Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the east punjab extension of limitation act 1947 Court: karnataka Year: 1997

Dec 12 1997 (HC)

Mrs. Flora Chandrabai Vs. Mrs. Navaneetha Suganthamani and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-12-1997

Reported in : ILR1998KAR3685

..... it has to be an application to a court for the reason that sections 4 and 5 of the 1963 limitation act speak of expiry of prescribed period when court is closed and extension of prescribed period if applicant or the appellant satisfies the court that he had sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal or making the application during such period. article ..... kshirsagar and anr, : air1987mp145 bombay high court in vasudev daulatram v. sajni prem, : air1983bom268 and the calcutta high court and punjab and haryana high court in state of punjab v. sh. vishwajit singh and ors, . have also taken the view that limitation act, 1963 including article 137, has no application for grant of probate. we are in respectful agreement with the reasonings of the ..... said decisions.11. however the appellant referred to the decision of punjab & haryana high court in the case of 'in the matter of estate of gurcharan dass puri' reported ..... held therein that article 137 applies for obtaining letters of administration though not for 'probating a will'. besides the same court in a later decision i.e., in state of punjab referred to supra has distinguished the said case and has held, article 137 has no application for 'obtaining probate'.12. the next decision relied on by the appellant in hari .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //