Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the east punjab refugees rehabilitation registration of land claims act 1948 Page 1 of about 134 results (0.057 seconds)

Sep 02 1978 (SC)

Sadhu Singh (Deceased) and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1979SC1609; 1980Supp(1)SCC787; [1979]3SCR1279

..... of allotment; (iii) where the allotment is to be cancelled or varied-(a) in accordance with an order made by a competent authority under section 8 of the east punjab refugees (registration of land claims) act, 1948; (b) on account of the failure of the allottee to take possession of the allotted evacuee property within six months of the date of allotment; (c) in ..... rehabilitation of displaced persons.then came the two notifications nos. sro 129 dt. july 22, 1952 and sro 351 dated feb. 13, 1953 amending and recasting sub-rule (6) of rule 14 of the central rules of 1950 as under:(6) notwithstanding anything contained in this rule, the custodian of evacuee property in each of the states of punjab and patiala and east punjab ..... a) that the allotment is contrary to the orders of the punjab government or the instructions of the financial commissioner, relief and rehabilitation, or of the custodian, evacuee property, punjab; (b) that the claims of other parties with respect to the land have been established or accepted by the custodian or the rehabilitation authority; (c) that it is necessary or expedient to cancel ..... 1952.'6. thus the power of resumption or cancellation of quasi-permanent allotment was restricted and reduced.7. the next legislative measure is the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act, 1954 (act no. xliv of 1954), important provisions whereof which may be useful in dealing with the first question may be noticed. section 4 provides for the time, the manner .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 1991 (HC)

Guran Ditta Vs. the Financial Commissioner (Revenue) and Secretary of ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1992P& H300

..... (mutalba arazi) had been filed by daulat ram as was required under the provisions of east punjab refugees registration of land (claims) act, 1948 nor was any application made within the date prescribed under rule 67-a of the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) rules 1956 (hereinafter to be referred as the rules of 1956). this order was passed on july 25, 1970 and it also contained a finding ..... of 1950) in respect of which a final order has been passed under that act or under the displaced persons (claims) supplementary act, 1954 (12 of 1954) and includes any claim registered on or before the 31st day of may, 1953 under the east punjab refugees (registration of land) (claims) act, 1948 (east punjab act xii of 1948) or under the patiala refugees (registration of land) (claims) ordinance 2004 (order 10 of 2004 bk) and verified by any authority appointed ..... .' 8. section 2(e) as has been reproduced above would show that there is provision in east punjab refugees (registration of land) (claims) act, 1948 which envisages registration of claims regarding land. the definition further envisages that only such claims would, be considered as verified as had been, registered under the act of 1953 i.e. east punjabi refugees (registration of claims) act on or before 31st day of may, 1953. it would, thus, be seen that the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1957 (HC)

S. Kabul Singh Vs. Niranjan Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1958P& H168

..... say that kabul singh, niranjan singh and gurbachan singh have all cheated the rehabilitation department by obtaining allotments of much larger areas than were due to them. it does not appearthat any action has been taken against them under section 8 of the east punjab refugees (registration of land claims) act, 1948. in this case i have a shrewd suspicion that though the real state ..... of affairs was known to kabul singh, niranjan singh and gurbachan singh, by mutual connivance at the time of oral verification of their respective claims they combined to cheat the rehabilitation department by kabul singh getting his claim verified in respect of ..... learned single judge was justified in setting aside an order of the deputy custodian-general. 2. bhagat singh respondent complained to the rehabilitation department that kabul singh, niranjan singh and gurbachan singh had obtained allotments of land in excess of the allotments to which they were entitled and the department finding the allegations to be true, withdrew an area ..... to seek redress at the hands of the deputy custodian-general (mr. pahwa) under section 27 of the administration of evacuee property act. the learned counsel for bhagat singh contended that as the plot of land in question was allotted to his client on 4-2-1953. it was not within the competence of the additional custodian to .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 07 2003 (HC)

Sat Parkash and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2003)135PLR78

..... of 1950) in respect of which a final order has been passed under that act or under the displaced persons (claims) supplementary act, 1954 (12 of 1954), and includes any claim registered on or before the 3lst day of may, 1953 under the east punjab refugees (registration of land claims) act, 1948 (east punjab act, (xii of 1948) or under the patiala refugees (registration of land claims) ordinance, 2004 (order 10 of 2004 bk) and verified by any authority appointed ..... proper to notice the relevant statutory provisions. the 1948 act was enacted with a view to rehabilitate and compensate those,' who had suffered during partition and had to migrate from the territory which is now known as pakistan. section 2(d) of the 1948 act contains the definition of the term 'refugee' and section 4 thereof provides for registration of land claims. these two provisions along with rule 3 ..... age. after 31 years of their migration, the petitioners submitted application dated 12th june, 1978 (annexure p.1) to the land claims officer, punjab, department of rehabilitation, jalandhar for consideration of their claim for allotment of land in lieu of land left in pakistan. the managing officer (lands), jalandhar rejected their application vide his order dated 23rd june, 1978 on the ground that the same was time barred .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 1973 (HC)

Mirchumal Samandas and ors. Vs. the Union of India and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1974Guj174

..... in respect of which a final order has been passed under that act or under the displaced persons (claims) supplementary act, 1954 (12 of 1954), and includes any claim registered on or before the 31st day of may, 1953. under the east punjab refugees (registration of land claims) act, 1948 (east punjab act, xii of 1948) or under the patiala refugees (registration of land) (claims) ordinance 2004 (order 10 of 2004 bk) and verified by ..... special procedure for payment of compensation in certain cases specified therein. these are the sections which lay down the procedure in relation to claims. section 11 enables the central government to pay rehabilitation grant or any other grants out of the compensation pool to a displaced person under such conditions and to such extent and in ..... , his suit could not be maintained. he also held that the jurisdiction of the civil court was barred by section 36 of the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act. 1954. in view of his findings on these two preliminary issues he dismissed the suit. the plaintiff appealed to the district court against the decree passed by the ..... (d) with which we are concerned in this case. rule 2 (c) which defines the express-ion 'compensation' may also be noted. ''compensation' includes rehabilitation grant where such rehabilitation grant is payable along with the compensation'. chapter 11 lays down the procedure for submission of compensation applications and determination of public dues. chapter iii lays down the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 1960 (SC)

Makhan Lal Malhotra and ors. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1961SC392; [1961]2SCR120

..... and rehabilitation act), act 44 of 1954. the challenge is on the ground of violation of art. 14 of the constitution. it is unnecessary at this stage to set out the various acts and regulations which were passed in regard to displaced persons dealing with verification of their claims and the giving of compensation to them. 4. on april 1, 1948, the east punjab refugees (registration of claims) act, 1948, east punjab act 8 of 1948, was ..... passed and this was followed by the east punjab refugees (registration of land claims) act 12 of 1948. in the latter act 'land' was defined in section 2(b) to mean ..... . 'land which is not occupied as the site of any building in .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 22 1967 (HC)

Gurbachan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secretary to Govt ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1968P& H242

..... on or beforethe 31st day of may, 1953, undei the eastpunjab refugees (registration of landclaims) act, 1948 (east puniab act 12 of1948) or under the patiala refugees (registration of land) (claims) ordinance 2004(order 10 of 2004 of bk.) and verified by anyauthority appointed for the purpose by thegovernment of punjab the government ofpatiala and east punjab states union, asthe case may be, which has not been satisfied wholly or partially by the ..... lost properties in pakistan. it is pointed out that the entire work of registration and the verification of the claims was carried out with the avowed object of compensating the aforesaid persons there was also the allied purpose of rehabilitation of displaced persons. the compensation under section 8 of the act way- payable in different modes one of these was by sale of the ..... -claimant' so the appellant failed in his revision application before the chief settlement com-missioner and subsequently he failed in his application under section 33of the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act 1954 (act 44 of 1954) it was after that that he filed his petition under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution questioning the legality of the orders of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 1960 (HC)

Charanji Lal Jagannath Arora and anr. Vs. Smt. Inder Devi and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1961P& H466

..... 1950) in respect of which a final order has been passed under that act or under the displaced persons (claims) supplementary act, 1954 (xii of 1954), and includes any claim registeredon or before the 31st day of may, 1953, under the east punjab refugees (registration of claims) act, 1948, (east punjab act xii of 1948) or under the patiala refugees (registration of land) (claims) ordinance, 2004 (order 10 of 2004 bk) and verified by any ..... satisfied wholly or partially by the allotment of any evacuee land under the relevant notificationsspecified in section 10 of the act would not be included in the definition of a 'verified claim'. among the notifications referred to in section 10 are 'the notifications of the government of punjab in the department of rehabilitation no. 4891-s or 4892-s, dated 8th july ..... she should be declared to have a share.' thus what remains to be determined is whether her claim falls under the provisions of section 9 of the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act, 44 of 1954. 14. section 9 of this act reads as follows:-'where there is any dispute as to the person or persons who are entitled to ..... shri h s. bhandari, additional district judge, ferozepur, on 15th july, 1957. he held that there was nothing in the provisions of the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act, 44 of 1954, to debar the civil courts from entertaining the suit, and after affirming the decision of the trial court on other issues, he decreed shrimati indar devi .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 05 1996 (SC)

Pritam Kaur (Smt) Vs. Dy. Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (1997)10SCC582; [1996]Supp9SCR570

..... .' section 2(e) defines 'verified claim' thus:(e) 'verified claim' means any claim registered under the displaced persons (claims) act, 1950 in respect of which a final order has been passed under that act or under the displaced persons (claims) supplementary act, 1954, [and includes any claim registered on or before 31st day of may, 1953, under the (east punjab refugees (registration of land claims) act, 1948] or under the patiala refugees (registration of land claims) ordinance, 2004, and verified by ..... the last week of april 1955 in pakistan. they filed their application under section 4 of the act on december 19, 1955 claiming rehabilitation compensation under the act. in lieu thereof, the authorities at different stages verified the claims and found them entitled to the compensation and consequentially the land in possession of the appellant was allotted to them. the appellant had challenged in the proceedings ..... august 1, 1985 dismissing the writ petition on the ground that the conclusion reached and the findings recorded by the authorities under the displaced persons (compensation and rehabilitation) act, 1954, (44 of 1954) (for short, the 'act') are a question of fact and exercising the power under article 226 of the constitution could not be reopened by the court. with a view to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 30 1967 (HC)

Munshi Ram and ors. Vs. Financial Commissioner, Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1968P& H162

..... was then repealed by the east punjab refugees (registration of land claims) act, 1948 (east punjab act no. xii of 1948), which came into force on 3rd of april, 1948. in that act also the definition of the words 'claim' and 'refugee' was the same as in the east punjab ordinance no. vii of 1948.23. then came the east punjab displaced persons (land resettlement) ordinance (east punjab ordinance no xiv of 1949) which was published in the east punjab gazette extraordinary of 25th of ..... sons. secondly, it is pertinent to mention that even though bishan dass had died on 11th of april, 1948, the appellants never put in any claim before the rehabilitation authorities that the said allotment be made in their names and not in the name of their deceased father, especially when according to them, they ..... of march 1943, it was he who had filed the claim before the rehabilitation authorities for the land left by him in pakistan. the process of the verification of his claim naturally took some time, but unfortunately while that process was still going on, he died on 11th of april 1948 before any land was actually allotted to him the said allotment was made ..... 28. there is no substance in this contention as well. in the first place, we have to see in whose favour the allotment had actually been made by the rehabilitation authorities and as i have said, there is no doubt about this question of fact that the allotment had been made in the name of bishan dass and not his .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //