Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: rationale Year: 1999 Page 15 of about 477 results (0.008 seconds)

Sep 15 1999 (HC)

New Vijay Agency Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-15-1999

Reported in : [2001]74ITD504(Mad)

..... ) and, is a rule of evidence. presumptions which are rebuttable in nature available to be drawn. the initial burden of discharging the onus of rebuttal is on the assessee. the rationale behind this view is that the basic facts are within the special knowledge of the assessee. section 106 of the indian evidence act, 1872, gives statutory recognition to this universally .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 07 1999 (HC)

Hydel Construction Ltd. Vs. H.P. State Electricity Board

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-07-1999

Reported in : AIR2000HP19

..... outside the award or outside whatever may be said about it in the award. the ambiguity of the award can, in such cases, be resolved by admitting extrinsic evidence. the rationale of this rule is that the nature of the dispute is something which has to be determined outside and independent of what appears in the award. such jurisdictional error needs .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 1999 (HC)

Ashik Abbas and Others Vs. Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delh ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-29-1999

Reported in : 80(1999)DLT810; ILR1999Delhi151

ordera.k. sikari, j.1. all these writ petitions involve common question of facts and law and were heard together. these petitions are disposed of by this common judgment. 2. since the question to be decided in these writ petitions is based on almost identical facts, for the purpose of convenience, facts of cwp.no.3464/98 are mentioned here: 3. the petitioners are holders of diploma in basic training (dbt), which they have done from jamia millia inslamia (jmi) university. it is the case of the petitioners, that dbt was considered at par with elementary training education training course (ete) being run by govt. of nct of delhi/respondent no.1 for direct appointments as primary school teachers up to 1995. these diploma holders used to be considered for appointment as primary teachers in schools run by municipal corporation of delhi (mcd)/respondent no.2. even in 1996, the candidates who had done dbt done jmi were given equal chance to apply along with those who had done etc from district institutes of education training (diet) which is being run by state council of educational research and training (scert). national council of teachers education (ncte) vide order dated 18.6.97, a statutory body of the government of india under national council for technical education under section 14(3)(a) of the ncte act, 1993 granted recognition of 'elementary (diploma in basic training) teacher education course', in exercise of the authority vested in the said council under section 14(3)(a) .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 19 1999 (HC)

M. Sreenivasulu Reddy and ors. Vs. Kishore R. Chhabria and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-19-1999

Reported in : [2002]109CompCas18(Bom)

..... endowed with the powers to take the necessary decision. having arrived at its prima facie opinion, not once but thrice, the civil court was not expected to go into the rationale behind the same and substitute its own opinion for that of the appropriate authority as also observed by a constitution bench in life insurance corporation of india v. escorts ltd .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 1999 (HC)

United India Insurance Company Limited, Hubli Vs. Smt. Sangavva Alias ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-21-1999

Reported in : II(2000)ACC342; ILR2000KAR364; 2000(1)KarLJ549

..... was argued no matter on what reason the decision rests or what is the basis of the decision. it is unnecessary to enquire or determine as to what was the rationale of the earlier decision which is said to operate as stare decision'.18. the doctrine is regarded as the rule of policy which only promotes predictability and certainty.19. as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 1999 (HC)

Siddappa and Others Vs. Managing Director, Karnataka State Forest Indu ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-09-1999

Reported in : ILR1999KAR3193; 1999(5)KarLJ647

..... basis of the selection time-scale and the promotion scales being same or similar. mr. prakash, government pleader, appearing for the state, was also at a loss to discover the rationale underlying the classification. in the circumstances, the intended withdrawal of the benefits sounds no more than a ruse. i have therefore no hesitation in holding that denial of benefit to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 30 1999 (HC)

Sonarome Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-30-1999

Reported in : (2000)161CTR(Kar)180; ILR1999KAR4241; [2000]242ITR39(KAR); [2000]242ITR39(Karn)

..... sentence prescribed was only three months which is contrary to the concept of equality. the court observed that the sub-sections operate in different fields and that there is a rationale behind the classification, the equality contemplated under article 14 of the constitution cannot be considered to have been violated. the contention which has been raised is based mainly on the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 22 1999 (HC)

A. Amarender Rao and Others Vs. A.P.S.E.B., Hyderabad and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jan-22-1999

Reported in : 1999(1)ALD638; 1999(1)ALT746

..... reclassify the category of agriculturists and fix different rates taking the capacity of the motor which they installed as basis. in other words, their contention is that there is no rationale behind making a reclassifieation among the class of agriculturists for fixing different rates and the decision of the board is, therefore, violativc of article 14 of the constitution. it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 1999 (HC)

institute of Chartered Financial Analysts of India Vs. Council of the ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-29-1999

Reported in : [2000]111TAXMAN665(AP)

..... appellants, strenuously contended that the action of the 1st respondent is arbitrary and discriminatory, as, there is no nexus with the object to be achieved and that there is no rationale in the approach of the 1st respondent. he also contended that the impugned notification is violative of the fundamental right guaranteed under article 19(1)(g). on the other hand .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1999 (HC)

Nisha A. Shenai Vs. Ntr University of Health Sciences and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-30-1999

Reported in : 1999(3)ALD52; 1999(2)ALT776

..... is one of the eligibility criteria to take p.o. examinations but 85% attendance has to be calculated with reference to the whole period of training. this rule has a rationale behind it. in any training, more so in a course of specialisation, the optimum benefit caff be derived by the students only when they undergo the training regularly and punctually .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //