Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the haryana punjab agricultural universities act 1970 Court: orissa Page 1 of about 4 results (0.044 seconds)

May 13 1975 (HC)

Bijoy Kumar Routrai and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1976Ori138

..... india body which collects data regarding relevant issues like the cost of production of the cereals from the states and other sources including agricultural universities and formulates its recommendations. the price thus fixed has been accepted by all states in india. the state government also took into consideration ..... into the cost of production. the commission is required to consider the data collected from the state government as well as the agricultural universities and the various other sources for determining such price. the commission has recommended the procurement price for paddy for 1974-75 marketing ..... and various other sources and the state government took into consideration the price fixed by the government of india on the recommendations of the agricultural prices commission before fixing the price by notification. thus the prices in question fixed by the state government for purchase of paddy under the ..... sustained,examining this aspect of the matter, a bench of the punjab & haryana high court, in the case of sujan singh v. state of haryana, air 1968 punj & har 363, observed:--'there is no doubt that section 5 of the central act empowers the central government to delegate the power to make orders under ..... -- (i) that when there was no controlled price for paddy and rice in the state of bihar, the market price prevailing in october, 1970 when the order was made or the post-harvest price which was likely to prevail during the post-harvest period ought to have been fixed and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2010 (HC)

Jayaram SwaIn and ors.Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

..... that the lands notified in the preliminary notifications are needed for the company for establishment of a university which was not in existence either under the orissa universities act or the university grant commission act at the time of initiation of the proceedings or at the time of publishing the declaration notifications ..... certainly affect the inter-generational equity for the people of the locality. the conversion of nature of the lands in question from agricultural to non-agricultural purpose would affect the environment and ecology at large and it would be certainly in the contravention of the aforesaid statutory laws and ..... for acquisition. 39. the apex court had also occasion to consider similar question in the case of babu ram and another v. state of haryana and anr., (2009) 10 scc 115. it is profitable to quote what the apex court observed in the aforesaid case which reads under : ..... known to the law of however high a degree of solemnity (p. 722). (emphasis made by this court ) in gurdial singh v. state of punjab, air 1980 sc 319, the apex court held as under: 9. the question, then, is what is mala fides in the jurisprudence of power ..... public interest litigation has been an extremely significant development in the history of the indian jurisprudence. the decisions of the supreme court in the 1970s loosened the strict locus standi requirements to permit filing of petitions on behalf of marginalised and deprived sections of the society by public spirited individuals .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 2010 (HC)

Sudarshan Gochhayat. Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

..... that the lands notified in the preliminary notifications are needed for the company for establishment of a university which was not in existence either under the orissa universities act or the university grant commission act at the time of initiation of the proceedings or at the time of publishing the declaration notifications ..... certainly affect the inter-generational equity for the people of the locality. the conversion of nature of the lands in question from agricultural to non-agricultural purpose would affect the environment and ecology at large and it would be certainly in the contravention of the aforesaid statutory laws and ..... for acquisition. 39. the apex court had also occasion to consider similar question in the case of babu ram and another v. state of haryana and anr., (2009) 10 scc 115. it is profitable to quote what the apex court observed in the aforesaid case which reads under : ..... known to the law of however high a degree of solemnity (p. 722). (emphasis made by this court ) in gurdial singh v. state of punjab, air 1980 sc 319, the apex court held as under: 9. the question, then, is what is mala fides in the jurisprudence of power ..... public interest litigation has been an extremely significant development in the history of the indian jurisprudence. the decisions of the supreme court in the 1970s loosened the strict locus standi requirements to permit filing of petitions on behalf of marginalised and deprived sections of the society by public spirited individuals .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 1982 (HC)

Nilamadhaba Nanda and ors. Vs. Orissa University of Agriculture and Te ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1983Ori17; 54(1982)CLT429

..... could not take onaccount of annexure-4.2. the four petitioners are students of the final year b. sc. (ag.) of the college of agriculture of the orissa university of agriculture and technology. by the notice (annexure-1), the students were intimated that the hourly and practical examination of the 4th year b. sc. (ag ..... 1979 all 128; krishnatosh dass gupta v. union of india, (1979) 3 serv lr 681 : (1979 lab ic 1154) (cal); badan singh sangwan v. state of haryana, (1980) 1 serv lr 528 (punj & har); rama chandra pradhan v. union of india, (1980) 49 cut lt 266 and harish chandra tewari v. board of high ..... a few authorities cited at the bar. in the case of board of high school and intermediate education, u. p. v. kumari chittra srivastava, air 1970 sc 1039, the result of kumari chittra was not declared by the board on the ground that she had not secured the requisite percentage at lectures. the ..... by the division bench thus (at p. 132):--'.. .. .. the effect of that amendment (insertion of the explanation in section 141 by the civil procedure code (amendment) act, 1976) is that the procedure prescribed by the code does not apply of its own force to proceedings under article 226 of the constitution. it does not, ..... 1965 all 356; khem karan v. state of u. p., air 1966 all 255; mrs. j.k. pritam singh v. state of punjab, 1967 serv lr 251 (punj); sewa singh v. state of punjab, 1968 serv lr 204; heavy electricals employees' union v. state industrial court, m. p., indore, air 1976 madh pra 66; hans .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //