Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare schemes act no 31 of 1978 Page 1 of about 170 results (0.071 seconds)

Feb 13 2012 (HC)

S.Prabhakar Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... in w.p.no.15901 of 1994 for certiorari by rightly challenging ..... sought to be acquired including the lands of the petitioners.(c) since the government had already enacted a special act that the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare schemes act, 1978 (act no.xxxi of 1978) for acquisition of lands for the harijan welfare, the said land acquisition proceedings initiated by the respondents 1 to 3 as illegal and contrary to the provisions of the special provisions of land acquisition act, 1894 to acquire lands for harijan welfare. therefore, the petitioners filed a writ petition .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2006 (HC)

N. Vasanthi Vs. the District Collector and

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2006)1MLJ472

..... /95/a in form-iii under rule 5( i) of the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare scheme rules, 1979 and quash the same.2. brief facts of the case are as follows:(a) the land, which is the subject matter of the acquisition proceedings under the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare schemes act, 1978 (act no.xxxi of 1978) (hereinafter referred to as ' the act'), originally belonged to the petitioner's father shri.p.madana gurusamy, which ..... was purchased by him in the year 1989. it is stated that the petitioner's father was in possession and enjoyment of the land by cultivating paddy, cotton and other plantation crops ..... of act 31 of 1978, the proceedings initiated under the central act shall continue. section 22 of the act 31 of 1978 provides as follows: 'section 22: application of the act to certain pending cases of acquisition:(1) the provisions of this act shall apply also to any case or cases in which proceedings have been started before the commencement of this act for the acquisition of any land for the harijan welfare scheme under the land acquisition act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 27 2006 (HC)

A. Doulath Nisha Vs. the District Collector and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2006)1MLJ552

..... notice under form i, rule 3(i) was served on the petitioner and that she had filed her objections.6. section 4(2) of the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare schemes act, 1978 (act no.xxxi of 1978) clearly states as follows:4.power to acquire land-- (1)...(2) before publishing a notice under sub-section (1), the district collector or any officer authorised by the district collector in his behalf ..... show cause why it should not be acquired.7. in view of the above, since no notice has been issued to the petitioner as contemplated under section 4(2) of the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare schemes act, 1978 (act no.xxxi of 1978), the land acquisition proceedings for acquiring the land become invalid. in this regard, following judgments of this court affirm the view that notice to the owner is mandatory.(i) s ..... .p. vedanayagam v. secretary, government of tamil nadu, chennai : (1996)imlj432 ;(ii) smt. pushpa bai baisingh v. district collector tirunelveli .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 2013 (HC)

K.Murugananthan Vs. District Collector of Namakkal District

Court : Chennai

..... ).a notification in roc.no.34994/2011 d1, dated 18.4.2013 under section 4(1) of the tamil nadu act 31 of 1978 was published in namakkal district gazette, dated 9.5 ..... land in s.no.7/3b2, 68, vattur village, tiruchengode taluk, namakkal district. for petitioners : mr.m.s.palanisamy for mr.v.ravichandran for respondents : mrs.m.e.raniselvam, agp - - - - order the petitioners are owners of dry lands in s.no.7/3b2, 68, vattur village, tiruchengode taluk, namakkal district. 2.the lands of the petitioners were acquired under the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare schemes act, 1978 (for short tamil nadu act 31 of 1978 ..... reveals that after satisfaction of the firs.respondent, the acquisition was ordered by him. 19.the proceedings dated 18.4.2013 of the firs.respondent also states that the lands were acquired for tamil nadu harijan welfare scheme. therefore, the aforesaid sentences from the impugned notification shall be understood as the lands were acquired for tamil nadu harijan welfare scheme. hence this submission also has no substance. 20.for all these reasons, the writ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 10 2012 (HC)

Gowrappan and ors. Vs. Santhosh Babu and ors.

Court : Chennai

..... 26.9.1995 to as many as 224 beneficiaries. the land was acquired under the central enactment/ land acquisition act,1894. 5. the constitutional validity of the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare schemes act, 1978 (tamil nadu act no.31 of 1978) was challenged in the madras high court by various land owners and the madras high court declared act no.31 of 1978 as unconstitutional and struck down the said act. aggrieved by the same, government preferred s.l.p. before ..... . though the state act had been struck down by this court, that judgment of this high court was reversed by the supreme court. while so doing ..... judgment of the supreme court. as the award was passed on 31.3.1995 after the judgment of the supreme court, by the order dated 17.7.2003, impugned notification was quashed and writ petition was allowed holding as under: ...... the special enactment, for that purpose being the tamil nadu acquisition of lands for harijan welfare act (tamil nadu act 31 of 1978), was questioned by way of writ petition before this court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 05 1999 (HC)

S. Sannasi, and Two Others Vs. the District Collector, Pudukkottai and ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1999(3)CTC293

..... and the same, they are being disposed of by the following common order. aggrieved by the acquisition proceedings initiated by the respondents under the provisions of tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare schemes act, 1978 (tamil nadu act xxxi of 1978), the petitioners have filed the above writ petitions.2. the case of the petitioner in w.p. no. 8360 of 1997 is briefly stated hereunder: the first petitioner sannasi is the owner of ..... an extent of 0.39.0 ars in s.no. 261/2 in kodikulam village, the second petitioner ..... it is only an administrative instruction to the collectors. it is also not disputed that there is no such prohibition either in the act ( xxxi of 1978) or in the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare schemes rules, 1979. even though no counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents in w.p.no. 8360 of 1997, on the basis of the records, the learned government advocate would contend that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 17 1995 (HC)

K. Arunachalam and ors. Vs. the District Collector and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1996)1MLJ63

..... ) dated 25.9.1995 by the office of the special tahsildar, adi dravidar welfare, sankari, runs thus:ref: this office award no. 8/80-81 dated 28.3.1981.please take notice that the lands noted below have been acquired by government under the provisions of the tamil nadu acquisition of lands for harijan welfare schemes act, 1978 (tamil nadu act no. 31 of 1978), for the purpose of provision of house sites to the arunthathiars of thattankuttai ..... . no. 8173 of 1981, which was filed by the vendor of the present petitioners in w.p. no. 13830 of 1995, allowed the writ petition observing as follows:the provisions of the tamil nadu act 31 of 1978 (the tamil nadu acquisition of lands for harijan welfare schemes act) have been struck down by a bench of this court in ananthi ammal ..... additional government pleader takes notice. a bench of this court has struck down the provisions of the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare schemes act, 1978 (act 31 of 1978) in anandhi ammal v. collector of tirunelveli and etc. w.p. no. 797 of 1980 and connected writ petitions. in the circumstances, the writ petitions are allowed. no costs.5. likewise, this court by order dated 18.9.1981 in w.p .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 26 1997 (HC)

K. Ramachandran and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Represented by the Se ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1998)1MLJ112

..... state, till this date no award has been passed. as laid down by the apex court and followed in a number of decisions of this court, the acquisition in questioned cannot be continued under the central act as the acquisition in question is only for the purpose of harijan welfare scheme, and the acquisition has to be undertaken only under the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare scheme act (31 of 1978). the division bench of ..... and on the facts of this case the impugned proceeding are quashed and the writ petition is allowed. no costs, it is well open to the respondents to proceed afresh under the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare scheme act (31 of 1978).4. in view of the order passed in the main writ petition, no separate orders are necessary in the connected w.m. ps and they are closed. ..... this court in wa 114 of 1995 has held thus:a division bench of this court, consisting of the honourable chief justice and raju,j. in writ appeal no. 1987 of 1995 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 29 1996 (HC)

U.R. Narayanasamy Vs. the District Collector and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1997)1MLJ194

..... the writ petition no. j 769 of 1996 and w.m.p. nos. 2724 and 2725 of 1996. in. the writ petition, the petitioner sought for quashing the acquisition proceedings initiated and completed under the provisions of the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare schemes act xxxi of 1978 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act') the acquisition proceeding was initiated ..... also came to be finalised by passing the award on 20th march 1981, in award no. 5/81-a ..... by publication of the notification under section 4(1) of the act on 20.5.1990. the acquisition ..... also to cases in which proceedings have been started before the commencement of the said act under the land acquisition act for the purposes of harijan welfare scheme, provided that no awards have been made under the land acquisition act. we see no unreasonableness in this provision, particularly having regard to the terms of section 20. we must, however .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 25 1988 (HC)

P. Annamalai Vs. the Collector of Ramanathapuram and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1988)2MLJ398

..... be guilty of a grave sin'--harijan, 30-2-2937, p.408.21. the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare schemes act, 1978 (31 of 1978) was enacted by the legislature of the state of tamil nadu in the twenty-ninth year of the republic of india, and it was extended to the whole of the state of tamil nadu, section 3(f) of the tamil nadu acquisition of land for harijan welfare schemes act, 1978 defines'harijans' as members of the scheduled castes ..... of harijan welfare department, that the social welfare department is competent enough to issue the government order and that the ruling in writ petition no. 4579 of 1978 cannot be considered to be a good law.9. the points that arise for consideration in these two writ petitions are:(1) whether the acquisition of land for adidravidas without following the procedure prescribed under rule 3(b) of tamil nadu land acquisition ..... are the creatures of that creator. and this is not a philosophical thing to be dished out to brahmanas or kshatriyas, but it enunciates an eternal truth which admits of no reduction, no palliation. and if that is so, how can anyone here dare to arrogate superiority to himself or herself over any other human being? i tell you, therefore, that if .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //