Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the east punjab extension of limitation act 1947 Court: karnataka Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.071 seconds)

Jun 06 2016 (HC)

K.V. Shivakumar and Others Vs. National Institute of Mental Health and ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-06-2016

..... the mischief of principles of res judicata under section 11 of cpc? [v] whether the suit is barred by time in view of article 58 of the limitation act? point no.[i]: question of title 48. the learned counsel for the appellant contended that the plaintiff has filed the suit for declaration of title and for ..... section 4 (1) or section 6 (1) or the award proceedings to show that the said lands were acquired by the government for the purpose of extension of sanitorium building. ultimately, it concluded that the plaintiffs had satisfactorily proved that they had been in lawful possession over the suit schedule property as on the ..... plaintiff-institute also relied on the following judgments: in the case of girdhari lal bansal vs. the chairman, bhakra beas management board, chandigarh and others [air 1985 punjab and haryana 219] it was held as under:- 4. after hearing the learned counsel for the parties, i give the following issue-wise. issue no. 1. ..... dated 12.10.1944, the lands were notified for acquisition for construction of tuberculosis sanitarium. dealing with the lands of munivenkatappa in r.a.no.132/1947-48, it is observed that the claim relates to payment for loss occasioned by sufficient time not being allowed to remove the seedlings on the land ..... have produced certified copy of the judgment of the division bench of this court in regular appeal nos.125, 131 and 132 of 1947-48 decided on 1.4.1949. one such appeal was preferred by y. munivenkatappa who was the appellant in r.a.no.132 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 06 2016 (HC)

K v Shivakumar Vs. National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-06-2016

..... mischief of principles of res judicata under section 11 of cpc?. [v]. whether the suit is barred by time in view of article 58 of the limitation act?. - 53 - point no.[i].: question of title48 the learned counsel for the appellant contended that the plaintiff has filed the suit for declaration of title ..... section 4 (1) or section 6 (1) or the award proceedings to show that the said lands were acquired by the government for the purpose of extension of sanitorium building. ultimately, it concluded that the plaintiffs had satisfactorily proved that they had been in lawful possession - 165 - over the suit schedule ..... in the first suit, the second suit cannot be considered to have been brought in respect of the same subject matter as the first suit .112. the punjab high court in the case of alla naur sheikh mohd. ismail vs. mohd. nisa abdul rehman and others [air1962punjab50 held as under:- - 148 - 6. ..... 12.10.1944, the lands were notified for acquisition for construction of tuberculosis sanitarium. dealing with the lands of munivenkatappa in r.a. no.132/1947-48, it is observed that the claim relates to - 65 - payment for loss occasioned by sufficient time not being allowed to remove the seedlings ..... /o narasimha gowda age: major, no.3, church street basavanagudi bangalore 560 004.13. smt.meera nandakumar w/o nandakumar age: major, no.28, upstairs east circle road vishweshwarapuram bangalore 560 004.14. d.vijayaraghavan s/o d.t.l.iyengar age: major, no.869, 20th main, 32nd cross, 8th block, .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //