english law and all that cheshire and fifoot are prepared to say in concluding their discussion of quasi-contract is .....

Tag this Judgment!

1956

Grunewald Vs. U.S.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1956

..... at a prior trial? '5. does not the doctrine and rationale of slochower v. board of higher education [ 350 u.s. 551 ], decided by this court april 9, 1956, compel the conclusion that a defendant under the circumstances aforesaid, is denied ..... preceding paragraph, does not the court's instruction as aforesaid illegally impeach and impede the defendant's statutory right to be a witness on his own behalf? '4. does the rationale of raffel v. united states, 271 u.s. 494 [46 s. ct. 566], apply to prior invocation of the fifth amendment before a grand jury as distinguished from such action .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 1956 (FN)

Nlrb Vs. Babcock and Wilcox Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-30-1956

..... of the union and nonemployee union solicitors would be a differentiation not only without substance, but in clear defiance of the rationale given by the board and the courts for permitting solicitation. this conclusion is based on the belief that the rationale enunciated by the supreme court in the letourneau case, supra, is equally applicable in the case of solicitation by union .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 1956 (FN)

Leslie Miller, Inc. Vs. Arkansas

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Dec-17-1956

..... review over the federal determination of "responsibility," and would thus frustrate the expressed federal policy of selecting the lowest responsible bidder. in view of the federal statute and regulations, the rationale of johnson v. maryland, 254 u. s. 51 , 254 u. s. 57 , is applicable: "it seems to us that the immunity of the instruments of the united states from state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 1956 (FN)

Jay Vs. Boyd

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-11-1956

..... regulations governing suspension procedures so as to give effect, if possible, to all of its provisions. cf. lawson v. suwannee fruit & s.s co., 336 u. s. 198 . this same rationale leads us to conclude that the requirement of a decision containing "reasons" is fully complied with by a statement to the effect that the application has been denied on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 1956 (FN)

Sears, Roebuck and Co. Vs. Mackey

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-11-1956

..... of a litigation, no matter what its nature, must be completed before any appeal is allowed, see collins v. miller, 252 u. s. 364 , 252 u. s. 370 , the underlying rationale of the principle has been respected when not susceptible of this mechanical way of putting it. what have been called exceptions are not exceptions at all in the sense of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 1956 (FN)

Kinsella Vs. Kreuger

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-11-1956

..... of my views. * [note: this reservation applies also to reid v. covert, post, p. 351 u. s. 487 .] * see the opinion, in 1855, of attorney general caleb cushing: "the legal rationale of the treaty stipulations as to china, with which we are now chiefly concerned, and their relation to the legislative authority of the united states are explained in a dispatch .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 1956 (FN)

Reed Vs. Pennsylvania R. Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-11-1956

..... is not a juristic requirement that decisions be carried to their logical consequences. it is equally true that capricious distinctions should not be made. yet they are invited when the rationale of a decision is left, if not cloudy, certainly unlimited. for myself, i do not see how the clerical employee here "furthers" the business of the pennsylvania any more than .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 1956 (FN)

Putnam Vs. Commissioner

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Dec-03-1956

..... , 216 f.2d 794; [ footnote 2/5 ] cudlip v. commissioner, 220 f.2d 565; [ footnote 2/6 ] see also ansley v. commissioner, 217 f.2d 252. [ footnote 2/7 ] the rationale of these four courts of appeals is, in my opinion, more convincing than that of the commissioner, and i think this court should have approved and followed it here by .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 04 1956 (FN)

Durley Vs. Mayo

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-04-1956

..... perjured, but he did not present this as a federal question. the 1952 petition did not mention the perjured testimony issue. [ footnote 2/2 ] the florida supreme court stated the rationale of these decisions as follows: "it is elementary that a writ of habeas corpus cannot be used as a substitute for appeal, motion to quash or a motion in arrest .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //