Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the east punjab police protector of railways act 1947 Court: kolkata Page 1 of about 2 results (0.022 seconds)

Nov 16 2007 (HC)

Association for Protection of Democratic Rights Vs. State of West Beng ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2007(4)CHN842

..... that the investigation had been conducted illegally in contravention of sub-section (4) of section 5 of the prevention of corruption act, 1947. under this section a police officer, below the rank of deputy superintendent, shall not investigate any offence punishable under sub-section (2) of section 5 ..... a fundamental right by being included in part iii of the constitution. it was observed that the supreme court is, thus, constituted the protector and guarantor of fundamental rights and, therefore, consistently with the responsibility so laid upon it, cannot refuse to entertain applications seeking protection against ..... court. in view of the law of the land as it stands declared in l. robert d'souza v. executive engineer, southern railways in air 1982 sc 854, we must hold that the termination of the services of the petitioners in these cases constitutes retrenchment and for ..... different political parties were pursuing different agendas. the meeting dated 19.02.2007 which was held by the district magistrate (east midnapore) quite clearly shows that the police was present in nandigram in large numbers. on paper decisions have been taken by all the political parties to restore peace ..... cbi enquiry was directed to be held by the court:1. punjab & haryana high court bar association, chandigarh through its secretary v. state of punjab and ors. reported in : 1994crilj1368 ;2. punjab & haryana high court bar association v. state of punjab and ors. reported in : (1996)4scc742 ;3. shashikant v .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 27 1948 (PC)

Jnan Prosanna Das Gupta and anr. Vs. the Province of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1949CriLJ1

..... and was not relying on any power conferred on it by last iii of the concurrent list, in that case it as argued that the punjab eestitution of mortgaged lands act, 19s8, was invalid in that a number of its provisions were in fact legislation on matters falling within list iii, namely, items 7, ..... an order then, without prejudice to the provisions of sab-section (6), he may be removed from such area or place by an; police officer or by any person acting on behalf of the provinelal government.(4) so long as such an order as aforesaid in respect of an; person directing that he be ..... 51 c. w. n. 599 : a.i.r. (84) 1947 f. c. 60.) in the first case which dealt with the punjab restitution of mortgaged land act. lord wright held that section 107, government of india act, 1935, had no application in a case where the. province was acting wholly within its powers under list ii, i, e., the provincial ..... declared to be, void to the extent of the repugnancy. existing law is defined in section 311, government of india act, and clearly includes acts passed by the central legislature before 15th august 1947. it was contended that the terms of the governor's ordinance were repugnant to a number of ms-tions of the ..... nothing should be done to make it difficult or impossible for the highest court of the province to act as the great umpire on constitutional issues or to undermine the authority of the court as the protector of the rights which are guaranteed to the citizens by the law of the land.93. the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //