Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR1982Raj297; 1982()WLN294
..... wiless ihat is done our economic and social revolution will remain incomplete.'(1)83. shri p.c. bedwa, member faculty of law and board of studies in law, lecturer. guru nanak dev university, amritsar, opined as under:--'it is a matter of regret that even after three decades since the advent ofthe constitution, the objectives envisaged for the economic and social advancement of these ..... been 10 years' extension. it has now become 40years instead of original 10 years after being extended to 20 by 8th amendment of 1959 and 30 by 23rd amendment of 1969.16. in the original form in 1950, it was as under:--'notwithstanding anything in the foregoing provisions of this part, the provisions of this constitution relating to--(a) the ..... that 'vichitra' would now realise that what he was pleading for was 'inequality', and oppression of his own segment.94. the rejection of his plea would bring 'equality' and act as 'blessing in disguise', and real and effective homage to article 46.95. vichitra is unfortunately labouring under the fallacy and obsolete dogmatic, reactionary, outdated and outlived principles laid down ..... air 1967 sc 1643) a giriian (scheduled tribe) is attacking the 45th amendment (d. d. basu's shorter constitution of india, p. 807. eighth edn. the constitution(forty-fifth amendment) act, 1980) for giving a decisive death-blow to article 334 of the constitution. vichitra, the petitioner, little realises the distinction between homicide and suicide. the billion dollar question is his .....Tag this Judgment!
Court : Rajasthan Jaipur
..... , new delhi vs. lieutenant governor, government of nct, delhi & ors.(supra) so as the judgment in the case of balmokand khatri educational and industrial trust, amritsar v. state of punjab & ors. (supra) and also in the case of executive engineer, jal nigam central stores division, u.p. v. suresh nand ..... consequences of vesting.the same aspect was earlier considered by the honb'le apex court in the case of balmokand khatri educational and industrial trust, amritsar v. state of punjab & ors. reported in (1996) 4 scc 212. para 5 of the aforesaid judgment is quoted hereunder for ready reference ..... 24.03.1973 has been enclosed as a first document. the aforesaid notice was issued under section 52(2) of the uit act of 1959 (though mentioned as 1969 in hindi). perusal of notice does not show use of word vacant before word land. this is apart from the fact that ..... crores. however, the affidavits given by the chief secretary, state of rajasthan clarifies the position, thus we need not to makeobservation regarding the act of the official respondents.21. the writ petition is accordingly allowed holding that the private respondents are not in rightful possession of the property in ..... acquire the land of ram bagh area and, thereafter, a gazette notification was issued under the provisions of rajasthan urban improvement trust act, 1959 (for short uit act of 1959). acquisition was challenged by brigadier bhawani singh (erstwhile ruler), gandhi grah nirman co-operative society and many other persons. .....Tag this Judgment!