Court : Andhra Pradesh
Decided on : Jan-29-2004
Reported in : 2004(2)ALD1; 2004(1)ALT659
..... question that has no simple answer. each of the identified theories themselves invite interpretation. richard h. fallon jr., of the harvard university, after explaining the bases of each of the theories, argues that the supervening value of democracy does not undermine the competence of ..... may be prescribed. section 40(2) mandates the constitution of functional committees for agriculture, public health, water supply, sanitation, family planning, education, communication and for other purposes of the act; the constitution including co-option of members who are not members of the gram ..... the constitution. to cite a few judicial pronouncements on the question of repugnancy : karunanidhi v. union of india, : 1979crilj773 , raghubir v. state of haryana, : 1981crilj1497 , t.k.v.t.s.s. medical and educational charitable trust v. state of tamilnadu, air 1996 sc 2384, deepchand v. ..... a.p., : air2001sc1560 , a.p. sarpanchas association v. government of andhra pradesh, 2001 (4) ald 704, and ajit singh v. state of punjab, : air1999sc3471 ].(i) the courts cannot define the term 'local self-government' when the constitution has not chosen to enunciate objective standards to determine this ..... constitution being treated always as a living document. specific provision prevails over general provision (see harakchand ratanchand banthia v. union of india, : 1scr479 , and the decision referred (supra) (south india corporation private limited v. secretary, board of revenue, trivandrum and anr.). where .....Tag this Judgment!