Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the east punjab police protector of railways act 1947 Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.030 seconds)

Oct 03 2001 (SC)

Ghulam Qadir Vs. Special Tribunal and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-03-2001

Reported in : JT2001(9)SC231; 2001(6)SCALE667; (2002)1SCC33

..... the evacuees from pakistan who were allotted some land on quasi-permanent tenure. after the allotment, the state government issued a notification under section 14 of the east punjab holdings (consolidation and prevention of fragmentation) act, 1948 declaring its intention to make a scheme for the consolidation of the holdings and in 1955 the consolidation officer proposed substitution of some other lands of ..... by the custodian before an appropriate authority for protection of the rights na interests of the evacuee of which he is the protector and custodian, till the property is restored to the evacuee under the act. the custodian under the act does not perform only judicial or quasi-judicial powers but is also entrusted with the administration of the property having the rights ..... trustee or as a beneficiary or in any other capacity), and includes any property which has been obtained by any person from an evacuee after the 14th day of august, 1947, by any mode of transfer unless such transfer has been confirmed by the custodian, but does not include- (i) any ornaments, any wearing appeal, cooking vessels or other household ..... no reliable evidence with regard to the other owners of the property, namely ghulam mohammed and shah begum, who were found to have migrated to pakistan in the disturbances of 1947. he concluded:-'i, therefore, find strong grounds for setting aside the impugned order dated 18.8.1987 of the custodian and accept the revision petition filed by the applicants. it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 2001 (HC)

Shirish Finance and Investment (P.) Ltd. Vs. M. Sreenivasulu Reddy

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-28-2001

Reported in : 2002(1)BomCR419

..... of sikkim : 1998crilj3013 , which, he submitted, clinched the issue. the facts of the case were that the prevention of corruption act, 1947 was extended to the state of sikkim with effect from 1-9-1976. cases were registered by the c.b.i. against ..... meaning. the court must confine itself to the words within their natural meaning. reliance was placed on the following decisions: (i) london & north eastern railway co. v. berrimal [1946] ac 278 . (ii) tolaram v. state of bombay : [1955]1scr158 . (iii) union of india v. rai ..... been cited at the bar on this question, and we shall now proceed to consider the same. 161. in state of punjab v. mohar singh pratap singh air 1955 sc 84, the respondent had filed a claim in accordance with ordinance no. 7 ..... the securities market. as a market regulator, it is a protector of investors, not managements. the provisions of the sebi act, the 1994 and 1997 regulations, the depositories act and section 111a of the companies act show that there is a significant shift of law, as ..... , etc. relying upon the judgment of the supreme court in cit v. east coast commercial co. ltd. air 1967 sc 768, he contended that no direct evidence of overt act or concert between the members of the group having control over voting rights is ..... a petition under sections 397 and 398 of the companies act and sought supersession of the board. it was sought to be urged, on the basis of an affidavit filed by the deputy' superintendent of police in the supreme court, that the balaji group were .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //