Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the essential commodities act 1955 Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 12,101 results (0.081 seconds)

Feb 17 1956 (HC)

Chunilall Rajendra Kumar Vs. State of Manipur and anr.

Court : Guwahati

..... petitioner made enquiries and it was then found that an act had been passed on 1-4-1955 by the parliament being act 10 of 1955 (essential commodities act, 1955) which was altered by provisions of the essential commodities ordinance, 1955 by including in the definition of the 'essential commodities' foodstuffs, edible oilseeds and oil. the petitioner has contended that this act 10 of 1955 was not published in the manipur gazette at all. the ..... issuing permits beyond the provision already contained in the said central order.lastly, it has been contended that the legality of the said central order issued in accordance with the essential commodities act, 1955 and with the approval of the central government cannot be challenged unless the government of india is made a party to this petition.15. so far as the question of ..... contention of the petitioner.29. it has further been urged by the learned advocate for the petitioner on the basis of sub-section (6) of section 3, essential commodities act, 1955, that the manipur foodgrains (movement) control order, 1955, is invalid because this order has not been laid before both the houses of parliament until now, even though the order was issued on 31-5 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1956 (HC)

Ghanashyam Das and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1956Ori194; 22(1956)CLT375; 1956CriLJ1334

..... that notwithstanding the expiry of the central act all orders made under the central act shall be deemed to have been made under the ordinance and shall continue in force. this ordinance was subsequently replaced by an act of parliament known as the essential commodities act 1955 (act 10 of 1955) in which by section 16 all orders deemed to have been made ..... under the ordinance were declared to be orders deemed to have been made under the act itself.hence, the central order of 1941 which was passed in exercise of ..... in list iii in schedule 7 for the purpose of legislating in respect of certain essential commodities. the president first promulgated an ordinance known as the essential commodities ordinance 1955 (ordinance no. 1 of 1955) by which powers similar to those contained in the central act were conferred in respect of certain specified essential commodities including iron and steel.in clause 16 pf the ordinance it was further provided .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 1956 (SC)

Ch. Tika Ramji and ors. Etc. Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1956SC676; [1956]1SCR393

..... industry to provide by notified order for regulation of supply and distribution thereof and trade and commerce therein.13. on 1st april, 1955, parliament enacted the essential commodities act, 1955 (act x of 1955) to provide in the interests of the general public for the control of production, supply and distribution of, and trade and commerce in ..... , certain commodities. the essential commodity there was defined to mean any of the following classes of commodities :' (v) foodstuffs, including edible oilseeds and oils; .................... (xi) any other class of commodity which ..... dealt with by parliament as well as by the state legislatures and it was in exercise of this jurisdiction that parliament enacted act x of 1955. the list of essential commodities defined in section 2 of the act comprised foodstuffs, including edible oilseeds and oils, cattlefodder, raw cotton and cotton-seed and raw jute which were items (b), ..... and distribution of,..... foodstuffs (including edible oilseeds and oil),.......' the life of the act was accordingly extendedfrom time to time up to 26th january 1955 by acts passed by parliament.act xxiv of 1946 defined an essential commodity to mean anyof the following classes of commodities :'(1) foodstuffs,..........' 8. food crops were defined as including crops of sugarcane.9 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1957 (HC)

P.K.N. Abdul Mazid Vs. the State of Madras and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1957Mad551

..... passed by the collector.7. the madras rico mills licensing order, 1955 was issued under madras act 29 of 1949. these rules were amended by the central government in exercise of the powers conferred on it by the essentials commodities act, 1955 (act 10 of 1955). this amendment was ordered on 31-5-1956. rule 11-a ..... under article 226 of the constitution by the issue of a writ of certiorari and (3) in any event since the relief of certiorari is essentially a discretionary relief, this court, in the circumstances of this case, should not exercise its discretion in favour of the petitioner by setting aside ..... the instructions issued by the government in january 1956 apparently fell within the scope of rule 2 (2) of the madras rice mills licensing order, 1955, which vested in the state government a power to issue general directions to licensing authorities. the learned counsel for the 3rd respondent urged that had ..... the madras rice mills licensing order was quite different from that of the motor vehicles act under which arose the case that was decided in w. a. no. 107 of 1955 (mad)(a). in writ pp. 107 of 1955 (mad)(a) it was pointed out that the petitioner had a statutory right to ..... after the introduction of the scheme of licensing rice mills under the madras act 29 of 1949, the petitioner obtained the requisite licence. the licensing is now regulated by the madras rice mills licensing order, 1955.2. on 1-8-1955, the third respondent bala-krishnan chettiar applied to the collector for ,a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 19 1957 (HC)

P.K.N. Abdul Mazid Vs. the State of Madras Represented by the Secretar ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1957)2MLJ1

..... jurisdiction to interfere with an order passed by the collector.7. the madras rice mills licensing order, 1955, was issued under madras act (xxix of 1949). these rules were amended by the central government in exercise of the powers conferred on it by the essential commodities act, 1955 (x of 1955). this amendment was ordered on 31st may, 1956. rule 11-a of the madras rice mills ..... jurisdiction this court could exercise under article 226 of the constitution by the issue of a writ of certiorari and (3) in any event, since the relief of certiorari is essentially a discretionary relief, this court in the circumstances of this case, should not exercise its discretion in favour of the petitioner by setting aside the orders passed by the government ..... case. he pointed out that the scheme of the madras rice mills licensing order was quite different from that of the motor vehicles act under which arose the case that was decided in writ appeal no. 107 of 1955. it was pointed out that the petitioner had a statutory right to be heard before the statutory authority exercised its jurisdiction. the learned ..... , tiruvadanai taluk, ramanathapuram district. after the introduction of the scheme of licensing rice mills under the madras act (xxix of 1949), the petitioner obtained the requisite licence. the licensing is now regulated by the madras rice mills licensing order, 1955.2. on 1st august, 1955, the third respondent balakrishnan chettiar applied to the collector for a license to work a rice mill of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 1957 (HC)

Public Prosecutor Vs. M.B. Buhari and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1958CriLJ387

..... by the state against the order passed by the chief presidency magistrate in c.c. no. 4324 of 1956.2. the respondents are charged under section 7(2) of the essential commodities act, 1955, read with section 4 (1) of the vegetable oil products control order, 1947, the circumstances under which the prosecution was launched are these.3. under the directions from the deputy ..... laid down in the rules framed under or. 4 (1) of the vegetable oil products control order, 1947. stocking, therefore, of such commodity for sale is liable to be dealt with under section 7 (2) of the essential commodities act, act x of 1955.4. under section 4 (1) of the vegetable oil products control order, no producer to whom the order applies shall stock or ..... accepting or rejecting the notification of the same in the madras police gazette. in the appeal before me the learned counsel, who appears for the respondent, does not dispute the act that on account of the amendment, any person who stocks also will he liable and ha is not seeking to support his acquittal on the ground on which the lower .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 1957 (HC)

State of Manipur (Now Union Territory) Vs. Chunilal Saraogi and anr.

Court : Guwahati

..... an attempt to transport the chira in contravention of the provisions of section 3(2) of the manipur food grains (movement) control order, 1956, punishable under section 7 of the essential commodities act, 1955.13. as regards punishment i think that in the circumstances of the case, and the fact that i propose to order forfeiture of the entire quantity of the chira, a ..... maunds in 33 bags) on 5-3-56, in contravention of the provisions of s, 3 of the manipur foodgrains (movement) control order, 1956, punishable under section 7 of the essential commodities act, 1955.2. the facts are simple and not much in dispute. there is also evidence to prove them. section 3 of the above-mentioned order of 1956 runs thus:3(1 ..... . it is impossible to accept that he was not aware of the whole position or that he did not know that the permit under colour of which he wanted to act, had already expired. a permit in the name of another person cannot be used by a different person is more than obvious. the very fact that the chira was hidden .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 03 1957 (HC)

State of Manipur (Now Union Territory) Vs. Chunilal Saraogi and anr.

Court : Guwahati

Reported in : 1958CriLJ1487

..... an attempt to transport the chira in contravention of the provisions of section 3(2) of the manipur food grains (movement) control order, 1956, punishable under section 7 of the essential commodities act, 1955.13. as regards punishment i think that in the circumstances of the case, and the fact that i propose to order forfeiture of the entire quantity of the chira, a ..... maunds in 33 bags) on 5-3-56, in contravention of the provisions of s, 3 of the manipur foodgrains (movement) control order, 1956, punishable under section 7 of the essential commodities act, 1955.2. the facts are simple and not much in dispute. there is also evidence to prove them. section 3 of the above-mentioned order of 1956 runs thus:3(1 ..... . it is impossible to accept that he was not aware of the whole position or that he did not know that the permit under colour of which he wanted to act, had already expired. a permit in the name of another person cannot be used by a different person is more than obvious. the very fact that the chira was hidden .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 1957 (HC)

Ramrichpal Agarwalla and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1958Cal257,62CWN561

..... said order, and for other reliefs. all parties were restrained by an interim injunction from removing any goods from the mill premises.4. the essential commodities act 1955 (act x of 1955) is a central act, which came into operation on 1-4-1955. trade and commerce within the state is a state subject (list ii, item 26 of the 7th schedule) but it must be read ..... exercise of the powers conferred on the government of west bengal under clause (f) of sub-section (2) of section 3 of the essential commodities act. 1955 (x of 1955), read with clause (b) of section 5 of the said act and order no. sro 1925 of the government of india dated 7-6-1957, the governor is pleased to make this order requiring you ..... essential commodities'-- (1) if the central government is of the opinion that it is necessary or expedient so to do for ..... the general public, for the control of the production, supply and distribution of and trade and commerce in, certain commodities.' in order to appreciate the argument made in this case, it will be necessary to consider several provisions of the essential commodities act (hereinafter referred to as the 'act'), which are set out hero under:'3. 'powers to control production, supply distribution, etc., of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 1957 (HC)

Indian Sugars and Refineries Ltd. Vs. State of Mysore and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1958Kant64; AIR1958Mys64; ILR1957KAR359; (1958)36MysLJ34

..... act, xx of 1949 nugatory. in order to determine ..... that these acts have made the madras sugar factories control ..... the aforesaid purpose are the essential goods (declaration and regulation of tax on sale or purchase) act (lii of 1952) which came into operation on 9-8-52, essential commodities act, x of 1955, order dated 27-8-55 passed pursuant to the essential commodities act whereby sugarcane became a controlled commodity and industries development and regulation act, lxv of 1951 (by this act sugar became a controlled commodity).the learned advocate contended .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //