Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the guru nanak dev university amritsar act 1969 Court: guwahati Page 1 of about 2 results (0.016 seconds)

Nov 24 2000 (HC)

Araya Samaj and anr. Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... etc. etc. v. state of punjab and others, (1971) 2 sco 269, while dealing with the status of the arya samaj in relation to guru nanak university, amritsar act, 1969, the supreme court held as follows:- '12. for the purpose of the article 29(1) even though it may not be necessary to enquire whether ..... and calling upon all the inspector of schools to strictly follow the provisions of the draft rules are obviously violative of the provisions of the act of 1981. by these instructions contained in annexure 3 and 4, the state authorities have definitely exceeded their powers in violation of the ..... managing committee of the concerned school. this constitution is obviously contrary to the provisions of article 38 of the memorandum of association. since the act of 1981 does not contemplate taking over of the management of the minority institutions, or to exercise any control in the nature of constitution of ..... and the constitution and function of their managing committees other than those of minority schools. it is, therefore, clear that no provision of the act of 1981 is in derogation of the rights of the petitioners guaranteed under article 30. 13. article 38 of the memorandum of association vests ..... . the percentage of hindu population in the state of meghalaya available in paragraph 7 of the judgment in relation to the meghalaya school education act, 1981 clearly establish that arya samaj is a religious as well as linguistic minority in the state of meghalaya having a distinct entity of their .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 2000 (HC)

Araya Samaj and anr. Vs. State of Meghalaya and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... etc. etc. v. state of punjab and others, (1971) 2 sco 269, while dealing with the status of the arya samaj in relation to guru nanak university, amritsar act, 1969, the supreme court held as follows:-'12. for the purpose of the article 29(1) even though it may not be necessary to enquire whether ..... and calling upon all the inspector of schools to strictly follow the provisions of the draft rules are obviously violative of the provisions of the act of 1981. by these instructions contained in annexure 3 and 4, the state authorities have definitely exceeded their powers in violation of the ..... managing committee of the concerned school. this constitution is obviously contrary to the provisions of article 38 of the memorandum of association. since the act of 1981 does not contemplate taking over of the management of the minority institutions, or to exercise any control in the nature of constitution of ..... and the constitution and function of their managing committees other than those of minority schools. it is, therefore, clear that no provision of the act of 1981 is in derogation of the rights of the petitioners guaranteed under article 30.13. article 38 of the memorandum of association vests ..... hand. the percentage of hindu population in the state of meghalaya available in paragraph 7 of the judgment in relation to the meghalaya school education act, 1981 clearly establish that arya samaj is a religious as well as linguistic minority in the state of meghalaya having a distinct entity of their .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //