Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the guru nanak dev university amritsar act 1969 Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 1 results (0.017 seconds)

Apr 20 2010 (HC)

Sudesh Rani and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-20-2010

..... over boys girls over all boys girls overall all(a) campus 1102 778 1880 55 34 89 4.99 4.37 4.73note: universities of punjab here means four universities, viz, punjabi university, patiala, panjab university, chandigarh, punjab agricultural university, ludhiana and guru nanak dev university, amritsar.source: primary survey.12. on the strength of facts and figures, shown above, it was stated that the proportion of rural students ..... possible to segregate returns on the basis of urban and rural. moreover there is no definition of urban and rural assesses in income tax act, 1961.14. the state counsel has also shown us report of punjabagricultural university regarding survey conducted on farmers and agricultural labourers. this study was conducted in sangrur and bhatinda districts, wherein it has come to the ..... policy underlying the statute and the object intended to be achieved by it. having ascertained the policy and the object of the act, the court has to apply a dual test in examining the validity, the test being, whether the classification is rational and based upon an intelligible differentia which distinguishes persons ..... and (ii) that that differentia must have a rational relation to the object sought to be achieved by the act. what is necessary is that there must be a nexus between the basis of classification and the object of the act. when a law is challenged as violative of article 14, it is necessary in the first place to ascertain the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 12 2010 (SC)

S.S. ChheenA. Vs. Vijay Kumar Mahajan and Another.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-12-2010

..... in criminal revision no.1800 of 2008 dated 17.2.2009.3. the appellant s.s. chheena was a security officer at guru nanak dev university, amritsar. this job was accepted by him after his retirement from the indian police service (ips). he is seriously aggrieved by the order of the additional ..... circumstances.28. abetment involves a mental process of instigating a person or intentionally aiding a person in doing of a thing. without a positive act on the part of the accused to instigate or aid in committing suicide, conviction cannot be sustained. the intention of the legislature and the ..... meaning of the words "instigation" and "goading". the court opined that there should be intention to provoke, incite or encourage the doing of an act by the latter. each person's suicidability pattern is different from the other. each person has his own idea of self-esteem and self-respect. ..... ". para 20 reads as under: (scc p. 629) "20. instigation is to goad, urge forward, provoke, incite or encourage to do `an act'. to satisfy the requirement of instigation though it is not necessary that actual words must be used to that effect or what constitutes instigation must necessarily and ..... code, however its meaning and import is well known and requires no explanation. "sui" means "self" and "cide" means "killing", thus implying an act of self-killing. in short, a person committing suicide must commit it by himself, irrespective of the means employed by him in achieving his object of killing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 27 2010 (HC)

Sanjay Tyagi and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

Decided on : Nov-27-2010

..... , new delhi vs. lieutenant governor, government of nct, delhi & ors.(supra) so as the judgment in the case of balmokand khatri educational and industrial trust, amritsar v. state of punjab & ors. (supra) and also in the case of executive engineer, jal nigam central stores division, u.p. v. suresh nand ..... consequences of vesting.the same aspect was earlier considered by the honb'le apex court in the case of balmokand khatri educational and industrial trust, amritsar v. state of punjab & ors. reported in (1996) 4 scc 212. para 5 of the aforesaid judgment is quoted hereunder for ready reference ..... 24.03.1973 has been enclosed as a first document. the aforesaid notice was issued under section 52(2) of the uit act of 1959 (though mentioned as 1969 in hindi). perusal of notice does not show use of word vacant before word land. this is apart from the fact that ..... crores. however, the affidavits given by the chief secretary, state of rajasthan clarifies the position, thus we need not to makeobservation regarding the act of the official respondents.21. the writ petition is accordingly allowed holding that the private respondents are not in rightful possession of the property in ..... acquire the land of ram bagh area and, thereafter, a gazette notification was issued under the provisions of rajasthan urban improvement trust act, 1959 (for short uit act of 1959). acquisition was challenged by brigadier bhawani singh (erstwhile ruler), gandhi grah nirman co-operative society and many other persons. .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //