Court : Chennai
..... shall be deemed to have come into force on 7th day of september, 2010. as per section 5 of the act, preferential basis appointments to persons studied in tamil medium under ..... qualification prescribed for direct recruitment through tamil medium instruction. in the said act, it is also made clear that it ..... in madurai law college in tamil medium and she had also written the examinations in tamil and she is eligible and entitled to get the benefit of preferential right as per act 40 of 2010, namely, the tamil nadu appointment on preferential basis in the services under the state of persons studied in tamil medium act, 2010. the said act provides preference in appointment in the services under the state to persons who have obtained the educational .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Chennai
..... certificate verification. but, the petitioners have not been selected. the grievance of the petitioners is that since they studied p.g. degree as well as b.ed. course in tamil medium, they should have been given preference, as per the ".tamil nadu appointment on preferential basis in the services under the state of persons studied in tamil medium act, 2010". (hereinafter referred to as ".the act".). but, the petitioner have not been given the benefit of the said ..... per section 2(d) of the act, they are the persons who studied in tamil medium and thus, they are ..... act. therefore, they are before this court with these writ petitions. 3.it is contended by the petitioners that as .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Chennai
..... provisional list published by the third respondent on 15.11.2015, quash the same and consequently direct the respondents 1 to 4 to implement tamil medium reservation in proper perspective as contemplated under the tamil nadu appointment on preferential basis in the services under the state of persons studied in tamil medium act, 2010 while filling up the post of sub-inspector as per the recruitment notification no. 1/205 issued by the 3rd respondent on 08 ..... .02.2015.) pushpa sathyanarayana, j. 1. the petitioners, claiming to be applicants pursuant to notification dated 08.02.2015 issued by the tamil nadu uniformed services recruitment board for ..... the post of sub-inspector of police (taluk), have invoked article 226 of the constitution of india challenging the provisional list published by the board and seek a direction to the respondents to implement tamil medium reservation in proper perspective as contemplated under the tamil nadu appointment on preferential basis. 2. six petitioners have joined together and .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Chennai
..... respective communal categories is in violation of clause 3 of annexure ii of rule 5 of the tamil nadu state judicial service (cadre and recruitment) rules, 2007 and section 2 (d) of appointment on preferential basis in the services under the state of persons studied in tamil medium act, 2010 and also against the notification no.5 of 2014 issued by tnpsc. 25. it is further submitted by the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner ..... that the act of tnpsc in the matter of selection in the above manner virtually amounts to treating the pstm ..... that vide tamil nadu ordinance no.3 of 2010 made in g.o. ms. no.145 dated 30.9.2010, pstm category was created. by the said g.o., a special reservation was carved out for persons, who had studied in tamil medium. by the said g.o., 20% of all the vacancies in the appointment in the services under the state was set apart on preferential basis to the persons, who had studied in tamil medium. as .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Chennai Madurai
..... no.40 of 2010. 2. g.o.ms.no.145, personnel and administrative reforms (s) department, dated ..... 30.09.2010. 3. from the secretary, tamil nadu public service commission, letter no.4422/rnd-02/2000, dated ..... tamil medium rules, 2010, has been substituted, vide g.o.ms.no.40, personnel and administrative reforms (s) department, dated 30.04.2014 and the said government order is extracted hereunder: government of tamil nadu abstract tamil nadu appointment on preferential basis in the services under the state of persons studied in tamil medium rules, 2010 amendment to rule 3 issued. personnel and administrative reforms(s) department g.o.ms.no.40 dated: 30.04.2014 ( tamil ?) read: 1. tamil nadu act .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Chennai
..... which are to be filled through direct recruitment shall be set apart on preferential basis to persons studied in tamil medium as illustrated below ..... , rule-3 speaks of manner of selection for appointment, which reads as follows: ?.3.manner of selection for appointment: twenty percent of all vacancies in the appointment in the services under the state ..... all posts and government services for the candidates who were studied in tamil medium. with a view to give effect to the said ordinance, which was later on substituted by an act, the government, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 8 of the said ordinance, issued rules under the name ?.tamil nadu appointment on preferential basis in the services under the state of persons studied in tamil medium rules, 2010?.in the rules .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Chennai
..... respondent viz., the secretary, tnpsc to appoint him as assistant public prosecutor grade ii in the tamil nadu general service 2010-2011 through direct recruitment duly called for in notification no.6 of 2012 dated 02.04.2012 under preferential basis for having studied in tamil medium. this respondent university has no relevant records to authenticate the petitioner's study in tamil medium as defined under the act of 2010.". 7.from the averments made in the ..... law degree course, in the year 2006, and he had enrolled himself as an advocate, in the bar council of tamil nadu, on 1.11.2006. he had further ..... writ of mandamus, to direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner, as assistant public prosecutor grade ii, in the tamil nadu general service 2010-2011, by direct recruitment, based on the notification no.6 of 2012, dated 2.4.2012, under the preferential allotment to persons who had studied in tamil medium.2. the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had stated that the petitioner had completed his 3 year .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Chennai
..... all government posts were to be filled up on a preferential basis by persons who studied in tamil medium. subsequently, the said ordinances was replaced by an act, namely, act 4 of 2010, whereby the state government reiterated its policy decision, as a result, the persons, who studied in tamil medium, are entitled to 20% reservation of the posts in the government services after the year 2010. in this regard, it is relevant to extract the ..... virtue of g.o.ms.no.145, dated 30.09.2010, followed by clarificatory letter dated 30.12.2011 issued by the government clarifying 20% reservation to each communal category on preferential basis to the persons studied in tamil medium, the fourth respondent and the above said other candidates have been rightly appointed under the pstm category on the basis of marks obtained by them in the written test as ..... respondent has been selected under the category of pstm, hence, he contended, the appointment of the fourth respondent on preferential basis cannot be questioned, as it is perfectly in order. with these submissions, he prayed for dismissal of the writ petition.9. heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this court.10. the tamil nadu public service commission (tnpsc), vide .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Chandigarh
..... in his case. 8. learned counsel for the respondents cited workmen of nilgiri coop. marketing society limited vs. state of tamil nadu and ors. in civil appeal no.1351-53 of 2002, decided on 05.02.2004, wherein the apex ..... outsourcing basis through service provider. the applicant had not been able to show any appointment letter regarding appointment in the respondent department and there was no master servant relationship between the respondent department and the applicant. learned counsel stated that ..... to short list candidates after considering number of applications and qualifications possessed by each candidates, the commission applied preferential criteria of short listing the candidates to be called for interview action of the selection cannot be said ..... regard, the comptroller and auditor general of india had issued circular no.22-nge/2010 dated 27.08.2010 (annexure r-2), wherein the operative part reads as under:- 2. the following weightage in prescribed:- a). educational qualification (40 marks) ..... selection: short listing was firstly done on the basis of educational qualification and work experience and only thereafter would the interview be conducted in respect of the short listed persons and the weightage on account of higher qualifications ..... provisions of contract labour (regulation and abolition) act, 1970. it is for the industrial adjudicator to decide the said question keeping in view the evidences brought on records. .. and stated that the applicant had not been able .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Allahabad
..... is clarified that if under any central act or under any state act any degree/ diploma is granted by university, no formal order of the state government qua such degree/ diploma is necessary and that same shall be deemed to be necessary qualifications for appointment in the state services. 13. learned single ..... the selections on the posts of asstt. teachers (urdu), made without considering the case of those, who have already qualified and had preferential right over the selectees. in writ petition no.32760 of 2001 a direction was issued by the court that whenever any vacancy in ..... other training qualifications recognised by the government equivalent thereto. there is no such equivalence given for training qualifications for teaching in urdu medium under rule 8 (5), which provides training qualification of 2 years btc urdu special training course. 9. learned single judge observed ..... state of tamil nadu, air 2000 sc 3084 (paras 8, 9 and 10), and in state of rajasthan & ors. v. lata arun, jt 2002 (5) sc 210 (para 13). 6. rule 8 of the rules of 1981 is quoted as below:- "8. (1) the essential qualifications of candidates for appointment ..... service rules, 1981 (in short the rules of 1981), vide government order dated 26.9.1994. 5. shri k.s. kushwaha, learned standing counsel appearing for the state appellants submits:- a. the writ petition challenging the order of appointment dated 21.11.2008, by the basic shiksha adhikari, buland shahar appointing 31 persons as asstt. teachers urdu on the basis .....Tag this Judgment!