Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the haryana punjab agricultural universities act 1970 Court: patna Page 1 of about 2 results (0.027 seconds)

May 14 2001 (HC)

The Bihar State Housing Board and anr. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... act which is clearly negatived by the board's aforesaid resolution dated 27-9-1999. he lastly submitted that the parameters for regularisation of such employees has been clearly spelt out by the supreme court in its judgments reported in : (1998)8scc473 (raj narain prasadv, state of u.p.) : (2001)illj596sc (hindustan machine tools v. m. rangareddy) and : (2001)illj710sc (gujarat agricultural university ..... court to issue a mandamus to the state government to regularise the services of the writ petitioners. the supreme court in its judgment reported in : (1993)iillj937sc (state of haryana v. piara singh), has observed that where government orders for regularisation from time to time are issued on conditions which are not unreasonable, arbitrary or discretionary, court should be cautious ..... turn also depends on a number of factors. he has relied on the judgments of the supreme court reported in : air1984sc1850 {jatinder kumar v. state of punjab), and : [1992]194itr434(sc) (state of punjab v. surinder kumar). he next submitted that the board is in acute financial crisis, and the board is finding it extremely difficult to pay wages to ..... conditions. creation and abolition of posts and the discretion to fill up a regular post is the prerogative of the government. the court must while giving direction for regularisation, act with due care and caution. it must first ascertain the relevant facts, and must be cognisant of the several situations and eventuality that may arise on account of such .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 02 1993 (HC)

Ahmad Ali Akhtar and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Patna

..... should strike a just balance between freedom contained in article 19(1)(d) of the constitution and the social interest to be protected. no universal rule can be laid down in this regard. the changing social conditions, the value of human life, the prevailing social philosophy and all ..... and ors. : air1993pat43 where the question of competency of the state legislature, to enact section 27 of the bihar agricultural produce markets act, 1960 was under consideration. in this context i have observed as follows:it is the question of application the doctrine ..... or logical definition but is mere enumeration of broad and comprehensive categories....(g) in the case of international tourist corporation etc. v. state of haryana and ors. : [1981]2scr364 , it was held by the supreme court as follows:before exclusive legislative competence can be claimed for parliament by ..... where the aforesaid observation, were quoted and followed, state of west bengal v. subodh gopal : [1954]1scr587 (5 judges bench), virendra prasad v. state of punjab and anr. : [1958]1scr308 (5 judges bench), abdul hakim v. state of bihar : 1961crilj573 , hart chand sarda v. mizo district council : [1967] ..... 1scr1012 , kanti lal babu lal and bros. v. h. c. paul : [1968]1scr735 (5 judges bench), state of maharashtra v. h. n. rao : [1970]1scr479 , jagmohan singh v. state of u. p. : 1973crilj370 , keshvananda bharti v. state of kerala : air1973sc1461 , addl. district magistrate' jabalpur v. s. shukla : 1976crilj945 , .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 01 1996 (HC)

Rakesh Sharma Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

..... which of the judgments of the division bench is correct. in the case of delhi cloth and general mills co. ltd. and others v. the agricultural product market committee and others, 1992 (2) pljr 253 we have referred to this aspect of the matter wherein we have held as follows:it ..... the court, the judgment rendered therein shall not be binding upon a subsequent bench. he relied on m/s. goodyear india ltd. v. state of haryana, 1990 (2) scc 72. sinha, j., ultimately came to following conclusion:for the reasons aforementioned there is no other option but to hold that 'lohar ..... supreme court on a departure from judicial discipline can whittle down, wish away or to be unbound by the ratio thereof.in sher singh v. state of punjab reported in : [1983]2scr582 , the supreme court observed that 'judgment of the supreme court must be followed without reservation till set aside.37. sinha ..... and others, air 1960 sc 119; a raghavamma and another v. a chanchamma and another, : [1964]2scr933 ; budhan singh v. babi bux and another, : [1970]2scr10 ; mohar singh v. devi charan and others, air 1988 sc and sunderdas kanyalal bhatia and others v. collector thane, maharashtra and others, : [1990]183itr130(sc) ..... in the second schedule as scheduled tribe, without verification form the act that 'lohars' were included in the second schedule, part iii applicable to bihar state and held that they were included as scheduled tribes.50. in mrs. valsamma paul v. cochin university & others, jt 1996 (1) sc 57, the hon'ble .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //