Skip to content

Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the haryana punjab agricultural universities act 1970 Page 8 of about 333 results (0.032 seconds)

Sep 01 2003 (HC)

Praveen Kumar Vs. State of U.P. Through the Secretary, Nagar Vikas, Go ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003(4)AWC3209; (2004)1UPLBEC721

..... daily age employees are regularised. the other decisions relied upon by the learned counsel are gujarat agricultural university v. rathod labhu bechar, 2001 (1) awc 2.3 (sc) (noc) : air 2o01 sc 706 ; jayanta biswas v. university of calcutta and ors., (2001) 1 uplbec 74 and daily rated casual labour employed under ..... 4570 of 2002, decided on 14.7.2003. it was a decision in appeal aforestated against the judgment rendered by a division bench of punjab and haryana high court whereby the respondent were directed to be paid the minimum pay applicable to the regular employees. the apex court held that a ..... , the respondents, who are employed on daily wages cannot be treated as on a par with persons in regular service of the state of haryana holding similar posts. daily-rated workers are not required to possess the qualifications prescribed for regular workers, nor do they have to fulfil the ..... both in view that reposing our trust in the relevant instrumentalities of the state that may be connected with the implementation of the scheme to act with a sense of fairness, anxiety too meet the demands of the human requirements and also anxious to fulfil the constitutional obligations of the state ..... to state that the nagar palika parishad, modi nagar has already put in papers to the state government for creation of posts and it would act upon regularisation process as soon as the requisite posts are sanctioned by the state government. the learned counsel, however, vehemently demurred to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 09 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Naresh Kaushal Advocate Vs. the Regional Passport Officer

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... to attend the convocation ceremony of his son in the rochester university, new york, which is slated to be held on 17th and 18th of may, 2013. the said fir arose from sale of agricultural land belonging to the petitioner, which resulted in alleged violation of section 36 (1) of the act. heard learned counsel for the parties. in view of the fact ..... trial court has yet to take a final decision on the cancellation report submitted by the police. on the strength of this police report, the senior superintendent of police, rupnagar, punjab, had recommended cwp no.8387 of 2013 -2- non-grant of passport facilities to the petitioner. it was also on the strength of this police report that the passport authority ..... a report to the passport office that case fir no.196 dated 22.12.2009 under section 36 (1) of the punjab apartment and property regulation act, 1995 (in short 'the act') has been registered at police station rupnagar, punjab, against the petitioner. however, in the written statement filed by the respondent in court today, it has been stated in para 3 that a ..... cwp no.8387 of 2013 -1- in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh cwp no.8387 of 2013 date of decision:09. 05.2013 jarnail singh ....petitioner versus the regional passport officer ....respondent coram:- hon'ble mr.justice rajiv narain raina .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 21 2005 (HC)

Udai Pratap Singh Son of Sri Shyam Bihari Singh, Presently Posted as L ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(3)ESC1755

..... are appointed regularly. similar view has also been taken by the apex court in gujrat agricultural university v. rathed labhu baker and ors. reported in air 2001 s.c. 706, wherein the proposed scheme of the university for payment of remuneration which contains payment of minimum wage as prescribed by the government ..... . the qualifications of chairman of the board is also of sufficiently high standard unless a person is or has been a vice-chancellor of university established by law is or has been in the opinion of the state government an outstanding officer of administrative service not below the rank of ..... direct the committees of management to fix their wages not less than wage fixed for 'skilled workman' under the provisions of minimum wages act.38. in case of haryana unrecognised schools' association (supra) the question for consideration before the hon'ble apex court was that whether teachers of an educational institution can ..... reported in air 1990 s.c. 883, chief conservator of forest v. jagannath maruti kundhare reported in air 1996 s.c. 2898 and state of punjab v. devendra singh reported in 1998 (9) s.c.c. 595 . in one set of cases referred above the apex court has directed to regularise ..... court has quoted the observation of the decisions rendered in federation of all india customs and central excise stenographers, air 1988 sc 1291 and state of haryana v. jasmer singh reported in air (1997) sc 1788. thereafter in para 18 of the aforesaid decision it has been held that the mode .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 26 2014 (HC)

1.K.V.Jeyaraj Vs. 1.The Chancellor of Universities,

Court : Chennai

..... and cas promotion. ii)identification of posts of professor in an under graduate college for being filled through direct recruitment/deputation shall be carried out by the affiliating/concerned university acting in consultation with the college. where the number of posts of professor worked out as a percentage of the number of posts of associate professor for cas promotion or ..... leave petition even at the admission stage.30. the respondents also rely upon a decision of the andhra pradesh high court to the same effect in acharya n.g.ranga agricultural university vs. m.devender reddy, cdj2013aphc076 but we should point out at the outset that the decision of the a.p. high court is not directly on the point, though ..... on 11.05.2012 in suresh patilkhede vs. the chancellor. in the said case, the chancellor of pune university (governor of maharashtra) formed a search committee consisting of three persons one of whom was the former chief justice of the punjab and haryana high court. the search committee invited applications and nominations from academicians who fulfilled the qualifications as prescribed by the ..... will lead to a completely dangerous proposition to accept, especially in the light of the status of higher education in the country. therefore, we hold that the madurai kamaraj university act and the statutes issued thereunder do not prescribe any qualifications, either educational or otherwise, for a person to be appointed as vice chancellor. in such circumstances, we have to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2012 (HC)

Present : Mr. Chetan Mittal Senior Advocate Vs. Dr. Puran Chand .... P ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... 20.01.1993 (annexure p-1).dispute between petitioner dr. puran chand and respondent no.1 dr. satish kumar jain both being teachers in haryana agriculture university, hisar, was referred to respondent no.2 arbitrator dr.t.p. yadav, also o 2. professor in the same ..... university. petitioner dr. puran chand, on receiving notice from the arbitrator, moved petition under section 33 of the indian arbitration act, 1940 (in short the act).denying the existence of the arbitration agreement. however, petitioner's prayer for interim stay of ..... frustrate the arbitration proceedings. he tried to create obstruction at every stage. immediately after receiving notice from the arbitrator, petitioner filed petition under section 33 of the act in the court. however, the court declined to grant interim stay of the arbitration proceedings. even before the court could decide the question of interim stay of ..... arbitration proceedings, the petitioner also moved the arbitrator for staying the arbitration proceedings due to pendency of petition under section 33 of the act in the court. the arbitrator negatived the said claim of the petitioner. even after stay of arbitration proceedings was declined by the court, the petitioner moved ..... o 1. in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh. case no.: of 2009 date of decision : december 13, 2012 dr. puran chand ...petitioner versus dr. satish kumar and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 1997 (HC)

Joginder Singh and ors. Vs. Raj Takkar

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (1998)118PLR461

..... on 13th september, 1995. the petitioner no. 1 is ph.d. in applied economics and an mba from usa, university of oregan. the petitioner no. 1 had worked as consultants with international organisation like unido, world bank, common-wealth secretariat, food and agriculture organisation of the united nations, apctt. he has provided consultancy services in the area of development of small and ..... intends to start his consultancy organisation in chandigarh so that benefits of his rich experience can be made available to the states of punjab, haryana and u.t., chandigarh. the petitioner no. 1 is also to induct mr. ramandeep singh juneja his son in the consultancy services. since the petitioner has retired from the govt. ..... any other residential building or commercial building in the urban area of chandigarh, nor they have vacated such a building without sufficient cause after the commencement of the rent restriction act in the urban area of chandigarh.'2. mr. chopra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner-landlord submitted that the petitioner vide the proposed amendment wants to bring on ..... . the petitioners are not occupying any other residential building in the urban area of chandigarh and have not vacated such a building without sufficient cause after the enforcement of the act in the urban area of chandigarh.'para 3(v) after the proposed amendment reads as under:'that the petitioner no. 1 dr. joginder singh juneja has since retired after attaining .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 30 2006 (HC)

Harish Tandon Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2829

..... india and ors. , consecutively the constitution bench held so. in between the period of the aforesaid judgments in deepak sibal v. punjab university and anr. and state of haryana and anr. v. jat singh the supreme court similarly held in connection with the point of intelligible differentia. it is to be ..... by the authorities or by the district magistrate. district magistrate is representative of the state in respect of conversion. in khandige sham bhat v. agricultural income-tax officer, kasaragod and anr. air 1963 sc 591, a constitution bench of the supreme court held that it is now well ..... special leave petition was dismissed with a rider that the leases will be granted subject to the provisions of urban land (ceiling and regulation) act, 1976. such act is no more applicable. therefore, the division bench judgment, as stands, will have binding effect on us principally. there the division bench held ..... the scheme of awas evam vikas parishad and development authorities. so long as written law is not available, the executives are empowered to act on the reasonable executive directions or instructions. it cannot be inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights not only under article 14 ..... is the party. private parties are concerned only with their personal interest whereas the state while exercising its powers and discharging its functions, acts indubitably as is expected of it for public good and public interest. the impact of every state action is also on public interest. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 11 1997 (SC)

Samatha Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1997SC3297; JT1997(6)SC449; 1997(4)SCALE746; (1997)8SCC191; [1997]Supp2SCR305

..... manipur land reforms and land revenue act, 1970 was made similarly, the orissa scheduled areas (transfer of immovable property) regulation and also orissa land reforms act, 1960 were made for the same purpose. the rajasthan tenancy act, 1955, as amended in 1956, prohibits such transfer of lands. in sikkim, sikkim revenue order, 1977 and sikkim agricultural land ceiling and reforms act, 1977 are enforced. equally, ..... 42 right to life - scope and content. 79. article 21 of the constitution reinforces "right to life" - a fundamental right - which is an inalienable human right declared by the universal declaration on human rights and the sequential conventions to which india is asignatory. in delhi transport corporation vs. d.t.c. mazdoor congress [air 1991sc 101 at 173] in paragraph ..... given so as to preserve forestland from deforestation to maintain ecology and to prevent environmental degradation and hazardous effects on right to life. in virender gaur & ors. vs. state of haryana & ors. [(1995) 2 scc 577] this court in paragraph 7 at pages580-81 has held that environmental, ecological, air, water pollution, etc. should be regarded as amounting to ..... and twenty-five, of whom three-fourths were to be elected representatives of the scheduled tribes in the legislative assembly of the state as in the case of the punjab and the united provinces; it was laid down as the duty of the tribes advisory council generally to advise the government on all matters pertaining to the administration of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 02 1991 (HC)

Suvina B. Redkar Vs. Government of Goa and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1991(4)BomCR695

..... of the applicability of the principles of natural justice to an administrative decision. it was a service matter relating to appointment of the university teachers under u.p. state universities act (1973). the principal question which arose for consideration in the said case was whether the power conferred upon the chancellor under section ..... important is two experts having special knowledge and practical experience in matters relating to town and country planning, architecture, engineering, transport, industry, commerce, agriculture, geology etc. it is thus an all representative body which includes expert members also.149. as regards the functions and powers of the board, ..... of being heard before he is removed from service, although the security of his tenure is affected by such abolition of post. see state of haryana v. des raj 1976 (1) s.l.r. 191 and judgment of the supreme court in the case of k. rajindran and others v ..... refer to the last of the decisions of the supreme court relied upon on behalf of the respondents i.e. ajit singh v. state of punjab, : (1983)illj410sc in which the rule of interpretation on the question as to where her a particular provision in mandatory or directory is ..... upon the state or the highest authority has been held to be a guarantee that it would be exercised, fairly and with responsibility. see the following cases: : (1970)iillj403sc , c.b. boarding and lodging v. state of mysore, para 8 : [1979]118itr534(sc) , s.t. commr. m.p. v. radhakrishna, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 26 1992 (HC)

Patel PravIn Kumar Somnath and ors. Vs. Gujarat State Land Development ...

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (1993)ILLJ916Guj

..... by adopting the process of reasoning by analogy under the apprentices act any trade, industry or establishment can employ apprentices under the apprentices contract. they submitted that the respondent-corporation has under the instructions of central government solely with a view to providing training to fresh post-graduates from agricultural university has decided to employ apprentices for a period of one year ..... the respondent no. 1-corporation by virtue of any order of this court. in the aforesaid decision in the case of dena nath (supra) under contract labour (regulation & abolition) act, 1970 the supreme court in terms observed that no petition under art. 226 of the constitution of india can be entertained at the instance of employees. no mandamus can be issued ..... employed would become directly the employee of the principal employer.' having posed with the aforesaid question, the supreme court undertook the exercise of examining the conflict between the decisions of punjab and kerala high courts on one hand and madras, bombay, karnataka and gujarat high courts on the other hand. while undertaking that exercise the court posed the most relevant ..... that on this question there was a direct conflict between the decision of the high courts of punjab and kerala on one hand and decisions of the high courts of madras, gujarat and karnataka on the other hand. the view of the punjab and kerala high courts was that the only consequence of non-compliance either by the principal employer .....

Tag this Judgment!

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //