Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-24-1978
Reported in : 1986(2)ARBLR303(Delhi); ILR1979Delhi236
..... exceeds twenty five thousand rupees, since raised to fifty thousand rupees by section 3 of the delhi high court (amendment) act, 1969 (act no. 37 of 1969). (25) section 7 of the delhi high court act, 1966, deals with the practice and procedure to be followed in, the high court of delhi. the said section ..... so when the defendants have categorically contended that their sales are effected mainly in the state of rajasthan and to a very limited extent at amritsar and nepal. it may bear mention here that the plaintiff in paragraph 13 of the plaint had contended that the washing soap under the ..... of which exceeds fifty thousand rupees, as amended by section 3 of the delhi high court (amendment) act, 1969. it would, thereforee, be seen that after the coming into force of delhi high court act, 1966, as amended, this high court has become the principal civil court of original jurisdiction with respect ..... that the added matter is sufficient to distinguish his goods from those of the plaintiff. similarview was taken earlier by a division bench of this court in nanak chand and others v. kohinoor chemical co. ltd. and was reiterated by this court in khemraj shrikrishnadas v. m/s. garg and co. and ..... civil proceeding arising under this chapter in respect of the infringement of copyright in any work or the infringement of any other right conferred by this act shall be instituted in the district court having jurisdiction. (2)for the purpose of sub-section (1), a 'district court having jurisdiction shall .....Tag this Judgment!