Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: the land acquisition punjab amendment act 1969 Court: allahabad Year: 1975 Page 1 of about 2 results (0.036 seconds)

Jan 22 1975 (HC)

Smt. Ram Mani Devi Vs. Rent Control and Eviction Officer and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-22-1975

Reported in : AIR1976All517

..... any one on a sitting tenant.45. this construction brings illegal sub-lettings within the purview of the controlling power of the district magistrate as before the amending act of 1952. if a tenant sub-lets without the requisite permission he contravenes sub-section (3). the sub-tenant will be an unauthorised occupant. he will ..... let or not to sub-let, in the same manner as he could require the landlord to let or not to let to a tenant. by the amending act of 1952 the legislature maintained the power of the district magistrate to control letting as well as sub-letting, but yet added sub-section (3). obviously ..... who sub-lets without an order under section 7 (1) could be prosecuted and fined or imprisoned under section 8 of the act.33. the u. p. (temporary) control of rent and eviction (amendment) act, 1952 (act no. xxiv of 1952) repealed and re-enacted the whole of section 7 as follows :--'7.1 (a) every landlord ..... to continue in force even after the new statute or regulation comes into force (see state of punjab v. mohar singh, 1955 scr 893 = (air 1955 sc 84) and jindas oil mills v. g. e. co. ltd. : [1969]3scr836 .where the intention of the legislature is clear and unambiguous there is no need to ..... consideration for a price paid or promised. under section 108 of the transfer of property act the lessee is entitled to be put in possession of the property. a lease is, therefore, a transfer of an interest in land. the lessor parts with his right to enjoy the property during the term of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 1975 (HC)

State Vs. Sant Prakash and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-29-1975

Reported in : 1976CriLJ274

..... large quantity of undeclared gold. the assistant collector of customs and central excise raipur issued an authorisation under rule 126-l (2) of the defence of india (amendment) rules, 1963, (gold control rules) for searching the premises of the appellant. pursuant thereto the appellant's premises were searched and as a result of search ..... offence under section 353 or section 332 i. p. c, in the case of prem chand v. state ((1965) 2 cri lj 843) the punjab high court while dealing with the case of an accused who was a hotel-keeper held that the excise inspector when he proceeded to search the hotel premises ..... thrown overboard, stayed or destroyed so as to prevant seizure by any officer authorised by the administrator;(iii) any conveyance which having been required to stop or land under sub-rule (1) fails to do so, except for good and sufficient cause;(iv) any conveyance from which any gold cleared for exportation is ..... or is about to be contravened, at any time stop any such vehicle, animal or vessel or, in the case of an aircraft, compel it to land, and(a) rummage and search any part of the aircraft, vehicle or vessel;(b) examine and search any goods in the aircraft, vehicle or vessel or ..... 1). the supreme court considered the aforesaid provision of law in the case of income tax officer v. seth brothers : [1969]74itr836(sc) and held that by express terms of the income tax act and the rules the income tax officer may obtain the assistance of a police officer. by sub-section (13) of section .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //