Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rationale Year: 1981 Page 5 of about 298 results (0.010 seconds)

Jan 13 1981 (FN)

Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. Vs. Risjord

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-13-1981

..... . s. 860 (1978). by way of contrast, we have generally denied review of pretrial discovery orders, see, e.g., united states v. ryan, supra; cobbledick v. united states, supra. our rationale has been that, in the rare case when appeal after final judgment will not cure an erroneous discovery order, a party may defy the order, permit a contempt citation to ..... to avoid waste of judicial resources); melamed ii, 592 f.2d at 295 (earlier ruling in melamed i established appealability as law of the case). to the extent that the rationales of those cases would allow a court to agree to decide the merits of a case over which it is without jurisdiction, we respectfully disagree. justice rehnquist, with whom the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 1981 (FN)

Upjohn Co. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-13-1981

..... states, 425 u. s. 391 , 425 u. s. 403 (1976), we recognized the purpose of the privilege to be "to encourage clients to make full disclosure to their attorneys." this rationale for the privilege has long been recognized by the court, see hunt v. blackburn, 128 u. s. 464 , 128 u. s. 470 (1888) (privilege "is founded upon the necessity, in .....

Tag this Judgment!

1981

Graddick Vs. Newman

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1981

..... court has decided to deny a stay. had this result been communicated without explanation, the parties might well have been left with the impression that the full court adopted the rationale of justice powell's opinion accompanying his denial of the original application, i. e. , that applicant lacks standing to seek a stay. i write separately to emphasize my view that .....

Tag this Judgment!

1981

Florida Vs. Garrett

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-01-1981

..... rule, in fact, had been repealed prior to the appeal of respondent's conviction, and his reliance on it in earlier competency hearings had proved consistently unavailing. [ footnote 4 ] the rationale of a court's decision usually is to be gleaned from the explanation given by the court. in this case, the explanation rests entirely on an erroneous interpretation of a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 1981 (HC)

State of U.P. Vs. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-09-1981

Reported in : AIR1981All314

..... of law and, therefore, beyond courts' purview the learned counsel for the respondent contested the submissions made by the learned senior standing counsel on merits. first he gave us the rationale behind clause 1.11 of the contract in order to show that the interpretation given by the arbitrators was not at all perverse and was based on sound reasoning and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 14 1981 (HC)

Smt. Kaushalya Devi Vs. Housing and Development Board and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-14-1981

Reported in : [1983]53CompCas676(All)

..... case the payment of these amounts has been accelerated. it is not understood how the payment of the amounts has been accelerated' and even if that be so on what rationale could the same be deducted from the amount of compensation payable to the claimant. as we have already seen above, it is only a like which could be deducted from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 23 1981 (HC)

indo Swiss Time Limited Vs. Umrao and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-23-1981

Reported in : AIR1981P&H213

..... not commend itself to me. when judgments of the superior court are of co-equal benches and therefore of matching authority then their weight inevitably must be considered by the rationale and the logic thereof and not by the mere fortuitous circumstances of the time and date on which they were rendered. it is manifest that when two directly conflicting judgments .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 26 1981 (HC)

Pritam Singh Gill Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-26-1981

Reported in : AIR1982P& H228

..... applicability and the nature, scope and the authorities to whom a writ of certiorari would issue did not even remotely come in for consideration. i must, therefore, hold that the rationale for the undermentioned observations of the learned single judge in t. gattaiah's case (1981 lab ic 942) (andh pra) (supra), in my humble view, are wholly unsustainable:--'...................... all in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 04 1981 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Khem Chand Bahadur Chand

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jun-04-1981

Reported in : [1981]131ITR336(P& H)

..... by parliament of the compendious phrase 'in the nature of entertainment expenditure'. a close analysis of the judgment would show that this aspect is conspicuous by its absence. consequently, the rationale and the conclusions of the judgment seem to have been warped because of its ignoring the specific words of the statute which, in a way, are the very key to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 09 1981 (SC)

Laxmi Khandsari and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-09-1981

Reported in : AIR1981SC873; 1981(1)SCALE455; (1981)2SCC600; [1981]3SCR92

..... to insist on observance of natural justice in the area of administrative decision-making so as to avoid the devaluation of this principle by administrators already alarmingly insensitive to the rationale of audi alteram partern!66. strong reliance was also placed on the observations of this court in maneka gandhi v. u. o. i. : [1978]2scr621 where bhagwati, j., after full .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //