Court : DRAT Delhi
Decided on : Dec-04-2001
..... court in j.u. mansukhani & company and anr. v. presiding officer and ors., air 2000 delhi 103.3. under the aforesaid clause (d), the plaint is to be rejected if the suit appears from the statement in the plaint to be barred by law. at that stage, the contested facts stated by the defendant in the application under order vii rule 11 are ..... be barred by any law; 2. the appellants appear to rely on clause (d) of the aforesaid rule according to which, the plaint shall be rejected where the suit appears from the statement in the plaint to be barred by any law. learned counsel for the appellant says that the claim of the respondent bank is not covered within the definition of "debt ..... .the impugned order has been passed on an application moved by the appellants under order vii rule 11 of the cpc saying that the recovery application of the respondent bank is barred by law. i have perused order vii rule 11 of cpc, which reads as follows : (b) where the relief claimed is undervalued, and the plaintiff, on being required by the ..... court to correct the valuation within a time to be fixed by the court, fails to do so; (c) where the relief claimed is properly valued, but the plaint is written upon paper insufficiently stamped .....Tag this Judgment!